[SOLVED] Hi, i need the table i uploaded to be filled Health Pr

Hi, i need the table i uploaded to be filled Health Promotion Program, Part B2: Evidence-based Literature SearchYou will be expected to search for the highest level of evidence for your health promotion project. Please listen to the lecture on searching the evidence, use the services of the research librarian, and pull from the knowledge gained in NUR 39000 Nursing Research to complete this assignment. The Purdue Owl website is a great resource for you when citing your references in APA style.   Self- Assessment of Learning Styles.pdf          . JBI-Levels-of-Evidence(1).pdf Library Resources: The reference librarian for the School of Nursing has created a very helpful website of library resources for this course. Click on the link below to accept this website:NUR 39400 Library Resource Guide  https://mycourses.purdue.edu/bbcswebdav/pid-12421733-dt-content-rid-93949047_1/courses/pnw_45033.201920/JBI-Levels-of-Evidence%281%29.pdf New JBI Levels of Evidence Developed by the Joanna Briggs Institute Levels of Evidence and Grades of Recommendation Working Party October 2013 PLEASE NOTE: These levels are intended to be used alongside the supporting document outlining their use. Using Levels of Evidence does not preclude the need for careful reading, critical appraisal and clinical reasoning when applying evidence. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE FOR EFFECTIVENESS Level 1 – Experimental Designs Level 1.a – Systematic review of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) Level 1.b – Systematic review of RCTs and other study designs Level 1.c – RCT Level 1.d – Pseudo-RCTs Level 2 – Quasi-experimental Designs Level 2.a – Systematic review of quasi-experimental studies Level 2.b – Systematic review of quasi-experimental and other lower study designs Level 2.c – Quasi-experimental prospectively controlled study Level 2.d – Pre-test – post-test or historic/retrospective control group study Level 3 – Observational – Analytic Designs Level 3.a – Systematic review of comparable cohort studies Level 3.b – Systematic review of comparable cohort and other lower study designs Level 3.c – Cohort study with control group Level 3.d – Case – controlled study Level 3.e – Observational study without a control group Page | 2 Level 4 – Observational –Descriptive Studies Level 4.a – Systematic review of descriptive studies Level 4.b – Cross-sectional study Level 4.c – Case series Level 4.d – Case study Level 5 – Expert Opinion and Bench Research Level 5.a – Systematic review of expert opinion Level 5.b – Expert consensus Level 5.c – Bench research/ single expert opinion Page | 3 LEVELS OF EVIDENCE FOR DIAGNOSIS Level 1 – Studies of Test Accuracy among consecutive patients Level 1.a – Systematic review of studies of test accuracy among consecutive patients Level 1.b – Study of test accuracy among consecutive patients Level 2 – Studies of Test Accuracy among non-consecutive patients Level 2.a – Systematic review of studies of test accuracy among non-consecutive patients Level 2.b – Study of test accuracy among non-consecutive patients Level 3 – Diagnostic Case control studies Level 3.a – Systematic review of diagnostic case control studies Level 3.b – Diagnostic case-control study Level 4 – Diagnostic yield studies Level 4.a – Systematic review of diagnostic yield studies Level 4.b – Individual diagnostic yield study Level 5 – Expert Opinion and Bench Research Level 5.a – Systematic review of expert opinion Level 5.b – Expert consensus Level 5.c – Bench research/ single expert opinion Page | 4 LEVELS OF EVIDENCE FOR PROGNOSIS Level 1 – Inception Cohort Studies Level 1.a – Systematic review of inception cohort studies Level 1.b – Inception cohort study Level 2 – Studies of All or none Level 2.a – Systematic review of all or none studies Level 2.b – All or none studies Level 3 – Cohort studies Level 3.a – Systematic review of cohort studies (or control arm of RCT) Level 3.b – Cohort study (or control arm of RCT) Level 4 – Case series/Case Controlled/ Historically Controlled studies Level 4.a – Systematic review of Case series/Case Controlled/ Historically Controlled studies Level 4.b – Individual Case series/Case Controlled/ Historically Controlled study Level 5 – Expert Opinion and Bench Research Level 5.a – Systematic review of expert opinion Level 5.b – Expert consensus Level 5.c – Bench research/ single expert opinion Page | 5 LEVELS OF EVIDENCE FOR ECONOMIC EVALUATIONS Levels 1. Decision model with assumptions and variables informed by systematic review and tailored to fit the decision making context. 2. Systematic review of economic evaluations conducted in a setting similar to the decision makers. 3. Synthesis/review of economic evaluations undertaken in a setting similar to that in which the decision is to be made and which are of high quality (comprehensive and credible measurement of costs and health outcomes, sufficient time period covered, discounting, and sensitivity testing). 4. Economic evaluation of high quality (comprehensive and credible measurement of costs and health outcomes, sufficient time period covered, discounting and sensitivity testing) and conducted in setting similar to the decision making context. 5. Synthesis / review of economic evaluations of moderate and/or poor quality (insufficient coverage of costs and health effects, no discounting, no sensitivity testing, time period covered insufficient). 6. Single economic evaluation of moderate or poor quality (see directly above level 5 description of studies). 7. Expert opinion on incremental cost effectives of intervention and comparator. Page | 6 LEVELS OF EVIDENCE FOR MEANINGFULNESS 1. Qualitative or mixed-methods systematic review 2. Qualitative or mixed-methods synthesis 3. Single qualitative study 4. Systematic review of expert opinion 5. Expert opinion

Can’t find relevant content? Don’t worry– you have a team of professionals to help you.

All you need to do is fill in the order form in the upper right corner and upload the files that are crucial for your assignment. Also, don’t forget to specify whether your assignment has to be based upon a specific research, theory or method. After that, we will assign an expert to complete your order. You can always chat with your expert and ask any questions you have during the working process.