Assignment: having replicable results

Assignment: having replicable results

Permalink: 

Assignment: Discuss the importance of having replicable results when conducting research.

1. Discuss the importance of having replicable results when conducting research.

2. What is the difference between descriptive and experimental research methods? Which method can allow you to make causal inferences?

3. What is a case history (case study)? What are some advantages/disadvantages of using case studies?

4. Does correlation between variables the same as a causal relationship between variables? Why or why not?

5. Define mean, median, and mode, and when to use these descriptive statistics.

6. What is the difference between descriptive and inferential statistics?

7. A psychologist is interested in seeing if people who are alcoholic are more likely to be depressed. How would you operationally define your variables (i.e., alcoholic, depressed)? How would you design a study to answer this question? What are your independent and dependent variables? What type of study would you use (e.g., experimental, correlational, case study, survey), and why?

what ethical issues are raised by this legal process of patent protection, and how do we see the primary schools of ethics used in these proprietary measures? What, in this deontological week and in our learning to date, informs our understanding of this situation, and what should be done about it?

What is Replicable Research? Research is replicable when an independent group of researchers can copy the same process and arrive at the same results as the original study. … Empirical generalizations are results that cannot be replicated by independent researchers using valid, but different, methods.

When studies are replicated and achieve the same or similar results as the originalstudy, it gives greater validity to the findings. If a researcher can replicate a study’sresults, it means that it is more likely that those results can be generalized to the larger population.