[Get Solution]Allegory of the Cave

READ AND ANNOTATE THE WHOLE ARTICLE “ALLEGORY OF THE CAVE” YOU CAN USE ADOBE ACROBAT TO HIGHLIGHT AND ANNOTATE OR PRINT IT OUT AND DO IT HANDWRITTEN AND SEND ME SCREENSHOTS OF THE ANNOTATIONS AND HIGHLIGHTS. USE THE UPLOADED FILE CALLED “NOTES SAMPLE” TO SEE AN EXAMPLE OF WHAT IT IS SUPPOSED TO LOOK LIKE.  MAKE SURE TO FOLLOW THE GUIDELINES TO KNOW WHAT TO LOOK FOR WHEN ANNOTATING AND HIGHLIGHTING. WHAT IM LOOKING FOR: I’m looking for close engagement with the text, not perfect comprehension. Highlighting important points is fine but insufficient. When you read philosophy, you are supposed to have a dialogue with the text. You can do this by doing combinations of the following, as appropriate: 1. Annotating important definitions or terms (use df or something similar) 2. Annotating important arguments (use arg or something similar)     2A. Note the conclusion (label with a c)     2B. Note the important premises (label with a p) 3. Annotating important counterarguments and replies. (use ca and reply or something similar) Philosophical writing often involves an author having a dialogue with themselves. The author might say “I believe that x, because… On the other hand, someone might argue not x… But this is why x is still true.” Sometimes it seems like the author is repetitive or contradicting themselves, but usually, dialogue like this is what’s really going on. 4. Annotating the thesis (use a thesis or something similar) 5. Asking comprehension questions (write out the questions). Examples: “What is the main point here?” “How are these ideas connected?” “I’m getting lost in the terminology here.” 6. Asking philosophical questions (write out the questions) Examples: “Why does she think that?” “What’s the evidence?” “What if…[fill in]” “I disagree because…[fill in]” “I agree because…[fill in]”

So much stress and so little time? We’ve got you covered. Get your paper proofread, edited or written from scratch within the tight deadline.