English

Requirements for Personal Essay: 4-6 pages A. A brief autobiographical sketch. Discuss your life up to now: your family, friends, home, work and community. We are particularly interested in those experiences most relevant to your interest in professional psychology and how those experiences have helped formulate your career goals (at least 3-4 pages). B. Since many different graduate programs exist, and the choice is such an important one, explain specifically why you have chosen to apply to the PsyD program at CSPP, and which aspects of CSPP, its programs, its approach to diversity, and its mission have attracted you to the school (1 page). C. What applied clinical problem would you most like to focus on in your PsyD studies and in the PsyD clinical dissertation/doctoral project? Tell us something about your knowledge of the relevant theory and concepts, research, and the application of that scholarship to clinical practice. (1-2 pages) D. In what emphasis, proficiency or academic area would you choose to concentrate your studies at CSPP? Please relate this to your career goals.

I have attached a file that has my writing and URL for the article. Please read the article and rewrite each reading response with 400 words each. There are 4 reading responses and need to be rewritten. The following instruction is below: Details  Your reading responses should show that you’ve thought deeply about the readings you’ve chosen. You have plenty of freedom in shaping your writing to match the concepts, issues, and experiences that you find meaningful. As a helpful starting place, these are a few guidelines you may use as you plan and compose your reading responses.  Summary. Provide a short overview of the main points and purpose of the reading. How do you understand the author’s or authors’ main claim(s)? Why was this piece created and what does it aim to accomplish?  Application. Think about how the reading could be useful in real life, outside of reading it for class. How have you seen the principles or concepts from this piece at work in your own experience, or how might you imagine they would work? What other connections do you see between the principles or theories in this piece and your own experience, your work, or the kinds of work that you are familiar with?  Critique. Engage in a critical discussion using some aspect of the chapter or article that prompts you to agree or disagree with the author’s perspectives or claims. Why do you agree or disagree with the claims this reading is making? What evidence or reasoning can you bring in to support your side?  Quotation and reflection. Identify a quoted passage (or a few short passages) from the piece that stands out to you and/or elicits in you some type of emotional response. Include a few lines explaining why the quoted section(s) feel(s) so meaningful for you.  Noticing the remarkable. Describe or point to any else that surprised or delighted you about the piece. Did you learn something you had never thought about before? Was there a particularly fascinating data point or conclusion drawn?  Asking questions. Share any questions or concerns that this piece raises in your mind. What do you wish you understood more clearly? What issues or concepts might you want to think or wonder more deeply about?  It isn’t required that you do all six of these for each response, but you’ll likely include at least two or three. For example, you may decide to summarize and critique one of the readings, with a few questions at the end of your post. For the next reading, you may decide to quote a significant passage and respond to that quote with your own thoughts or a connection you see between your own experience and the article’s main points.

What is the moral in these variants of “Cinderella”? How do gender roles and social class stereotypes get both reinforced and resisted in the tales? Looking closely at and engaging with Maria Alcantud-Diaz’s articlePreview the document, examine the critic’s thesis and discuss your opinion on her argument about power and violence, especially with regard to gender roles in “Cinderella.”Note: This day begins the longer posts, reflecting on the primary and secondary readings—here, the “Cinderella” variants and the critical piece on “Cinderella”—

write about why you think the Arthurian myth is still an important part of our culture. As you write, use at least one book and one film from the course, though you are welcome to use more.

An argumentative essay is built around a specific statement known as the thesis or conclusion that is debatable. The focus of an argumentative essay is a statement with which your readers may disagree. Your essay will need to support that statement in a manner that convinces your readers of its truth.  What makes a statement debatable or non-debatable? These points should help explain the difference between debatable and non-debatable statements.  Debatable statements:  Statements with which other people might or might not agree. These are sometimes called “arguments,” “assertions,” “propositions,” “claims,” or “conclusions.”  Non-debatable statements: Statements with which no one would normally disagree or argue. These are sometimes called “facts.” If you are writing a paper about a non-debatable statement, then perhaps you are just writing a report.  The introduction to an argumentative essay generally has four parts.  Introduces the topic States why the topic is important States that there is a difference of opinion about this topic  Describes how the assignment will be structured and clearly states the writer’s main conclusion The concluding paragraph or closing of an argumentative essay is as important as the introduction. The concluding paragraph closes the essay and tries to close the issue. The aim is to convince the reader that your essay has covered all the most important arguments about the issue and that your main conclusion is the best position on the issue.  1. Restates the main conclusion that you proposed earlier. 2. Presents one or two general sentences which accurately summarize your arguments. 3. Provides a general warning of the consequences of not following the conclusion that you put forward and/or a general statement of how the reader or the wider community would benefit from following your conclusion. Check the body of your essay for the following things:  1. Do any of your paragraphs present arguments that oppose your main conclusion? 2. Do any of your paragraphs present arguments that support your main conclusion as non-debatable or as facts? 3. Have you clearly marked any places where you shift from the opposing arguments to the supporting arguments with a contrasting connective (such as “however”)? 4. Have you used connectives, pronouns and referencing words (such as “this” or “these” to make your paragraph cohesive?

For this assignment, you will compare and contrast two resume templates from Resume Genius. Each is an acceptable format for a resume; each has benefits and drawbacks. To access a resume template, click on the Classic resume template link from Resume Genius and the Professional Profile resume template link. After performing your evaluation of the resume templates, write a 500- to 800-word essay answering the following questions: Compare two or three resume templates on Resume Genius, including the Classic style. Which template do you think is the best to use and why? Which template is the most professional? Why? Is it appropriate to use colors? Why or why not? Does a resume need to explicitly contain the heading, Career Objective? Is this element necessary at all? What elements should an ideal resume include? What are some changes you would make to the Classic template? Classic resume: https://resumegenius.com/resume-templates/basic-templates Professional resume: https://resumegenius.com/resume-templates/professional-templates

Answer the questions below in complete sentences. You may consult your Journeys anthology while writing your responses. 1.      Why might Sonnet 18 by Francesco Petrarcha be interpreted as a poem about defeat as much as a poem about love? Use specific examples from the text in your response. Answer: 2.      Read Sonnet 130 by William Shakespeare now. It is located on page 73 of your Journeys anthology. What elements of this sonnet are unusual? Where is the volta, or turn, in the poem? How does the poem change at the volta? What is the central theme of the work? Answer: 3.      Read Sonnet 13 by Elizabeth Barrett Browning now. It is located on page 76 of your Journeys anthology. What does this poem say the beloved wants the speaker to do? How does she respond to his request? What does her response suggest about her and about her feelings for her beloved? Use examples from the text in your response. Answer: Type your answer here.

I need abstract written . I  also highlighted everything in  yellow that need to be corrected and revised in the essay . I attached a copy of the essay through  word document .  Introduction: Identify the issue. Provide the necessary background and/or important recent developments. Define key terms and concepts. Engage the reader and explain the broader significance of the issue. Arguments and Counterarguments: Summarize the best arguments on both sides of the issue. Include relevant research from credible sources used to support each conclusion. Devote at least one paragraph to each side. Evaluation of Critical Thinking: Assess the strength of the arguments and the quality of thinking surrounding this issue. Identify weaknesses in critical thinking such as fallacies, rhetorical devices, vague language, and cognitive biases. Provide specific examples of how these weaknesses appear in arguments you encountered, using terminology and definitions from the course. Be specific! Present evidence from your sources that show these fallacies/biases being used.

After reading Rachel’s chapter, watching the video, and after listening to the lecture discuss with your classmates: If we take away all rules and regulations are we really going to regress to the State of Nature described by Hobbes? Discuss what you think it would happen if we had no laws and moral standards. 200 Words Minimum  Textbook is linked as file Please watch youtube video and read Chapter 6 in textbook

A city council is debating the adoption of a 10 P.M. weekday curfew and a midnight weekend curfew for teenagers. If the curfew is adopted, teenagers on the streets after those hours would be breaking the law. Do curfews keep teenagers out of trouble, or do they unfairly interfere in young people’s lives? Take a position on this question. Use reasons and specific examples to support your views. Argument essay.