I don’t understand this Management question and need help to study.

Week 1 has been submitted and week 2 will be and to the same paper: see below

• Update the previously completed sections based on instructor feedback. (This part can not be done until I get feedback from the first paper)
• New Content (Week 2)
  • Research Methodology
    • Compare and contrast at least 5 current articles on the subject’s issue, and develop a review of the literature with discussions, findings, and conclusions.
    • Identify and explain your understanding of how to measure the current state of the problem issue using your own situation and the measures used in the literature you found using your own situation and the measures used in the literature you found.
    • Identify and explain your understanding of how to measure the success of the solution to the problem issue

I need support with this Writing question so I can learn better.

Assignment:

You must arrange to spend a minimum of four hours in a self-contained classroom of students with emotional and behavioral disorders or an inclusion classroom that contains students with emotional and behavioral disorders observing the teacher and the students and interacting with them. Your report of your observation should address the following questions separately and extensively:

Date and Time of the Observation

Description of the Setting:

? Community: Rural, urban, or suburban?

? School: Elementary, middle, or high school? How many total students are served at the school? What percentage of the student body receives special education services?

? Classroom: How is the room arranged? What are on the walls? Are there computers or learning centers in the classroom?

1. Description of Students and Teacher:

? Age, grade level, and gender of the students with emotional and behavioral disorders.

? What were the criteria for placement in this setting?

? What type of emotional or behavioral disorders do these students exhibit?

? Description/background of the teacher and an any other adults working with the students.

? What are their classroom duties of the other adults in the classroom?

2. Curriculum:

? What is the overall approach or combination of approaches being used in the classroom (e.g., Direct Instruction, Collaborative Learning, etc.)?

? What specific strategies are used for academic accommodations to the curriculum

? What specific strategies are evident for behavior management techniques

? Are there any individual behavior intervention plans (BIP) in place?

3. Reflection: (5 points)

? What new information did you learn from this observation?

? What, if any preconceived notions about students with EBD did you have going into this classroom?

? Were your ideas changed by this observation?

? What, if anything might you change or do differently if this was your classroom?

? What new information have you learned from your readings, literature review etc., that you could apply to teaching children with EBD in your future career?

4. Grammar: Punctuation, spelling, APA format, (4 points)

I need support with this Health & Medical question so I can learn better.

Develop 5 interview questions you feel you will be asked during an interview for a professional role or a role within a hospital.

1.Write what your response would be to each of the 5 questions you identified.

Post your questions and responses to discuss with the class. Answer the following questions in your response:

• What did you learn from your classmates? What strategies will you use to prepare for an interview?

Responses
Read and respond to at least two of your classmates’ discussion posts. Be constructive and professional with your thoughts, feedback, or suggestions. 125 words each

1.Why do you think that you are the right person for this position?

I am confident in myself and my work ethic to provide exceptional results. I am a hard worker that is disciplined enough to understand that success means dedication to the mission and being proactive and positive in working toward goals.

Tell me a little about yourself and your background?

As a professional, I am a person that is passionate about working and helping others. Being in a field that service others, it is gratifying to me to know that my service makes a difference. I enjoy being in a position where I can insert myself, apply my abilities and utilize the education that I’ve obtained over the years. Obtaining my degree at the University of Phoenix has prepared me with tools and resources that has broaden my mindset on the health care industry.

Where do you see yourself in 5 years?

In 5 years, I see myself established in an organization, preferably yours where I will be able to obtain growth by learning, engaging with others and participating in functions that will elevate my career and skill set in areas such as communication, leadership and management skills.

Why do you want to be a part of this organization?

I want to be a part of an organization that I feel that I align with the mission and values and I feel that this company is that match. I want to work for a company that has the passion and goals to better the lives of patients and creates a positive environment for the community. From my research, I’ve seen the footprint that your company has established in the community and I want to be a part of that.

What motivates you?

Helping others and making a difference in the lives of patients and their families motivate me to be a part of the medical community. As a health care professional, I want to be able to encourage and influence a positive culture and atmosphere for the people around me so that we can strive to be the best while servicing others.

2.

Question: 5 interview questions you feel you will be asked during an interview for a professional role or a role within a hospital

Tell me about yourself.

Give a broad overview of your work/educational history and throw in something outside of the job that you’re passionate about to let them know you’re interesting, not just qualified.

What made you interested in working here?

Be honest and show that you did your research. Always look up the company you are going to interview with. This shows that you are interested in the position and not wasting time.

What’s your biggest strength?

Choose a strength that aligns with what they’re looking for in an ideal candidate. (Reference the job description!) Always remember when interviewing with different hospitals your strengths may change depending on the job description you are interviewing with.

What’s your biggest weakness?

Be cautious but honest and let them know how you’re trying to improve. Don’t answer this question with a cop out answer such as “I’m a bit of a perfectionist.” Be honest with this answer as you could be working in a position that may strengthen your weakness.

What are your career goals?

With this answer you don’t have to get into your 30 year plan, but provide focus on the near future and incorporate the employer in those goals.

When I was hired in my current position of Supervisor these were the standard questions that I received. They don’t stray too far from any other industry but they seem to help narrow your qualities.

Reference:

https://info.nhanow.com/blog/healthcare-job-interview-questions-and-how-to-answer-them

Need help with my English question – I’m studying for my class.

Module 6 Assignment 6.1

• Due Jan 19 by 9:59pm
• Points 50
• Submitting a text entry box or a file upload
• Available Dec 29, 2019 at 10pm – Jan 19 at 9:59pm 21 days

Description:

Using the Learning Resource Center, Concorde’s resource library- https://www.galepages.com/miss22358 (Links to an external site.), and other academically appropriate sources compare contrasting attitudes on a controversial subject.

Objectives:

• Choose clear elements or features for comparison.
• Develop an essay with emphasis on comparison and/or contrast.

Instructions:

• Using APA formatting, in a 1- to 2-page paper, write an essay comparing two contrasting attitudes on a controversial subject. You may want to contrast your views with those of someone else, or contrast the way you felt about the subject in the past with the way you feel right now.
• Make sure you proofread and revise your essay before submitting.

Assignment Submission:

• The use of outside resources is strongly recommended, and all papers must be cited and written in APA format.
• Once you have completed the assignment, click the Submit Assignment option in the menu to the right and select a format for submitting your assignment.
• Click the Submit Assignment button when you are ready.

Rubric

Writing Assignments Rubric

Writing Assignments Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Assignment Ideas

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Assignment Development

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Organization

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Style & Mechanics

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Format

10.0 pts

Total Points: 50.0

I need support with this Writing question so I can learn better.

Using reflective writing as a critical thinking process, consider your researcher positionality as a doctoral-level qualitative researcher and offer a reflective discussion that encompasses four to five paragraphs:

1. After reviewing the Week 8 Resources and Figure 8.1, use writing-as-inquiry to reflect on the aspects of yourself as a scholar and qualitative researcher and begin to articulate how you would describe your own researcher positionality.
2. Review the five-course learning objectives (CLOs, see them listed again below) and assess the new learning you have gained in this course and how you will apply it to your future qualitative research design.
3. Reflect on the gains and challenges in this course experience, and evaluate the current state of your ability to offer a substantive rationale for the choice of the qualitative method for doctoral-level research and the justification of a specific qualitative research design to explore a focused educational problem.
4. Finally, consider the additional development you will need as you continue your coursework and your development as a doctoral qualitative researcher and your researcher positionality.

Length: 4-5 paragraphs (1–1.5 pages)

References: Optional

http://methods.sagepub.com.proxy1.ncu.edu/base/download/BookChapter/ethics-and-education-research/n6.xml

https://methods-sagepub-com.proxy1.ncu.edu/video/mapping-out-the-survey-research-process?clip=122184

https://journals-sagepub-com.proxy1.ncu.edu/doi/10.1177/1468794117714612

I don’t know how to handle this English question and need guidance.

You may have at some point in your life heard the word “rhetoric” used in the world of politics. Usually, when the word is used in terms of politics it has a negative connotation (a meaning more specific than it’s denotative meaning). Someone might say, “I don’t believe anything this president says. It’s all just rhetoric.” By this, they mean the politician’s words are an attempt to disguise the actual meaning or that there is no real meaning at all. However, the denotativemeaning of “rhetoric” is: the art of persuasive speaking or writing. In other words, it is the craft that goes into communication, whether that is persuading your friend to go out to the club, persuading your boss to give you a raise, or persuading your reader that the central argument of your essay is valid.

It is important as a developing writer to understand the techniques of academic writing (rhetorical devices) so that you can employ them effectively in order to prove the arguments you will make in your essays (and get a good grade). One of the best ways to continually learn the effective use of these techniques is to identify their use by published authors in the material you are asked to read for class. At the same time, you will not only be learning how to use rhetorical devices, you will also be better able to analyze the content of the work itself and evaluateits validity.

Here are some important areas to consider when analyzing an author’s rhetoric (we will discuss more techniques as the semester progresses):

Tone: a)The mood of a piece established by the author; b) The attitude of an author toward a given subject. When discussing an author’s tone, be as specific as possible with the words you use. For example, to say a tone is “angry” is not as specific as saying it is “frustrated” or “bitter”. In other words, what kind of “angry” is it?

Here is a link to a list of words you can use to describe a writer’s tone (or feel free to search for others online): Words to Describe a Writer’s Tone (Links to an external site.)

Diction: a)Word Choice – what specific words does the author use to create analogies, make subtle connections, or offer imagery? Take this line from the Gladwell piece: “The practice of prying into the minds and habits of American consumers is now a multi-billion dollar business” (94). The word “prying” has a connotation of doing something bad, like a criminal using a crowbar to pry into a locked door. This word adds more meaning to the sentence rather than just saying “look into”. b)Overall Language – does the language in the piece seem Formal(complex vocabulary, grammatically and syntactically correct according Standard Academic English)? Or does the language seem Conversational (using language that is common in everyday conversation)? Or does the language seem to employ Slang (very informal language that is usually only understood by a specific group of people).

Write two paragraphs (one on tone and one on diction) analyzing Steve McKevitt’s use of rhetoric in “Everything Now” (123). Use multiple examples to support what you say about the author’s use of tone and diction in their separate paragraphs. Be sure to explain what you think the effect of the author’s use of tone and diction is after giving examples.

Need help with my Business question – I’m studying for my class.

Instructions

To read the case study below, please click the link and log into the CSU Online Library.

Bodolica, V., & Waxi, M. (2007). Chicago food and beverage company: The challenges of managing international assignments. Journal of the International Academy for Case Studies, 13(3), 31-42. Retrieved from http://link.galegroup.com.libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/apps/doc/A166823446/ITOF?u=oran95108&sid=ITOF&xid=598691f1

Please answer the following questions after reading the case study:

1. Which staffing framework do you recognize in this case study? Explain its characteristics and the advantages to using this type of framework?
2. Would this type of staffing framework affect Paul’s ability to get things done? Why, or why not?
3. Explain if any of the other staffing frameworks would be any better? What can you recommend to the company’s headquarters in this sense?
4. Why does Paul want this job? Is Paul a good candidate for this expatriate position?
5. What comments can you make on expatriate management in general? And what comments can you make on the expatriate recruitment policy in particular?
6. What are the different expatriate compensation methods you recognized in the text? What are the advantages and disadvantages of these different expatriate compensation methods?
7. What do you suggest to the U.S. headquarters’ human resources manager in order to improve the expatriate satisfaction/compensation?

Your submission should be a minimum of three pages in length in APA style; however, a title page, a running head, and an abstract are not required. Be sure to cite and reference all quoted or paraphrased material appropriately in APA style.

I don’t know how to handle this Communications question and need guidance.

For this assignment, think back of a time where you think you used the wrong channel to convey a message to someone in your life. Examples could be sending a text message to break up with someone, or emailing a boss when in both situations you should have talked to them face to face.

In a 2-page paper, written using appropriate spelling/grammar, address the items below. Remember to be descriptive, and use as much detail in your examples as possible.

1. Describe the relationship you have/had with the person in the interaction.
2. Explain which channel you used initially and why you think it was the wrong means to communicate with them.
3. Explain which channel would have been better for the situation and why you think it would have been more effective.

I’m working on a Writing exercise and need support.

Now that we are done with the basics of communication as it applies to public speaking, this week we are getting into all the fine details … structure, outlining, delivery, presentation skills, word choices, language, etc. that can separate an okay speech from a great speech.

We refine our public speaking abilities through a mixture of instruction, practice, and imitation. As such, critically examining other speeches provides you another venue for thinking about how to adapt to different rhetorical situations. When we get into the persuasive and advocacy rounds, you will be required (and graded on) evaluating each other’s speeches (on paper and/or in a verbal critique after the speech – the ability to articulate a point in just a few seconds can be vital to surviving in the current employment market). So now is a great time to start practicing those evaluation skills.

For this assignment, we are going to start critically evaluating speeches. This will require 2 posts on your part (and watching at least 1 new TED talk).

• #1 Your initial post (1.25pts): Since you’ve already watched the speech you posted, that one should be easy. Go back to the TEDtalk you posted in last week (if you missed last week’s homework, you will have to go back and read it to know what we did). In your post for this week, re-post the link to the TEDtalk you posted last week but this week, rather than summarize, you need to evaluate the speaker’s delivery/performance (evaluate the speech, not the message!). Remember to provide the title and a WORKING LINK to the talk you evaluate in your post. For evaluation criteria see below.
• #2 Respond to one peer (0.75pts): Respond to one other person’s post, evaluating their posted TEDtalk (yes, you will need to watch their TEDtalk as well, you cannot evaluate the same speech that you responded to last week). Did you see things differently than they did in their evaluation? Do you agree or disagree with with their assessment of the speaker’s performance? Why or why not?

————————————————————————–

Criteria for evaluating speeches:

For this week, we are going to keep it really open-ended…. in your responses, discuss the following (350-500 words total)

What the speaker did well:

Most of these speeches have been practiced and refined over and over and over. What do you think the speaker did well? Did you learn anything by watching this speech (not about the topic, but about giving speeches)? Any tips or tricks that you may want to emulate in your own speeches?

What the speaker could still work on:

Every individual audience member will see/hear/interpret a speech in their own way. And, there is almost always room for improvement. If you were hired to give the speaker tips, is there anything you would tell him/her to do differently? Did you find anything distracting about the speech and/or delivery that you felt distracted from the message?

Things you may want to consider during your evaluations (which we will be covering in class all week). You can’t possibly talk about all of this in 350-500 words, these are just some suggestions for things you may want to look for, think about, and/or evaluate:

I don’t know how to handle this Health & Medical question and need guidance.

Prompt:

Write research paper on the following disease: Parkinson’s Disease

Introduction: Give an introduction on the disease. Present background information on the topic. Include background information and knowledge on the topic. Include statistics and data on the disease that is available.

Symptoms: Include information about any features or signs that indicate a condition of the disease.

Causes: Does the disorder arise because of a certain abnormality? What produces it or triggers the imbalance? How do you get the diease

Diagnosis and Tests: Include various techniques that can detected the diseases and how the illness can be identified.

Treatment: Incorporate the different types of medical care, drugs, techniques that can be used with dealing with the condition

Conclusion: Include all interesting information learned about the topic. This is where the previous information is summarized.

Format and Requirements:

Title Page

5 pages

12-point font

Double Spaced

Times New Roman

Include a reference page