Criminology

identify and describe 3-4 needs of the various populations served in the criminal justice profession. in responding be sure to identify and fully discuss any multiculturalism and diversity concerns. how does the criminal justice profession address the needs of a multicultural and diverse population? do you think that members of society are aware of the pertinent duties and responsibilities associated with the criminal justice profession? explain. what are the perceptions that society has about the profession? what can be done to remove the negative stereotypes associated with the profession? provide 2-3 examples to support your position.

One group will argue that special surveillance of citizens is warranted in a time of terrorist threats to the United States, and will be assigned to the Pro Debate Team. The other group will argue that the PATRIOT Act, secret searches and surveillance by the National Security Agency violate the Fourth Amendment and other civil liberties of citizens and will be assigned to the Con Debate Team. Note: I will hand-pick students and assign each student to a particular side. Each side will have to come up with a list of reasons to support the side they have been assigned and should cite sources to defend their position. In these debates, you should integrate discussions of the nature, forms and causes of terrorism. For the second week of the module, you will marshal your arguments in the group that you have been assigned. In the third week, you should come back to this document and argue your points with the other group. Each group should appoint a spokesperson who will outline the principle position of the group. Debate Instructions You will be requested to participate in an on-line pro/con debate in a discussion format after conducting ample research for whichever side of the debate you have joined. See below for details on how to proceed. Debate Topic Special Surveillance of Citizens: Justified in a time of terroist threat (Pro), or a violation of the fourth amendment and other civil liberties (Con)? You are required to read the following in preparation for the debate: First: Article Research and Analysis Research, select and analyze a minimum of 2 journal or website articles in support of your assigned position and 2 journal or website articles against your assigned position (knowing the cons if you are a pro will help you better prepare your arguments, and vice-versa). Post a 100 word analysis per article. Cite the articles using MLA. If they are from a website, you must include the URL in the citation. Second: Support Your Position as assigned, Pro or Con Use your articles and other resources to support your viewpoint. You will be assigned to a group posting area for either the pro or the con team. Then, go to the other side. Challenge someone’s argument. Be sure to use your references to support your challenge. This means that someone from the other camp will have challenged your original statement. Go back and refute that challenge by continuing to support your original position. Cite Sources: Please remember that if you reference a source, you must properly cite the source. If it is a web-based source, you can easily include the URL so other students can link to the resource.

In 3-4 paragraphs, explain the arrest and questioning procedures in regard to juveniles. Should juveniles be treated differently in these types of situations?  Cite sources

ANSWER EACH QUESTION WITH A PARAGRAPH Paragraph 1: What do you think is the most important factor affecting the collection of digital data and what impact do you think that this factor has on the ultimate quest for obtaining evidence in a criminal case? Paragraph 2: Why is it important to look for Big Data and how could it be used in enhancing or finding evidence in a criminal or civil violation investigation?

I am seeking a six-page essay on criminology with the focus being on crime trends in today’s society

300 words discuss deterrence, specific deterrence, and general deterrence.  Provide examples of each.  Please include proper citations.

In a 2 page paper, analyze in detail why Intelligence-led policing along with Compstat would be more effective at crime prevention than traditional crime control methods in communicating the problems of drug use and sales in a specific neighborhood. The analysis paper should include the following: Title page (not included in the page count) Section Headings Compare traditional crime prevention methods (reactive and not sharing information) to contemporary methods of information sharing, use of Compstat, and rigorously follow up for crime detection. Discuss how these two methods differ. List which method you believe would be most effective at reducing the criminal activity Reference page in APA format (not included in the page count)

In 2-3 well written paragraphs, explain the difference between the juvenile and adult court system. Cite sources

An employer temporarily suspended a police officer without pay on the ground that he saw his picture on a friend’s Facebook page drinking alcohol while wearing his police uniform. The employee denied that it was him in the picture and alleged that somebody digitally changed his face in order to defame him. Forensic experts were unable to ascertain whether the picture was tampered with. The employee already had a reputation of drinking excessively. At the last Christmas party he was noticeably intoxicated and had to be driven home by his coworkers. As an administrator, you are concerned with minimizing liability. You want to assure that employees are treated fairly, yet, at the same time, you cannot afford to have an officer who is out of control and is dishonest.   Please point to various aspects of the assigned readings for this week to support your point of view.   Next, please point to one aspect of the assigned readings that you found to be of particular interest. Be sure to explain why you found the point to be salient to the topic at hand.

In November (2016) voters in California failed to pass Proposition 62 that would have repealed the death penalty and approved Proposition 66 which is intended to speed up the death penalty process, clearly showing the majority of California voters still prefer the death penalty as an option. What do you think of the outcome of these propositions? Why? When Governor Newsom took office, he placed a moratorium on the death penalty in California. Do you think this decision is fair? Why or why not?