English

Respond in writing to these items: 1. Discuss the two prominent Prohibitionists arguments the Hummer dismisses in his essay. In your consider how an entity such as an insurance company might respond to Huemer’s dismissal. What type of moral argument would the insurance company use? Discuss. 2. What do you think of Marneffe’s argument for the decriminalization of drug? Do you agree with his logic related to the related to the problems of legalization? Discuss. 3. Explain how Shapiro Alternate View of Addiction is a consequentialist approach to the problem. Discuss what he means by human being “interpretative animals” in regard to each of the 3 components of the Alternative View.

Develop a two- to three-page APA- formatted paper that responds to the following: Provide a review of the article. Describe the impact of workplace bullying on both the victims and the organization. Reflect on a time when you may have witnessed workplace bullying. Discuss at least two practices of workplace bullying addressed in the article that were applicable to your scenario. Recommend at least two techniques from the article that management should implement to provide a positive impact on workplace bullying. Support your response with additional information from the textbook or additional research. Your paper must be two to three pages (not including title and reference pages) and must be formatted according to APA style as outlined in the approved APA style guide. You must cite two scholarly sources in addition to the textbook. Carefully review the Grading Rubric (Links to an external site.) for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment

Paper 1: Why is the concept of family health important ? Consider the various strategies of health promotion . How does a nurse determine which strategy would best enable that target individuals to gain more control over and improve , their health ? Paper 2: What is a definition of family that encompasses the different family structure prevalent today . Discuss the importance of Acknowledging non traditional family structure . Explain systems theory can be used to better understand the interactions of a modern family ( tradition or non traditional .

Essay 4: New Myth Buster Argument Identify and investigate a claim based on “conventional wisdom,” popular stereotype, or current “consensus.” Examine and evaluate the reasons and evidence given to support the claim. Can you detect any logical fallacies connecting the evidence/reasons to the claim? Uncover the assumptions underlying the claim and determine the validity or invalidity of those assumptions. Conclude whether you think the claim is true, false, or undetermined. If you conclude that the claim is true, discuss what motives and other factors might influence people to deny the claim. If you conclude that the claim is false, discuss what motives or other factors might influence people to believe or perpetuate the claim. If your conclusion is undetermined, discuss both sets of possible motives and other factors. Analyzing your topic closely and considering historical precedents will aid you in this assignment. Incorporate into your argument two outside sources, at least one of which must be scholarly. Deborah Tannen’s “Who Does the Talking Here?” (Read, Reason, Write, 8-11) serves as a useful model for this option. Following is a partial list of common claims to help get you started:  males and females are fundamentally the same, males and females are fundamentally different, conservatives are greedy and closed-minded, liberals are compassionate and tolerant, fascism is a “right-wing” phenomenon, religion causes wars, science is antithetical to religion, “climate change” is going to destroy the planet in the next ten years, endemic racism pervades America’s police departments, capitalism is inhumane, socialism is fair, there is a 30% wage gap between men and women, human nature is inherently good… Minimum Length Requirement: 900 words (roughly three pages typed and double-spaced with one-inch margins)   Sources: Integrate into your text information and/or ideas from two outside sources, at least one of which must be scholarly. Following correct MLA format, you must cite (quote and/or paraphrase) each source at least once in the body of your essay and document each source at the end of your essay on a separate Works Cited page.

The paper needs to be written as a research paper outline. The topic is :How Does PTSD Affect Nurses. WRITE IN OUTLINE FORMAT

Please see attached.  4 Topics to choose from. Please use transitional words.   What constitutes a Homeric hero? What values and qualities are most prized in the Iliad? Conversely, what is devalued?   What “subversive, yet progressive” roles do women play in the Greek texts assigned this term?   How do the Greek texts assigned this semester define “justice” in view of what it means to be “human.”  Write your narrative on how these works differ on their views of “justice” and what it means to be “human.” Imagine that you are an ancient Greek who has been transported from fifth century BC Athens to AD 2020 Houston.  You are able to communicate to your fellow Athenians via the internet. Write a letter to your compatriots commenting on what you think is the Houstonian view of justice and what it means to be human. Make sure to include enough references to the works that you read this term so that your letter will make sense to a fifth century BC Athenian.

Write at least 150 words in response to the questions located in the discussion assignment by the assigned due date. What was your reaction to the different stories Phillips told in the video? What do you think is significant about the science of storytelling? Has it changed the way you view or will write your narrative essay? Can you find any more sources that support the science or importance of telling stories? Remember to provide appropriate citations for any outside sources you use

Instructions Please, submit your paper according to the following guidelines. 1. Make sure to include the word count at the top of your paper. 2. Please, note that you have to submit a hard copy of your paper on January 3rd, 202. Please print in this format: Times New Roman, 12, double-spaced. 3. Please, implement the use of textual analysis in your essays. Note that using at least 1 or 2 quotes for each paragraph, for a total of at least 4 quotes per page could be ideal. Quotes should not be too long; they should be introduced and contextualized. Add references and pages. 4. Please note that videos and documentaries can be quoted, but do not count as one of the 3 required sources. Thanks. TITLE Please, note that this shall be a theoretical and historical paper, but also a creative one. 1. Human Enhancement: Pros and Cons. Please, locate yourself in the bioethical debate on human enhancement. Are you in favor? Are you against? Are you only supporting some cases, and against other cases? What kind of regulations would you implement? Please, sustain your argument using at least three texts read in class in the first part of the course.

(Masdar City) discuss certain issues that came up, climatisation, notions (and critique of sustainability), the role of technology, and here especially the question of crisis and survival as Gunnel put it, from and urban and also from an architectural point of view. What is smart about it, and what is traditional? What was promising, and why did it fail? You to account for the different actors and stakeholders involved? (I have enclosed some reading and book, but you should do much further research and find more sources) The essay should develop a consistent argument of central themes, ideas and subjects, and include a significant bibliography of primary and secondary literature. It should be approximately 3,500 words long and include a substantial set of 10 to 15 illustrations, specially produced or carefully selected, extensively discussed in the text and precisely referenced in a separate list. In the marking of the essay, substantial analysis and critical thinking will be valued more than mere description. In more detail the evaluation criteria, which ensure that all students across the different electives are assessed on the same basis, are as follows:30% Content: Depth of the research undertaken; Knowledge and understanding of the subject; Relevance of the material used; Clarity with which the information is presented (both text and images)30% Argument: Sophistication and depth of the analysis; Logic and robustness of the argument; Organisation and communication of ideas with evidence (both text and images) 20% Referencing: Extent to which the essay is supported by research evidence; Use of established referencing systems; Awareness precents (creative projects)20% Presentation: Clarity of writing; Correct use of English language; Graphical and presentational skills; Extent to which illustrations support the argument

Argumentation Essay Write a 750-1000 word argumentation/persuasion essay using any approach as a method of development. You MUST cite a minimum of two references/sources. Research is REQUIRED for this essay. An effective argumentative essay must have evidence to make its case; most arguments that occur in daily life happen in the heat of the moment and are more likely directed toward saving one’s own pride than toward giving clear and supportive proof to one’s claims. Writing Approach Knowing how to brainstorm is going to save you from writing a weak essay. Also, knowing how to support your claims with evidence from outside sources will further strengthen your essay. For that reason, this assignment requires the use of two references/sources. In addition, you will add a Works Cited page at the end of your essay. Finally, your Works Cited page will be in MLA (Modern Language Association) format so that all information provided will be easy for your reader to find. Before attempting this essay: Review all of the chapter sections located in Lessons 6 and 7. Review the available documents and sources located at the Helpful Resources folder on the course menu. Writing Assignment Purpose: to persuade Method of Development: your choice Choose your own topic, but make sure that it is something that can actually be argued.  You cannot argue something that is a fact. You can argue for or against something. Some examples are: Should teenagers be able to play violent video games? Should cellphones be allowed in the classroom? Is social media destroying the way we communicate? The above items can be argued but there are many others to choose from. The choice is yours. If you have something in mind but you are unsure if it will work as an argumentative/persuasive essay, please send me a message through the Messages link for assistance.  Reminders: Brainstorm for topics. Choose one topic, choose a method of development, and organize all details accordingly. Research for appropriate evidence to support your argument. While you are researching, be sure to note all information necessary to fill out your Works Cited page for that entry. Remember your conclusion and your Works Cited page in MLA format. Check the syllabus for due dates.