[Get Solution]Peer Review

Step 1: Check the completeness and appropriateness of the autoethnography by answering these questions: ·      Are all three legs of the stool (memoir, researched argument, and sophisticated reflection) in the paper? ·      Does the paper incorporate four sources from GRC’s databases? ·      Is there a full MLA-style work cited list? Are there in-text citations in MLA style? Do these “match” in the sense that, you can find each author’s work cited on the works cited page AND in an in-text citation? Step 2: As you did Step 2 above, you probably noticed that portions of the paper are stronger & more complete, while others are weaker.  ·      Which leg is almost complete right now, and which is the least complete? How can the author of the paper improve the balance of the paper? ·      Are there any sources whose integration needs more work? Tell us about that opportunity to improve. ·      Is the paper really an autoethnography–does it feel like the two example papers you read for the last module–or is it more like a personal narrative paper with some research thrown in? Please advise your author. Step 3: Review especially the thesis statement and topic sentences. ·      Can you find the narrowed topic + what the author is proving or saying about that (thesis)? Is it placed at the end of the introduction paragraph? ·      Can you find the narrowed subtopic + what the author is proving or saying about each (topic sentence) in the body paragraphs? In particular, are the researched argument paragraph topic sentences solidly analytical? Step 4: As a reader, what did you gain from reading this paper? What did you wish it explained more or pursued in a different way? Step 5: Do you have any overall comments to make about the autoethnography, especially about purpose, audience, genre, impetus, or author (rhetorical situation)?

So much stress and so little time? We’ve got you covered. Get your paper proofread, edited or written from scratch within the tight deadline.