Conventional Justice
its 2000 words no limit on pages This is the prompt for the essay: Callicles defends a distinction between conventional and natural justice. Explain his position and his reasons for holding it. Explain one of Socrates arguments against Callicles. Briefly assess whether this response succeeds who wins this part of the debate, and why do you think so? Be sure to include: the general distinction between convention and nature and how this applies to justice; why there exists such a thing as conventional justice; why those who are naturally superior ought to live in accordance with natural justice, and what that would amount to; what Callicles conception of happiness is, and exactly how this underlies and supports his other views; precisely how Socrates argument is intended to undermine what Callicles has put forward. precisely how Socrates response does or does not succeed, and why you think so.