English

It’s college level writing. The assigned reading suggest that technological advances can have negative as well as positive effects on their users, explain why the author thinks the pros of the technology they write about outweigh the cons or vice versa, and explain why you agree or disagree with the author’s opinion.

In a 3 pp. essay, identify and discuss the types of appeal (ethos, logos, and pathos) and at least five other rhetorical techniques that the following author uses in her essay: Judy Brady, “I Want a Wife,” Your overall argument should be about the author’s thesis. The discussion of the three (3) appeals and five (5) additional techniques will support your thesis and show HOW the author makes their argument. Essay Requirements Format 3 pp. of text in APA style Double-spaced 12 point Times New Roman Font Use quotations and citations. Include a title page (separate 1st page) Include a references page (separate 5th page) Follow the APA Cheat Sheet. Content Identify the essay’s subject, tone, purpose, audience, and thesis Discuss the types of appeal: ethos, logos, and pathos Discuss at least five other rhetorical techniques

Based on the film you chose in Final Paper: Movie Review Selection, write a 5-6 page review, including a detailed and insightful discussion that includes the following: Give the title of movie, a short summary of the movie’s plot and main characters. Provide a summary of the disorder portrayed in this film and describe the character in the movie with that disorder. Indicate which DSM criteria were and were not portrayed in the film. Were there other disorders that might be diagnosed? Which ones and why? Were any causes of the disorder suggested in the film? If so, what? If not, what do you think best explains that causes of their disorder. What types of treatment, if any, did the person in this film receive? Provide specific examples. Is this form of treatment typical? Was it effective? If they received no treatment, what do you think they would have benefited from? Analyze the portrayal of the disorder by the character in the movie. Was the disorder portrayed accurately? Explain. Were the problems portrayed by the character true to the disorder? Explain with examples from the movie. Were the reactions of the other actors to the character realistic/authentic? Provide examples. Would you recommend it to others wanting to learn about the disorder? Why/why not? Submit your assignment to Turnitin. Give yourself enough time to revise and resubmit ahead of the due date. By the due date indicated, upload your final paper.

What happened to family’s through the process of assimilation

Introduction to Philosophy Final Paper Prompt        Due Monday January 4th by 4:00 PM EST For your final paper, pick one of the following questions related to the different philosophers we have been discussing the past 4 weeks: 1.      Compare Plato’s use of similes to show that there are levels of knowledge with John Stuart Mill’s more “ordinary” argument regarding levels of knowledge in judgments of quality. Which approach seems most compelling, if does? Explain. 2.      Some philosophers doubt that we really do have a clear and distinct (precise) idea of God. Reflect on the idea of God. Is it clear and distinct? Do you have a clear and distinct idea of perfection—in beings or automobiles or marriages or anything? Does Descartes’ argument? 3.      Do you think morality must disappear if everything we do can be explained according to scientific laws and patterns? Could there be another kind of morality based on laws of behavior and biopsychology? Why or why not? What is lost in the purely scientific view of humanity, of personhood? Anything important? Explain. 4.      Do you think that the presence of a perspective makes a neutral stance impossible? What do you think neutral means in this kind of case? Does it mean perspectiveless? If it means something else, what else? Are perspectives the same thing as biases?   Try to develop a strong set of reasons aimed at convincing the reader of your paper (me, the professor) that your view is correct. Make use of the different theories presented by the authors studied over the semester, as well as additional readings on the topic (some of these can be found in the bibliography at the end of the textbook), to support your position.   à Your paper should be at least 4 pages double spaced, in Times New Roman 12 pt. font with 1” margins. Be sure to include an introduction and conclusion that state your thesis (the general claim you are defending in the paper) and that summarize the supporting points you will be making. Please include a works cited page at the end of your paper. Any format for the works cited page is okay if it is consistent throughout your paper.   Also, when in doubt, cite a source! Even if you are not quoting a text directly, be sure to include a note of the author and date for any paraphrasing of statements, or even the mentioning of ideas, that come from another source. Using the ideas or written material from an outside source without citing it constitutes plagiarism and will lead to a failing grade on the assignment. In text citations at the end of any sentence using material from another source are the best way to successfully point out the use of an outside source in the paper. These citations should look like the following (Last Name, year) or, for example, (Fosner, 2018). The full bibliographical information for any outside source should appear on the works cited page at the end of your paper. Please email me if you have questions about citations or what constitutes plagiarism!   This assignment will be graded based on the following four factors:   1. Completeness: Have all parts of the prompt been answered?        2. Accuracy: Have the course texts been accurately represented? Is the discussion of philosophical theories and concepts accurate? 3. Insight: Have novel and interesting points been made? Is your own view clearly expressed? 4. Style: How easy is the paper to read? How clear and concise is the writing?

–       summary of/reflection upon one concept from the weekly reading: –       Identify and summarize the concept. –       Identify the main assumptions or taken-for-granted perspectives underlying that concept (e.g., What are the unstated ideas underlying the author’s thinking?). –       Discuss the implications/consequences of this concept (i.e., What are the implications if we take this line of reasoning seriously? What are the consequences if people ignore the author’s reasoning?). Will provide details to access online book

ENGL102 ASSIGNMENT 2020 Choose ANY TWO essay topics, out of the four listed below, and write a ONE page essay based on your selection. Submission date: Length: Font: follows: “Whatever happened [Clover] would remain faithful, work hard, carry out the orders that were given to her, and accept the leadership of Napoleon. But still, it was not for this that she and all the other animals had hoped and toiled. It was not for this that they had built the windmill and faced the bullets of Jones’s gun. Such were her thoughts, though she lacked the words to express them” (Orwell, 1945: 34) Using this statement as a starting point, discuss Orwell’s satirical depiction of political power in Animal Farm (1945) by highlighting how the pigs maintain control of the other animals. In your answer, provide examples from Chapter 7 (VII) to illustrate your response. You may consider in your analysis: • What satire is, and how Orwell employs it in this story to demonstrate the corrupting influence of power/control. • The pigs’ use of violence/displays of violence and what these achieve. • The pigs’ use of propaganda and control of language to maintain power over the other animals (it may be useful to focus on Squealer and his function in the story) • The other animals’ responses to the pigs’ methods of control and whether or not these methods are effective. This assignment requires a close-text reading of Chapters 7 (VII), so please avoid general responses. These points are only there as a guideline, so please do not answer in point form. Total: 100 10 December 2020 500-600 words MAXIMUM, PER ESSAY. Times New Roman; 1.5 Spacing; Size 12 Animal Farm (1945) Read the following extract from Chapter 7 (VII) of Animal Farm and answer the question that ESSAY TOPIC 1: ESSAY TOPIC 2: Fight Club (1996) In a conversation with his co-worker, the Narrator explains: “I just don’t want to die without a few scars, I say. It’s nothing anymore to have a beautiful stock body. You see those cars that are completely stock cherry, right out of a dealer’s showroom in 1955, I always think, what a waste” (Palahniuk 1996: 27). Using this statement as a starting point, discuss how Fight Club satirises modern masculinity. You may consider in your analysis: • What satire is, and what function it serves • What type of look/ behaviour modern masculinity encourages (according to the novel) • A male character who is satirised • The link between violence and a functional, or practical, masculinity This assignment requires a close-text reading of Chapters 2 to 7, so please avoid general responses. These points are only there as a guideline, so please do not answer in point form. Total: 100 ESSAY TOPIC 3: Young Blood (2010) Using the quotation below as a starting-point, write a 1 page essay in which you explain why Sipho’s relationship with Nana is so important/sacrosanct in his terms, that is, despite his involvement with a number of other (perhaps more ‘exciting’ or ‘available’) young women? “Girls with brains want it to mean something.” Total: 100

The repeating first and third lines of Elizabeth Bishop’s poem “One Art” claim that “The art of losing isn’t hard to master” and that “loss is no disaster.” How does the rest of the poem support or contradict thise claims? How does the theme of loss in this poem relate to at least ONE other worked assigned in this class this term? (The another poem is “Rime of the Ancient Marinen”) This can be short, a least 1 paragraph!! I really need this before 4:10 pm today 🙂

this short video on technical communication and answer the following questions.Would you add anything to the author’s definition and explanation?How do would you define technical writing as of today (Please do not say that it is “writing that is technical,” though.)? Provide a few examples of how you have already encountered technical writing in your day thus far.

For this essay, you will select one of the sources you have found through your preliminary research about your research topic. Which source you choose is up to you; however, it should be substantial enough that you will be able to talk about it at length, and intricate enough that it will keep you (and your reader) interested. In order to foster learning and growth, all essays you submit must be newly written specifically for this course. Any recycled work will be sent back with a 0, and you will be given one attempt to redo. The introduction of this paper will involve introducing the source: Provide the author, the title, and the context (where you found the source, where it was originally published, who sponsored it, etc.) You will then go on to evaluate the source on two levels: Credibility: Using the information in this unit as a guide, evaluate the source’s authenticity and reliability. Look at all the information that you can find about the source to establish the author’s (or sponsor’s) trustworthiness. Usefulness: Using a combination of summary and analysis, examine the source on a critical level. Determine what the source’s purpose (thesis) is, and how it arrives at that goal. Examine its value to you and the project you are working on. How will it help you prove your own points? How might it come in handy to back up a claim (or address a counter-claim)? Finally, you will include a conclusion which shows your final assessments on both counts. A. Assignment Guidelines DIRECTIONS: Refer to the list below throughout the writing process. Do not submit your essay until it meets these guidelines. 1. Source Identification The introduction of this paper will be introducing the source: ? Have you provided the author’s name? ? Have you provided the source title? ? Have you provided the context (where you found the source, where it was originally published, who sponsored it, etc.)? 2. Source Evaluation ? Have you provided a judgment on the source’s credibility? ? Have you used specific examples from the source to illustrate your judgment on credibility? ? Have you provided a judgment on the source’s usefulness? ? Have you used specific examples from the source to illustrate your judgment on usefulness? 3. Reflection ? Have you answered all reflection questions thoughtfully and included insights, observations, and/or examples in all responses? ? Are your answers included on a separate page below the main assignment? B. Reflection Questions DIRECTIONS: Below your assignment, include answers to all of the following reflection questions. What types of questions did you ask yourself when evaluating the credibility and usefulness of your source? (2-3 sentences) How do you feel this evaluation practice will help you as you continue to move through the research process? (2-3 sentences) D. Requirements The following requirements must be met for your submission to be graded: Composition must be 2-3 pages (approximately 500-750 words). Double-space the composition and use one-inch margins. Use a readable 12-point font. All writing must be appropriate for an academic context. Composition must be original and written for this assignment. Plagiarism of any kind is strictly prohibited. Submission must include your name, the name of the course, the date, and the title of your composition. Include all of the assignment components in a single file. Acceptable file formats include .doc and .docx.