ENGL1310: Evaluate an argumentative essay
I dont understand this English question and need help to study.
Module 5 Assignment 5.1
- Due Sunday by 9:59pm
- Points 50
- Submitting a text entry box or a file upload
- Available Dec 29, 2019 at 10pm – Jan 12 at 9:59pm 14 days
Description:
Using the Learning Resource Center, Concordes resource library- https://www.galepages.com/miss22358 (Links to an external site.), and other academically appropriate sources, write a short essay evaluating an argument.
Objectives:
- Evaluate an argumentative essay.
Instructions:
- Complete Critical Thinking and Writing Activity #3 at the end of Chapter 17. Make sure you identify the periodical piece you chose and fully answer the questions in the activity.
- Complete an evaluation of an argumentative essay. Your essay should be 500-700 words long.
Assignment Submission:
- Use of sources is required; all papers must be cited and written in APA format.
- Once you have completed the assignment, click the Submit Assignment option in the menu to the right and select a format for submitting your assignment.
- Click the Submit Assignment button when you are ready.
Rubric
Writing Assignments Rubric
Writing Assignments Rubric
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Assignment Ideas
|
10.0 pts Ideas are clear, insightful, thought-provoking, and focused so that they consistently support the topic, thesis and audience for the paper. |
6.0 pts Ideas are clear and focused to support the topic and a clearly-stated central idea, but are not consistently insightful or thought-provoking. |
4.0 pts Ideas are clear but conventional or general, and support the topic, thesis, and audience for the paper. |
0.0 pts Ideas are unclear or clichéd and demonstrate a lack of focus in support of the topic or a central idea, which may be vague or missing. |
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Assignment Development
|
10.0 pts Development is fresh, with abundant details and examples that arouse audience interest and provide relevant, concrete, specific and insightful evidence in support of sound logic. |
6.0 pts Development is adequate, but may lack depth, with details and examples that arouse audience interest and provide relevant, concrete, specific evidence in support of sound logic. |
4.0 pts Development is sufficient but general, providing adequate but perhaps not interesting details, examples, and evidence that include no logical fallacies or unsupported claims. |
0.0 pts Development is insufficient, providing scarce or inappropriate details, evidence, and examples that may include logical fallacies or unsupported claims. |
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Organization
|
10.0 pts Organization is coherent, unified and effective in support of the papers purpose/ plan and consistently demonstrates effective and appropriate rhetorical transitions between ideas and paragraphs. |
6.0 pts Organization is coherent, unified and effective in support of the papers purpose/ plan and usually demonstrates effective and appropriate rhetorical transitions between ideas and paragraphs |
4.0 pts Organization is coherent and unified overall in support of the essays purpose/ plan, but is ineffective at times and may demonstrate abrupt or weak transitions between ideas or paragraphs. |
0.0 pts Organization is confused and fragmented in support of the essays purpose/ plan and demonstrates a lack of structure or coherence that negatively affects readability. |
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Style & Mechanics
|
10.0 pts Readable and rhetorically effective in tone, incorporating varied sentence structure, precise word choice and correct grammar, spelling and punctuation. (Mastery of style) |
6.0 pts Style is readable and rhetorically effective in tone, incorporating varied sentence structure, effective word choice, and correct grammar, spelling and punctuation. (Effective style) |
4.0 pts Style is readable, but unremarkable in tone, sometimes including a lack of sentence variety effective word choice, or some distracting, but not serious, errors in grammar, spelling and punctuation. (Readable but inconsistent style) |
0.0 pts Style is incoherent or inappropriate in tone, including a lack of sentence variety, ineffective or inappropriate word choice, and serious errors in grammar, spelling and punctuation. (Ineffective style) |
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Format
|
10.0 pts Format is correct, meets all assignment directions, and works expertly to support the essays purpose/plan. |
6.0 pts Format is correct, meets all assignment directions, and works generally to support the essays purpose/plan. |
4.0 pts Format is mostly correct, meets critical aspects of assignment directions, and works mostly to support the essays purpose/ plan. |
0.0 pts Format is faulty, does not meet sufficient aspects of the assignment direction, and does not support the essays purpose/ plan. |
10.0 pts
Total Points: 50.0
Link to Learning Resource Center Concordes resource library
