Education

Use the guiding questions/prompts to stimulate your thinking and guide your writing. How can the use of action research improve early childhood education practice? How does scientifically based research intersect with action research? Why is this important? How would your early childhood program or organization change if decisions were based on action research? What are key situations that using research-based decision making would help? Provide an example specific to your situation. Why are data collection and analysis critical to action research and decision making? What obstacles interfere with using action research to improve early childhood practice? How can they be overcome? What ethical considerations impact the use of action research for decision making in your early childhood program or organization? What can you do to implement the use of action research for decision making and improvement in your early childhood program or organization?

For this discussion, you will need to address the question below and be sure to participate fully by responding to your classmates as well. Citations should be used to support your analysis and references should be included in APA format. Before you begin, be sure to review the Discussion Question Guidelines! Productivity software (such as Excel or Google Sheets) is used by almost every business. Think in terms of your own field of study and future profession, in what ways could you use productivity software to increase efficiency in your work?

Note: In 1,500-2,000 words, describe the teaching experience and discuss your observations. The written portion of this assignment should include: 1. Summary of teaching plan 2.Epidemiological rationale for topic 3. Evaluation of teaching experience 4. Community response to teaching 5. Areas of strengths and areas of improvement

Hello,  I hope all is well. I am in high school and am applying to private schools. This essay is a draft in response to the following question: Describe an academic/ extracurricular achievement OR a challenge that had a meaningful impact on you. What did it take to accomplish the achievement or overcome the challenge and what did you learn from that experience? I would appreciate it if you revised what I have so far.  Thanks!

Write a 1,000-1,250-word essay. Choose three problems that Education policy at the state and local government levels are attempting to solve. For each problem, include the following information: Describe the problem and the policies that were put into place to address the problem. Explain how effective the policy has been at addressing the problems it was intended to solve. Explain any failures of the policy at addressing the problems it was intended to solve. Explain why the policies were successful or not. Recommend changes that could be made to the policy to make it more effective at addressing the problems it was intended to solve. Provide a rationale for the changes you recommend. Provide a minimum of three to five scholarly sources to support your analysis and conclusion.

Please read the following article: Lessons on the Craft of Scholarly Reading August 6, 2018 Scholarly reading is a craft — one that academics are expected to figure out on our own. After all, it’s just reading. We all know how to do that, right? Yes and no. Scholarly reading remains an obscure, self-taught process of assembling, absorbing, and strategically deploying the writing of others. Digital technology has transformed the research process, making it faster and easier to find sources and to record and retrieve information. Like it or not, we’ve moved beyond card catalogs, stacks of annotated books and articles, and piles of 3×5 cards. What hasn’t changed, however, is the basic way we go about reading scholarly work. In graduate school, we are told to “do the reading” and “know the literature,” in order to understand our field and master a particular corner of it. We do our best to absorb key sources and orient ourselves to the discipline so that we can demonstrate our mastery in preliminary exams, dissertation proposals, and literature reviews. Throughout our academic careers, that remains our mandate: Find the relevant  literature, make sense of it, and then use it in our own scholarly work. But how, exactly? Rookie scholars and established ones alike could benefit from a clearer, more detailed understanding of how to read effectively. For me, the craft of scholarly reading proceeds in three phases, each with goals and pitfalls. Phase No. 1: Gathering. To create a project bibliography, we need to define our chosen scholarly landscape. Where are its borders? What are its key features? Where are the controversies in our topic area? We also need to understand how the current topic landscape came into being: Which thinkers, ideas, debates, and divisions gave rise to these particular borders, features, and controversies? To “know the literature” is to find ways to become part of it. In this phase we read to figure out how the history of our subject area has shaped its current geography, both in general and in relation to our own particular concerns. This can be an exciting phase of discovery. Gathering sources should feel like a treasure hunt. You’re not doing deep reading at this point. You’re pursuing keyword searches and combing through bibliographies for clues to follow and trails to trace. During this phase we are trying only to determine the lay of the land — skimming and organizing the scholarly books and articles and the names of scholars we find, into categories we can use later. The goal: to create an evolving and open-ended assemblage of sources — a working bibliography. Phase No. 2: Engaging. Once we’ve gathered our main sources, it is time to interact with them closely and thoughtfully. That is the mark of a true scholar. Choose from your broad bibliography the specific books and articles that offer you the most interesting, surprising, disquieting, puzzling information. You’re seeking material that deals with your emerging research questions, so this is no time to skim. You’re not looking only for information that confirms your preconceptions, but also for the stuff that doesn’t. To be a serious scholar, you must always be open to the new or different, seeking to understand and do justice to relevant sources across a variety of perspectives. Your goal in this phase is to read, highlight, and annotate only the sources most relevant to your focus. You are trying to figure out what was (or is) at stake in the scholarship of others, so that you can accurately represent and engage these elements in your own work. This is when you can also start informal, responsive writing. I recommend doing quick synopses as you read — writing down concerns and questions, putting your own ideas into your own words. That way you actually will have begun writing in ways that support and shape your later work. Engaged, responsive reading helps you find and hone your own point of view in immediate response to that of other scholars. Phase No. 3: Deploying. Now you must figure out how to incorporate key elements of the literature into your own writing. Find ways — digitally or on paper — to identify and retrieve crucial quotes, ideas, and points of view. You want to make the insights of others available for your own future readers, as well as to demonstrate how your work connects with the work of other scholars in your subfield and discipline. Ideally, academic reading moves smoothly through those three phases, guiding and motivating you into productive academic writing. But in practice, there is plenty that can hamper you in the reading process. Here are some reading pitfalls: Beware of the impulse to start writing overly detailed outlines during the gathering phase. Doing so may decrease your anxiety and help you feel “scholarly.” But copious notes at this phase will keep you focused on trees when you should be getting a sense of the forest. Remember: Not all of the sources you’ve gathered deserve the same level of reading attention. First skim to grasp your research area’s history and geography, then read closely and annotate only the sources most relevant to your research questions. In the engagement phase, return to original sources whenever possible. Guard against the temptation to rely mostly on secondary sources, or to take sides based on your training or on current trends. In your reading, try to understand what predecessors in your area have actually said by tracking down original sources. Do not succumb to the temptation to distort, then demolish, the claims of selected others. You are contributing to a conversation, not taking sides or mowing down the competition. Show respect for those you cite by doing all you can to represent them accurately. In the deployment phase, avoid “cut and paste” scholarship, in which you assemble a jumble of quotes and paraphrases, hoping that a conglomeration of citations will substitute for analysis. It won’t. The possibilities you identify in this final phase of reading need to be judiciously used in the service of your own perspective. Your job is not to prove that you read all the relevant literature by quoting from it as much as possible. Instead, your job is to select relevant elements of the literature to anchor your own contributions. Remember that each of the three phases of “reading the literature” can turn into a form of writing avoidance. Don’t keep gathering, engaging, and annotating in the hope that your diligence will magically coalesce into scholarly writing. Watch out for those moments when you are starting to spin your wheels, superstitiously hoping that preparation will turn into writing through some form of alchemy. I describe warning signs of this in “The Myth of One More Source.” (Links to an external site.) As I say there, the point of a literature review is to learn from the literature, not to drown in it. Paraphrase each of the main three points in this piece. What advice did you find most helpful and/or are most willing to use in your research?

1. Summarize and evaluate the historical foundation of the field of special education, as well as related litigation and legislation. 2. Identify IEP and ARD procedures. 3. Discuss the components of the Individualized Education Program (IEP). 4. Discuss least restrictive and inclusive educational strategies.  5. Identify strategies for working with parents/families with different cultural and linguistic backgrounds. 6. Identify resources to support parents of students with disabilities. 7. Identify the laws that support the parents of students with disabilities. 8. Define intellectual and learning  9. Identify the prevalence of and causal factors related to both intellectual and learning disabilities. 10. Identify education approaches to assessing and teaching children with intellectual and learning disabilities.

For this week’s assignment, you will want to write 2-3 paragraphs answering the following questions: Describe a time when you could not reach an agreement with someone on a controversial issue. Did you try to compromise, combining your points of view so that each of you would be partially satisfied? Did either of you shut down communication? Was ending the conversation a good choice? Why or why not? Why is communication important when working through a controversial issue?

I am going to start my career in Kinesology so i wanna related to this field No 1 Discuss your motivation for pursuing a graduate degree. No 2 How will you make graduate studies a priority? (Be sure to address your dedication to persevere, your commitment to study time, and your network of support while in the program.) and no 3 Discuss how your experience relates to the program you are applying for and describe your current understanding of the field of study. the essay may not be longer than 1,000 words. here the information my university want please send in pdf file Essay Instructions The application essay is an important element in our decision to admit prospective students into CGHS programs. Graduate school requires exemplary critical thinking and writing skills and this essay allows the admissions committee to evaluate your abilities in both areas. The content (what you write) and form (how you write) is given significant weight in the admissions decision. It is essential that you take the time to think through your responses to the essay questions, organize your thoughts into a logical progression, and ensure that your sentence structure, grammar, and punctuation are correct. Since this is a sample of critical thinking and writing ability, the essay may not be longer than 1,000 words. Write out each question/statement in bold as a heading followed by your answer. This will make your essay easier to read and allows you to address each question specifically. CGHS seeks high quality individuals who are motivated to pursue their educational goals. CGHS seeks high quality individuals who are motivated to pursue their educational goals. Discuss your motivation for pursuing a graduate degree Successful completion of a graduate program for busy professionals involves dedication, time commitment, and support. How will you make graduate studies a priority? (Be sure to address your dedication to persevere, your commitment to study time, and your network of support while in the program.) 3. The admissions committee seeks to know how your experience (personal and/or professional) relates to the degree program to which you are applying and if you have an adequate understanding of the field of study. Discuss how your experience relates to the program you are applying for and describe your current understanding of the field of study. Discuss your motivation for pursuing a graduate degree. 2. Successful completion of a graduate program for busy professionals involves dedication, time commitment, and support. How will you make graduate studies a priority? (Be sure to address your dedication to persevere, your commitment to study time, and your network of support while in the program.) 3. The admissions committee seeks to know how your experience (personal and/or professional) relates to the degree program to which you are applying and if you have an adequate understanding of the field of study. Discuss how your experience relates to the program you are applying for and describe your current understanding of the field of study.

The field assignment requires that you go out into the field and observe the different ways people use listening concepts in their daily communication interaction. However, given the current pandemic, it may not safe to observe publicly how individuals show signs of listening components. Therefore, you may analyze a movie of your choice to observe similar encounters of the listening components based on the movie characters. Also, consider if there are differences in cultural groups on listen compared to other groups. Please type at least 2 pages, 12font, double-spaced essay. Worth 20 points. Objective: to learn more about the way people use different styles of listening. Also, to understand how these different listening concepts affect communication within cultural groups/norms. First, observe the way people are listening. Write about some of the concepts that show you that they are listening to one another (e.g. direct eye contact, asking questions, or empathy, paraphrasing etc). Your book lists more concepts. Second, observe any similarities and differences in how people of different cultures use listening styles. Are there any similarities or differences that you can observe among diverse groups? Based on your observation, was one person a stronger listener? Third, write about how did any listening inequalities impact the communication exchange? Also, write some solutions on how the people that you just observe can improve their listening skills or how one can improve their listening skills.