[Get Solution]Naturalistic Observation

Description:For this assignment, you will get the opportunity to engage in naturalistic observation.Objectives:• Review descriptive research and its four key methods.• Compare and contrast the fundamental goals of basic and applied research.• Discuss the ethical concerns and guidelines for psychological research.Instructions:As you start to observe these individuals in their natural setting, focus on their behavior. You may want to bring a notepad and take notes of the behavior while being very objective. This is naturalistic observation, so don’t try to interpret the behavior, only write down what you see.Step 1: Review.Review the assigned readings and additional material included in this module’s content.Step 2: Observe.Select a space where people congregate (farmers market, mall, playground, fair/carnival, etc.) and observe them for 30-45 minutes.Once you have completed the observation, attempt to form a theory regarding human behavior you observed. Write about it in detail, answering the following questions.1. State the location, time, date of the observation2. What behavior did you select to focus on?3. Can you say anything about people in general based on what you saw?4. Did you see similarities in people’s behaviors?5. Did you notice any differences in behavior (age, gender, race, etc.)?6. Did you notice any potential research questions or hypotheses that may be of interest for future study?7. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this type of research method?Step 4. Submit Your AssignmentYour response should be in a Word document, two to four pages long, written in APA format (12-point font, double spaced).Assignment Submission:When you have completed the assignment, select the “Submit Assignment” button at the top of these instructions, and choose a format for submitting your assignment.RubricAssignment Rubric – UniversalAssignment Rubric – UniversalCriteria Ratings PtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdeas10 ptsIdeas are clear, insightful, thought provoking, and focused; they consistently support the solution to the assignment challenge or question(s).8 ptsIdeas are clear and focused to support the solution to the assignment challenge or question(s), but they are not consistently insightful or thought provoking.6 ptsIdeas are clear but conventional or general; they only somewhat support the solution to the assignment challenge or question(s).2 ptsIdeas are unclear or clichéd and demonstrate a lack of focus in support of the solution to the assignment challenge or question(s).10 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplication10 ptsThe assignment includes clear connections to lesson content. It includes abundant details and examples that generate interest and provide relevant, concrete, and insightful evidence in support of sound logic.8 ptsThe assignment includes clear connections to lesson content. It includes abundant details and examples that generate interest and provide relevant, concrete, and insightful evidence in support of sound logic.

So much stress and so little time? We’ve got you covered. Get your paper proofread, edited or written from scratch within the tight deadline.