Client Questions

look to files and red , then answer this questions.    6- How is CMC positioned relative to its competitors? 7- How should CMC create new and innovative approaches to community needs?

This is an assignment with a length of ten to twelve pages that should integrate the reading, multi-media and class discussion boards.  It is mandatory to have research from the classroom text, as well as three sources from the internet or online library to support your views. Consider the validity of your resources carefully before using them in academic papers.  It is recommended to use examples from your professional experience where possible, or build from your learning in the discussion boards.  Use at least one project you have been a team member or a project manager as an example to describe the topics below: The following topics must be reviewed in order for the paper to be complete: The definition of procurement and contract management and the importance to the business world. RFP selection tools and how to improve the assessment of proposals. The concept of procurement planning and various strategies necessary for project success. How to select the most qualified vendor in a proposal. Evaluation of the contract and the legal aspects of procurement in a project. Comparisons of the critical elements of a contract including relationships between the client, supplier, completion terms and payment terms. The final Research Paper for the course must be submitted by to the instructor by 11:59 p.m. of the time zone in which you reside on the last day of the class. Writing the Final Paper The Final Paper: Must be ten to twelve double-spaced pages in length, and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. Must include a title page with the following: Title of paper Student’s name Course name and number Instructor’s name Date submitted Must begin with an introductory paragraph that has a succinct thesis statement. Must address the topic of the paper with critical thought. Must end with a conclusion that reaffirms your thesis. Must use at least five scholarly sources, including a minimum of two from the Ashford Online Library. Must document all sources in APA style, as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.

Discussion Question Discuss the differences between non-parametric and parametric tests. Provide an example of each and discuss when it is appropriate to use the test. Next, discuss the assumptions that must be met by the investigator to run the test. Provide constructive, supportive feedback to your classmates’ posts. My topic is on immunization for kids under 5 years old in india and switzerland

Population Affected by Disabilities. Rural and Migrant Health  Read chapter 21 and 23 of the class textbooks and review the attached PowerPoint presentations.  Once done, answer the following questions. Mention and discuss the differentiation between the medical model and social construct definitions of disability. Identify and discuss selected health care and social issues that influence the ability of people with disabilities to live and thrive in the community. Mention and discuss the characteristics of rural community health nursing practice. Mention and describe the features of the health care system and population characteristics common to rural aggregates. As stated in the syllabus present your assignment in an APA format word document, APA required font attached to the forum in the discussion tab of the blackboard titled “Week 1 discussion questions” and the SafeAssign exercise in the assignment tab of the blackboard which is a mandatory requirement.  A minimum of 2 evidence-based references (besides the class textbook) no older than 5 years must be used.  You must post two replies on different dates to any of your peers sustained with the proper references no older than 5 years as well and make sure the references are properly quoted in your assignment. The replies cannot be posted on the same day, I must see different dates in the replies.   A minimum of 800 words is required and not exceeding 1,000 words (excluding the first and reference page).  Please make sure to follow the instructions as given and use either spell-check or Grammarly before you post your assignment. Please check your assignment after the week is due or after it is graded because of I either made comments or ask for clarification in some replies or the assignment that required your response.    Due dates:  Assignment – Wednesday, June 24, 2020, at 11:59 PM in the discussion tab of the blackboard, and in the SafeAssign exercise in the assignment tab of the blackboard.

Empirical Research Identification The purpose of this assignment is to understand the usefulness of evidence and the support it provides when answering a PICOT question. General Requirements: • Doctoral learners are required to use Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide. • You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Directions: Part 1: Empirical Article Selection Locate three empirical articles related to your PICOT question that meet all the criteria found on the “Empirical Research Checklist” resource. PICOT QUESTION: What is the impact of medication administration errors in pediatric patients? Part 2: Research Article Chart  Using the articles acquired in Part 1, provide a summary review of each component using the “Research Article Chart” template. ATTACHED

The ethos of scientism and postmodernism has exacerbated the perceived philosophical and cultural tension between science and religion. What is your perception of this tension? Use the lecture and the topic readings to support your response.

Should drugs with an astronomical cost be discussed with patients if the cost will not be covered? Who should decide who receives the drug if government decides to cover the cost?

Details: Based on “Case Study: Fetal Abnormality” and other required topic study materials, write a 750-1,000-word reflection that answers the following questions: What is the Christian view of the nature of human persons, and which theory of moral status is it compatible with? How is this related to the intrinsic human value and dignity? Which theory or theories are being used by Jessica, Marco, Maria, and Dr. Wilson to determine the moral status of the fetus? What from the case study specifically leads you to believe that they hold the theory you selected? How does the theory determine or influence each of their recommendations for action? What theory do you agree with? Why? How would that theory determine or influence the recommendation for action? Remember to support your responses with the topic study materials. While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

Discuss the value of qualitative research and ethical considerations related to this type of research.

Poor Patient Outcome Relying solely on the classic features of a disease may be misleading. That’s because the clinical presentation of a disease often varies: the symptoms and signs of many conditions are non-specific initially and may require hours, days, or even months to develop. Generating a differential diagnosis; that is, developing a list of the possible conditions that might produce a patient’s symptoms and signs — is an important part of clinical reasoning. It enables appropriate testing to rule out possibilities and confirm a final diagnosis. This case portrays a poor patient outcome after a misdiagnosis. Case scenario A previously healthy 35-year-old lawyer presents to a primary care office with a chief complaint of chest pain and a non-productive cough. The pain started suddenly 2 hours prior to coming to the office while the patient was sitting at his desk. The patient describes the pain as sharp in nature, constantly present but made worse with inspiration and movement, and with radiation to the base of the neck. His blood pressure in the right arm and other vital signs are normal. On physical examination the only findings of note are chest wall tenderness and a faint cardiac murmur. The ECG in the office is normal. The patient is observed for an hour in the office and assessed. He is diagnosed with viral pleurisy and sent home on non-steroidal analgesics. The following day the patient collapses at home and cannot be resuscitated by the paramedic service. An autopsy reveals a Type 1 aortic dissection with pericardial tamponade. Written Assignment: Developing a list of possible conditions that might produce a patient’s symptoms and signs is an important part of clinical reasoning. As an NP in primary care what would you have done differently? Discuss the importance of creating a list of differentials for this patient. How could it have changed this outcome? If a serious diagnosis comes to mind based on a patient’s symptoms: Ask yourself; Have you considered the likelihood of it and whether it needs to be ruled out by testing or referral? Because many serious disorders are challenging to diagnose, have you considered ruling out the worst case scenario? Ask yourself: Do you have sufficient understanding of the clinical presentation to offer an opinion on the diagnosis? What other diagnosis could it be? How might the treatment to date have altered the patient outcome? What other diagnostic and laboratory or imaging was needed in order to make a complete differential list?  What support tools would you consider using in helping to create a differential diagnosis list? Are you familiar with the current clinical practice guidelines for the investigation of a suspected condition such as chest pain? 5 pages