Expanded Soda Taxes Stir Pushback
Im working on a Economics question and need guidance to help me study.
By Jennifer Maloney and
Shayndi Raice
When Cook County, Ill., needed to plug a budget hole last year, it turned to a new levy on soft drinks it hoped would boost its fiscal healthand the health of its residents.
But pushback has been fierce since the penny-an-ounce tax (Links to an external site.) took effect Aug. 2 in the county that includes Chicago. Retailers are suing the county over the tax, and consumers are suing retailers. State lawmakers on both sides of the aisle have introduced bills that would kill the tax and prevent counties from levying similar ones in the future. A bipartisan group of Cook County commissioners have proposed an ordinance that would repeal the tax.
Several municipalities approved beverage taxes (Links to an external site.) in 2016 and four have put them into effect this year, including Philadelphia (Links to an external site.). Cook County is the largest municipality to implement such a tax.
The taxes, pushed by public-health advocates to counter a national obesity epidemic, are far from popular. But the turmoil has been greatest in Philadelphia (Links to an external site.)and Cook County, which are using them to generate revenue and havent limited them to sugary drinks that have been linked to obesity and diabetes.
Instead, the taxes in these two municipalities can include diet sodas and teas, as well as purportedly healthy drinks such as kombucha and coconut water, leaving consumers frustrated and businesses concerned about the impact on their sales.
The muddled goals could raise questions about the future viability of such taxes.
There is a phenomenal amount of difference between the amount of sugar in a cranberry juice cocktail and a sugar-free or low-sugar drink, for example, said Donald Marron, a fellow with the Urban Institute who believes soda taxes can be effective if sugar content is taken into account. From a public health point of view, theres no reason to tax those at the same amount per ounce.
The Cook County board approved its tax in November after discovering a $174 million budget gap. The measure is projected to bring in $200 million in revenue in 2018.
Ammar Rizki, Cook Countys chief financial officer, said the taxes would help fund county hospitals, where the county estimates it covers about $200 million in costs related to obesity and diabetes.
Philadelphias tax funds pre-kindergarten, community schools and capital improvements to parks and libraries.
The tax fights (Links to an external site.) have pitted public-health groups such as the charitable foundation of former New York Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg against retailer associations and the soda industry, with each side spending tens of millions of dollars on lobbying and advertising.
The momentum is on our side, but it is early days in the fight, said a spokesman for Mr. Bloombergs foundation, which is running pro-tax ads in Cook County and Philadelphia.
Studies conducted on sweetened-beverage taxes in Mexico and Berkeley, Calif., show that they reduce consumption of sugary drinks. Researchers say it is too soon to say whether they reduce the prevalence of obesity, but there are signs that some people are turning to water as a substitute, which could improve public health.
Rob Karr, president of the Illinois Retail Merchants Association, said that while the policy is cutting consumption of sweetened drinks, it has penalized retailers. The association sued Cook County to block the tax, arguing that it wasnt being uniformly imposed on all types of sweetened drinks.
The sweetened beverage tax helps us make Cook County healthier, safer and more efficient, countered Cook County Board President Toni Preckwinkle, a Democrat, in an email.
Jeff Brown, who owns 13 supermarkets in the Philadelphia area, said he has canceled renovations and expansions in his city stores and is focusing on investing in stores in the suburbs.
The tax revenue generated in Philadelphia brought in nearly $40 million in the first six months, though that was 15% below the citys projections, said a spokeswoman for Philadelphia Mayor Jim Kenney, a Democrat.
Were calling it a win, she said.
Question 1: From the elasticity topic, where would individuals be able to find a substitute, if the tax is applied on a “narrow” or “broad” basis and why?
Question 2: Per the article, what is the negative externality of consuming sugary beverages and what are the social cost to Cook County (hint: what did the finance official say? Please provide that statement from the article which supports your answer.
Question 3: When proposing a tax law the government typically will state how/where the tax revenue derived will be spent towards. Per the article, did the city receive the projected tax revenue they were expecting? If no, why do you think that is the case?
