PHL 103 Kishwaukee Immediate Inferences & Categorical Syllogism Exam Questions

PHL 103 Kishwaukee Immediate Inferences & Categorical Syllogism Exam Questions PHL 103 Kishwaukee Immediate Inferences & Categorical Syllogism Exam Questions ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL NURSING PAPERS Home > Humanities > PHL 103 Kishwaukee Immediate Inferences & Categorical Syllogism Exam Questions Question Description I’m working on a Philosophy multi-part question and need support to help me study. (a) clearly identify the immediate inference as valid, invalid, or valid by limitation, and (b) provide the rationale for your assessment in terms of the squares of opposition and/or the operations of conversion, obversion, and contraposition. Be sure to pay special attention whatever effect existential import may have on the validity of the immediate inferences (#1-10) Modern Interpretation Test the validity of each of the following categorical syllogisms using Venn diagrams. (1) When setting up each Venn diagram, please use the lower left-hand circle to represent the subject term of the conclusion and the lower right-hand circle to represent the predicate term of the conclusion. The upper circle should be used to represent the syllogism’s middle term. (2) Clearly identify the form of the syllogism using the indicated terms, and keep in mind that you may need to reduce terms, as explained in Section 6G, before diagramming. Any argument that results from the reduction of terms should include only the three terms indicated for the corresponding syllogism. Finally, (3) clearly indicate whether the argument is valid or invalid, and (4) explain your reasoning (#11-13) Traditional Interpretation ( #14-15) Unformatted Attachment Preview PHILOSOPHY 103 FALL 2020 WRITTEN HOMEWORK SET #3 DUE BY 5:00 PM ON WEDNESDAY, 11 NOVEMBER 2020 I. IMMEDIATE INFERENCES For each of the following immediate inferences, (a) clearly identify the immediate inference as valid, invalid, or valid by limitation, and (b) provide the rationale for your assessment in terms of the squares of opposition and/or the operations of conversion, obversion, and contraposition. Be sure to pay special attention whatever effect existential import may have on the validity of the immediate inferences. (1 pt. each = 10 pts. total) 1. All fear-instilling dragons are formidable foes. Therefore, it is false that some fear-instilling dragons are not formidable foes. 2. Some timepieces are not devices controlled by quartz. Therefore, some timepieces are devices controlled by quartz. 3. No amateur athletes are people who are paid $1,000,000 or more per year. Therefore, some athletes who are paid less than $1,000,000 per year are not professional athletes. 4. All presidents are people subject to the law. Therefore, no presidents are people above the law. 5. No centaurs are amiable beings. Therefore, some centaurs are not amiable beings. 6. Some identity crises are not pleasant experiences. Therefore, some pleasant experiences are not identity crises. 7. All honest lies are valuable contributions to conversation. Therefore, it is false that no honest lies are valuable contributions to conversation. 8. It is false that some logic books are highly entertaining reads. Therefore, it is false that all logic books are highly entertaining reads. 9. All fraudulent marriages are things that can be annulled. Therefore, some things that can be annulled are fraudulent marriages. 10. Some male mermaids are not attractive beings. PHL 103 Kishwaukee Immediate Inferences & Categorical Syllogism Exam Questions Therefore, some male mermaids are unattractive beings. II. CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISMS: TESTING VALIDITY WITH VENN DIAGRAMS Test the validity of each of the following categorical syllogisms using Venn diagrams. (1) When setting up each Venn diagram, please use the lower left-hand circle to represent the subject term of the conclusion and the lower right-hand circle to represent the predicate term of the conclusion. The upper circle should be used to represent the syllogism’s middle term. (2) Clearly identify the form of the syllogism using the indicated terms, and keep in mind that you may need to reduce terms, as explained in Section 6G, before diagramming. Any argument that results from the reduction of terms should include only the three terms indicated for the corresponding syllogism. Finally, (3) clearly indicate whether the argument is valid or invalid, and (4) explain your reasoning. (15 points total) A. UNDER THE MODERN INTERPRETATION 1. All trespassers are people who will be prosecuted, and some trespassers are people who will be shot. Therefore, some people who will be prosecuted are people who will be shot. (T = trespassers; P = people who will be prosecuted; S = people who will be shot) 2. Some dogs are caring pets, and all baby goats are caring pets. Therefore, some dogs are not baby goats. (D = dogs; C = caring pets; B = baby goats) 3. No nuclear plants are safe ventures, and no unsafe ventures are things the government should fund. Therefore, no nuclear plants are things the government should fund. (N = nuclear plants; S = safe ventures; G = things the government should fund) B. UNDER THE TRADITIONAL INTERPRETATION 4. No worldly possessions are unimaginable things, and no imaginable things are unchangeable items. Therefore, some changeable items are not other-worldly possessions. (W = worldly possessions; I = imaginable things; C = changeable items) 5. All non-domesticated animals are animals that are not household pets, and no unicorns are domesticated animals. Therefore, some unicorns are not household pets. (D = domesticated animals; H = household pets; U = unicorns) … Purchase answer to see full attachment Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10