Applied Science

Response RequiredDiscussion Prompt:  Compare and contrast two planets in our Solar System with Earth. What are the signature features of those planets and how do they compare to Earth?save 75 words for a response

Select a legal case that has ethical implications to nursing.Write a 3-5 page paper that include the following level two headings (APA book, page 62)• Introduction of case• Identification of legal issue• Identification of ethical issue• Deliberation• Outcomes• Impact on local, state, or federal policy and/or general healthcare implications• Conclusion• There is no page limit. The minimum number of pages could be 5-7 depending on how well you are able to summarize the facts and verdict on your case through a• 1.) Brief of your Legal Case,• 2) Analysis of the associated violations of ethical principles, and,• 3) The impact of the verdict on the health care system and on health care policy.

In this assignment, you will be creating a one-page item advising families about nutritionand its role in obesity prevention that could be included in a theoretical monthly virtualnewsletter shared on Facebook or a similar platform.Instructions:Your newsletter item must include the following:• The age group you are writing about:o Infantso Toddlero Preschoolerso Kindergarten• The item must speak directly to families about the selected age group.o Include at least one national guideline.o Information on how it can be followed at home.• Be creative and include pictures and/or graphicso You may use clip art and other free images sources (Creative Commons).o If you use actual photos, please make sure you have permission from theindividuals to use them.• Since this is intended for a virtual platform, you should include links to examplesand resources.Requirements:• Submit the assignment in a Word Document.• You do not need to create a whole newsletter, just a news item

Topic: the impact of divorce on children social development* Your paper’s title AND a one (1) page description, explaining the importance of your topic or question (why does it matter) and outlining what you hope to focus your inquiry on. Scan the literature before you write this. Then be as specific as you can.* In selecting and framing your topic, you do not need to focus solely from a developmental perspective. At this stage, your selection should be guided by what developmental or social phenomenon is of interest to you and then narrowing or broadening that interest based on your scan of the literature.

In 1853, Sarah Josepha Hale published an important book from a Victorian perspective entitled “Woman’s Record: Sketches of all distinguished women from the creation to A.D. 1854.”  She believed, “The Bible is the only guarantee of women’s rights and the only expositor of her duties.  Under its teachings, men learn to honor her.  Wherever its doctrines are observed, her influence gains power…” (Severance, 2011, p. 259).Reference Book:  Feminine ThreadsRead the “Introductory – New and Old” (pages vii to x) in “Woman’s Record  ” by Hale  (https://archive.org/details/womansrecordorsk00hale/page/n7)Cover the following points related to this topic: Research some different descriptions of life during the Victorian Era1. What do you think of Hale’s view of men and women?2. What can be added to Hale’s insights?3. What were some of the positive features of the Victorian era that Hale described as happening during her lifetime?4. Compare and contrast Victorian culture with our modern culture. 5. What are some pros and cons of both cultures in regard to women?Support work with scholarly academic resources, textbooks, or other sources provided.  Quoting or paraphrasing from any source requires APA format by including an in-text citation and listing the reference as

Find one fascinating fact about the romantic landscape painting.  Be sure to include your detailed personal opinion.  One cited reference. MLA format.

TED Talk Response #1 – Tshering Tobgay on the melting of glaciers in Asia’s Hindu Kush HimalayaIn this TED Talk from 2019 (Links to an external site.), Tshering Tobgay the former Prime Minister of the small Asian country of Bhutan talked about the melting of glaciers in Asia’s Hindu Kush Himalaya mountains (where Bhutan is located).What mainly drew his attention to the melting of glaciers in the Hindu Kush Himalaya mountains?Why should Bhutan worry about such melting?What evidence does he present on the predicted/projected scale and timing of such melting?What does he suggest is the cause of such melting?Which other countries could be affected by the melting (and how exactly)?What solution does he suggest?Are there things about his talk that you think he fails to explain adequately?PLEASE NOTE:use the bulleted questions above as headings for your answers (this will not count in the overall word total)please have your headings in bold and the following text (i.e. your answer) in normal (non-bold) textdo not use more than 100 words per answer (so 700 words in total)this assignment counts for 50 pointsspellcheck your work before uploading it and, ideally, get someone to read it or listen to you explain itfeel free to include photos, diagrams, and screenshots to illustrate your points – any words in these are exempt fromthe word count.All images must be labeled although, again, these are exempt from the word count.upload your answer as a word document with a cover page stating your name, the course name, title of the work, my namethere is a transcript (write-up) of the talk here (Links to an external site.)you do not have to watch it but Tobgay also did a terrific TED Talk in 2016 (Links to an external site.) thatoutlines how Bhutan is the World’s only ‘carbon negative’ country.the ‘model answer’ for the previous course TED Talk on glaciers is in the modules section. It is much longer than the work expected of you but is worth looking at to get a sense of what a good answer looks like. It lacks a cover page but you do need to do a cover page.https://www.ted.com/talks/tshering_tobgay_an_urgent_call_to_protect_the_world_s_third_pole/up-next

Mapping the Controversy PromptBasicsIn this assignment, you will trace the argument around a controversial issue that affects or has affected the Clemson community; or another community which you have received permission from me to write on. You will not take a position on the issue at this time–that’s the next major assignment. Instead, you’ll conduct research on the historical conversation about a controversial issue to determine who the stakeholders are and what kinds of arguments they made/are making. What counts as “historical” will depend on your focus. If you are interested in arguments about desegregation at Clemson, for example, you’d need to look back at documents (for example, old issues of The Tiger in Tigerprints) from around 1963. If you are interested in arguments about development in the surrounding community, you don’t have to go as far back; you could instead focus on debates around particular developments and construction projects. The controversy you choose can build on what you wrote about in the Landmark Analysis, but it does not have to.What is a controversial issue?For our purposes, a controversial issue is an issue of public concern on which people disagree. To avoid going too broad, it can be helpful to frame your controversy as a question: for example, you could research something like “should Clemson build more bike lanes?” or “How can Clemson support green transportation?” rather than just “Clemson traffic.” A controversy should have more than two sides. Even if it looks like there are only two sides–for example, “yes, we should build more bike lanes” and “no, we shouldn’t”–there are probably more nuanced versions of each position to examine.For our purposes, the positions on this controversy do not all have to be what we would consider “reasonable” or well-argued. For example, if you are researching the debate about desegregation at Clemson, you are going to read some morally repugnant arguments. But, unfortunately, public discourse is not always reasonable, and identifying the issues in these debates–the problematic assumptions and values that they espouse–can help us better understand the stakes of these controversial issues.

As you have learned from several of your readings, diagnosis of a variety of psychiatric illnesses is not always an easy or straightforward process. Multiple observations and assessment methods are often employed to reach a diagnosis. This approach can include the use of standardized assessment instruments.Each week, you will be tasked with identifying a standardized assessment instrument to measure at least one of the disorders you will read about.  You identify an instrument and:Identify a scholarly, peer reviewed article that addresses the use of the instrument.Discuss if the instrument is appropriate for diagnosing the condition it is designed to assess, or if the instruments developers report that the instrument is only part of a comprehensive assessment for the condition.Describe whether or not the instrument can be used to measure patient response to therapy/treatment.Discuss the psychometrics of the instrument including reliability and validity.Discuss any limitations associated with the use of the instrument.For week three, you will identify at least two (2) assessment instruments-that can be used in the assessment/diagnosis of an anxiety or related disorder.Criteria    Ratings    PtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInstruments Assessed Using Scholarly Sources1 ptsAccomplishedIdentified scholarly/peer-reviewed articles for each instrument per assignment instructions.0.5 ptsProficientInformation obtained from a mixture of scholarly and non-scholarly/peer-reviewed sources.0 ptsNeeds ImprovementInformation obtained from non-scholarly/peer-reviewed sources.1 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssignment Content4 to >3.0 ptsAccomplishedall attributes of all instruments required for this assignment: 1- Is it designed to diagnose the condition, or is it to be used as part of thediagnostic process 2- Is the instrument can be used to measure patient response to therapy/treatment. 3- Psychometrics of the instrument, including reliability and validity. 4- Limitations associated with the use of the instrument3 to >1.0 ptsProficientDiscusses several attributes with one point being lost for each element omitted: OMITTED: 1- Is it designed to diagnose the condition, or is it to be used as part of the diagnostic process (minus 1 point) OMITTED: 2- Is the instrument can be used to measure patient response to therapy/treatment (minus 1 point) OMITTED: 3- Psychometrics of the instrument including reliability and validity (minus 1 point) OMITTED: 4- Limitations associated with the use of the instrument (minus 1 point)1 to >0 ptsNeeds ImprovementNone of the required attributes of the instruments have been discussed, or not all instrument(s) assigned were submitted (e.g., only submitted 2 out of 3 required assessment instruments, or 1 out of 2 required assessment instruments)4 pts

How did the article deepen and enrich your understanding of the science; what new insights did you gain from the article?How did the article deepen your understanding of the process of scientific advancement? OR Why is basic research, with no direct anticipated application, important?If you wanted to investigate further, what questions do you have for further research into this topichttps://cen.acs.org/physical-chemistry/chemical-bonding/hydrogen-bond-ends-covalent-bond/99/i2