Walden NURS6053 Week 7 Workplace Environment Assessment
Walden NURS6053 Week 7 Workplace Environment Assessment
Walden NURS6053 Week 7 Workplace Environment Assessment
NURS6053 Interprofessional Organizational and Systems Leadership
Week 7 Discussion
Workplace Environment Assessment
How healthy is your workplace?
You may think your current organization operates seamlessly, or you may feel it has many issues. You may experience or even observe things that give you pause. Yet, much as you wouldnt try to determine the health of a patient through mere observation, you should not attempt to gauge the health of your work environment based on observation and opinion. Often, there are issues you perceive as problems that others do not; similarly, issues may run much deeper than leadership recognizes.
There are many factors and measures that may impact organizational health. Among these is civility. While an organization can institute policies designed to promote such things as civility, how can it be sure these are managed effectively? In this Discussion, you will examine the use of tools in measuring workplace civility.
To Prepare:
Review the Resources and examine the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory, found on page 20 of Clark (2015).
Review and complete the Work Environment Assessment Template in the Resources.
You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computers spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper in silence and then aloud before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.
Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.
Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at padding to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.
The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.
RE: Discussion Week 7
Thank you for your interesting report about the workplace environment. Based on your report, incivility in the workplace has a negative effect to a workers mental and also physical health. The negative workplace behaviors also can cause unsafe working conditions for the workers and also poor patient care. According to your report, a nifty healthcare makes sure a safe and a productive workplace is established and maintained (Crossman, 2015). You also talked about ANA code of ethics for the nurses. Based on the report, working colleagues and coworkers are supposed to treat each other with respect and dignity inoder to work in a collaborative manner and also makes the environment friendly. Clark healthy workplace inventory is also used to determine the health of the workplace. According to your report, you also talked about your experience whereby you experienced incivility in the workplace (Francoeuret al., 2019). The story involved two different employees who you have talked about their argument and the major cause of the conflict.
References
Crossman, J. E. (2015). Being on the outer: The risks and benefits of spiritual self-disclosure in the Australian workplace. Journal of Management & Organization, 21(6), 772-785.
Francoeur, V., Paillé, P., Yuriev, A., & Boiral, O. (2019). The measurement of green workplace behaviors: A systematic review. Organization & Environment, 34(1), 18-42.
