[ORDER SOLUTION] Essay Drafting Process

Read the “Brainstorming” article above and write and submit a brief reflection (two or three paragraphs) about it. How do you normally approach “prewriting” or generating ideas or material before the actual essay-drafting process? Have you used any of the strategies described in the UNC article? Which strategies seem like they would be most (or least) useful? “Brainstorming”404823a few seconds agohttps://writingcenter.unc.edu/tips-and-tools/brainstorming/

Read more

[ORDER SOLUTION] Philosophical Theory

Choose ONE of the following topics: Philosophy in Books and Film Select a philosophical theory or movement that we have covered in class. Relate it to a book, short story, film, play, or other media. Show how key concepts from the theory are illustrated in your chosen medium. Be sure to really incorporate the theory into your work (this is not simply a book report or movie review; your focus must be on the philosophical theory). ? Examples: Read Viktor Frankl’s Man’s Search for Meaning and pull out existential themes. Descartes’ doubt experiment and Shutter Island. ? Remember, you must include direct quotes from our textbook and cite from our textbook ? Remember the 60/40 rule. At least 60% of your paper should focus on philosophy with no more than 40% discussing the story. Evolutionary Robotics Read John Searle’s “Is the Brain’s Mind a Computer Program?” (available on Moodle). Then check out Josh Bongard’s “Star Robot.” After summarizing (without injecting your opinion) both works’ opposing points, finish by explain who you think is right and why. Suggested Outline: • Explain Searle’s arguments why computers can not become self-aware and conscious • Explain Bongard’s arguments why computers can become self-aware and conscious • Finally, what do you think and why? • Remember, you must cite from Searle’s article Star Robot article: Interview with Bongard about Evolutionary Robotics: Cartoons and Choice Watch the RSA Animate-Choice clip found on Moodle. Compare (show similarities) between key terms in the video and Sartre’s essay “Existentialism.” Terms in the video to pay attention to: feeling “overwhelmed and horrified” by choices, anxiety and guilt, frozen in indecisiveness, and choice involves loss. Don’t forget to relate these terms to Sartre’s essay and his own definitions of anguish, forlornness, and despair. The You Tube address: ? Remember, do NOT get caught up in her discussion of politics and economy. Your focus should be on how these concepts support Sartre’s points in his essay “Existentialism.” ? Remember, you must cite from Sartre’s “Existentialism” essay Biographies of the Free and Determined For this topic, find an example of a person making a critical decision. This must be a real person and the event/decision must be documented (because you will need to cite this information). You will need to do some biographical research on this person and the event. Make a strong case that when making this decision or act, this person’s decision was necessarily caused. Then make a strong case that when making this decision or act, this person’s decision was NOT necessarily caused (remember the strict philosophical definition of necessary—“could not be otherwise”). Finally, decide which side makes a better argument and why. **I highly recommend you clearing the person and incident with me before starting this paper. I will be evaluating your information critically. ? Remember, you must cite from our textbook Essay Format: • Minimum of 3 full pages (about 1000 words). You may always write more, but not less. Papers that do not meet minimum page requirements will suffer point deductions. • Your work must be double spaced. • You must draw information from the textbook or designated articles and it must be cited in your work. If you do not include meaningful quotes from the text, you cannot receive a passing grade. Aim for about 2 quotes per paragraph, excluding the final paragraph. • Please use MLA citation (there are very helpful MLA links on the BC Library webpage and Canvas) • If any of these requirements are unmet, you will be deducted points. Key Elements to Remember: • Organization, spelling, and grammar are essential; no matter how great your argument is, it is not worth much if no one can follow it (hint: use transitions for organization and read your paper aloud to yourself to check for grammar and spelling errors) • Specific examples always make for a more convincing argument; take time to think of some and incorporate them • Tie up loose ends; don’t leave anything up to your reader to assume or force your reader to make any leaps in your logic. Show how you conclusions should naturally follow from your premises. A note on grading: You will be graded on your argument, organization, and critical thinking. In other words, you must demonstrate that you know and understand this problem, what other people (namely other philosophers) have said about this problem, as well as clearly expressed what you have to say about this problem. A: excellent discussion of terms, several specific examples demonstrate understanding and applicability, original and creative thought B: adequate discussion of terms, many specific examples demonstrate understanding, shows some original thought C: basic discussion of terms, some examples to demonstrate knowledge, little or no original thought D: lacking a basic discussion of terms F: missed the target, does not meet the assignments requirements **A NOTE ON PLAGIARISM** “Plagiarism: a piece of writing that has been copied from someone else and is presented as being your own work; the unauthorized use or close imitation of the language and thoughts of another author and the representation of them as one’s own original work” (from Dictionary.com) Plagiarism is cheating and a serious academic offense. Please don’t do it. Again, the best way for me to know you know and understand this material is if you put it IN YOUR OWN WORDS! Also, the best examples are the ones relevant to you, so make up your own examples to illustrate the material. If you are ever unsure how to quote, cite, or reference outside material, please ask me. Furthermore, cheating is a very serious offense and will not be tolerated. Students who cheat will be penalized accordingly and may be subject to disciplinary action from the Dean of Students. If you plagiarize this assignment, you will receive a zero and will not be allowed to redo it. Again, if you are unsure, check with me first.

Read more

[ORDER SOLUTION] Water Scarcity

how to solve Water scarcity

Read more

[ORDER SOLUTION] Cover Letter

The Cover Letter presents a formal argument about your growth as a writer in WRIT 110 and the evolution of your draft process. It is not an informal document or reflective journal. It is a polished commentary on your own work. Thus, the Cover Letter should include a clear thesis about your growth as a writer, how your writing process has evolved, and why you deserve a good grade.  Remember: All successful cover letters make an argument—that you’re the best candidate for a job, that you have a unique skill set, that you’ll make a great member of a team, etc. Limit yourself to 2-3 full pages (single-spaced) in business letter format. The Cover Letter serves three very substantial purposes: It allows you to present your writing process. In the letter, you examine and comment on your writing process. In a very specific way, you reflect on the issues you have confronted as a writer. This may include issues such as the nature of drafting, making global revisions, creating an argument, developing a thesis, making sentence-level revisions, etc. This is a very specific examination of your own thinking, writing, and revising. Look to your peer review notes on your drafts—What did you do? What did you struggle with? And how have you progressed as a writer? What kind of process did you implement in creating your polished papers over the last fifteen weeks? How has your writing process changed? What do you still need to do to make your process more effective? It allows you to rhetorically preface your own work. This is the first document that I read in your portfolio. Use the cover letter to showcase your progress. Illustrate what you’ve learned about your own writing process, about how you use rhetoric and language as you write, and about reading critically. Examine your own evolution as a thinker—using your own work as evidence. If you suggest, for example, that you’ve come to make a distinction between revision and editing, you must explain what that distinction is and how, specifically, it is obvious in your work. You must support your claims about your process with evidence from your own portfolio (quotes from your essays, comments from peer review, notes from draft responses, conversations during conferences, etc.). Additionally, plan to incorporate at least 2 outside sources from earlier in the semester related to the creative process and the writing process.  Arguments referring to specific documents, decisions, and evidence are persuasive. General statements have no persuasive power. Keep in mind, your goal is to convince me you have achieved the Course Objectives stated in the syllabus. It allows you to identify problems in drafts and discuss changes you would have liked to make if you had the time. This shows me you are aware of any weaknesses of a draft. Consider adding a paragraph that includes detailed changes you would have made to each draft if you had more time. Preparing for the Cover Letter Here are some reflection questions to help you begin drafting your letter: What is the most difficult part of writing many drafts? How did the difficulty change? What kind of solutions did I develop to combat this difficulty? What worked? What failed? What makes a draft “successful” or “unsuccessful”? What is it like to read a “successful” draft? How does that reading experience influence my life as a writer? Do I examine my drafts or rely on my feelings following the completion of a draft? Do I return to the draft, re-read, and then draft a note? Has that author’s note process changed? What am I most concerned about when revising? Global revision? If so—which issues seem central and reoccurring in the revision process? What am I most concerned about when editing? Sentence-level revision? If so—which issues seem central and reoccurring in the revision process?   How do I receive and sort through the reactions of my workshop group? How do I make revision decisions given several different pieces of advice? Specifically, how did my polished papers move from the first 3-page draft to the draft it is now? What issues did I readdress? How would I categorize that experience? What did I “learn” from that process? Format An example of how to format your cover letter is attached. When you download the example, make sure to view the comments to see extra notes regarding formatting advice. Assignment Guidelines 12 pt. TNR or Calibri font, 1-inch margins, single-spaced, business cover letter formatting according to the example linked above. Develop your draft in a single Google doc. Include at least 2 outside sources from earlier in the semester related to the creative process and the writing process.  Utilize past drafts and assignments as examples of your growth/evolution as a writer. The due dates for your cover letter are as follows: 12/3 – Rough Draft (at least 1.5+ full pages, single-spaced) Finals Week – Final Draft (at least 2+ full pages, single-spaced) in your final portfolio

Read more

[ORDER SOLUTION] Short Poems

College MLA format  My name is Christian Brathwaite  and the subject is English 102. Make sure you discuss how feminism(women) relates to society in those short poems and comparing and contrasting the poems, especially from a women’s prospective in the late 1890s.

Read more

[ORDER SOLUTION] Personal Responsibility

Just in case this is helpful I’m a 20 year old female international student studying in the United states looking forward to transfer in Fall 2021 to LMU and I’m from Kuwait City . The question that we should write the admission assay is written on the order title but I will write it again it’s ( what role do you believe institutions like LMU should play in addressing climate change?. What is your personal responsibility to respond to climate change ?) . Please create ur own title and this is admission essay should answer this questions and display  critical and creative thinking .

Read more

[ORDER SOLUTION] Development Strategies

Use various development strategies (such as compare contrast, definition, cause-effect, etc.). Pay attention to format and style.  Include a well-developed introductory paragraph with a clearly-worded thesis. Your thesis should be arguable; that is, you are not just explaining or describing your topic, but making a claim (of value, of policy) about it. Use the comments I gave you in the P&B to help focus your thesis.  Each body paragraph should begin with a topic sentence. All of the ideas developed in the paragraph should support the main idea of the topic sentence. Bring in evidence and support. Include examples. Refer to ideas in your secondary sources. Develop all of the body paragraphs. Do not write only two sentences for a paragraph! Write an effective and developed concluding paragraph.  Write a variety of sentence types. Edit sentence structures for grammatical accuracy. Use correct punctuation and capitalization.  Edit diction. Edit out informal word choices. Edit out second person ‘you.’ Do not overuse third person (we, our); if used, be sure you have a referent for it. Include at least one counter argument or arguments. Respond to it.  Use signal phrases, signal statements, and paraphrasing to include ideas from secondary sources. Integrate and synthesize secondary sources. he Research Essay assignment tests your rhetorical skills. Both the content (the ideas that you will argue and evidence and support that you use) and form (how you will present your ideas structurally, organizationally, and grammatically) should make an effective and readable argument. Support your claim with credible evidence, critically-informed interpretations, and valid analyses. Persuade the reader to your stance through rhetorical appeals of logos, pathos, and/or ethos. Make your paper interesting to read by writing in a style that is not banal. Do not generalize or use general terms. Bring in specific examples and word choices.   Edit out informal tone.  To move into interpretation and critical analysis, ask yourself how, why, and so, what questions. For example, why is this important to know? What is the significance of this? Is the effect beneficial or something to be avoided? Why does it matter? How does this affect people, specific groups, communities, society, the environment, etc.? How does it shape (viewers, youth, subjects, people, etc.)? What are the ramifications (socially, psychically, geographically, culturally, economically, etc.)?

Read more

[ORDER SOLUTION] Digital Distributism

The final exam consists of these 2 essay questions.  Write at least four pages (minimum), double-spaced, in response to each one of these two essay questions:   Part 1 — ESSAY QUESTION #1: Read the Introduction and Chapter One of Charles Camosy’s Resisting Throwaway Culture at and then write an essay that (1) explains the seven principles of Camosy’s “Consistent Life Ethic” (CLE), and then applies those seven principles to the contemporary ethical issues of (2) ecology and (3) caring for non-human animals. (For details, see also Camosy, Resisting Throwaway Culture, Chapter Seven.) Part 2 — ESSAY QUESTION #2: Explain and discuss the ethical merit of the seven ways of doughnut economics in order to answer the following three questions:  (1) How far does doughnut economics fit with the ethic of Rushkoff’s digital distributism?   (2) Is the Fairphone business model a good ethical example to illustrate doughnut economics? < Loade (3) How is the concept of degrowth related to doughnut economics and digital distributism? 

Read more

[ORDER SOLUTION] Argumentative Thesis

Argumentative Research Paper Essay at a Glance                                                                                                                 To better understand an issue, we are examining how other authors contextualize it. The implied and stated meanings of primary sources help us flesh out and shape a piece of writing so that it moves from a tale of (our own) private interest to one with meaning for the disinterested reader (our audience).  Main Goals for Essay 4 _________________________________________________ Practice close reading and analysis of primary sources to find meaning Develop an original argumentative thesis that requires integration of primary sources in the essay Write an argumentative essay with the integration of primary sources through direct quotes or paraphrases Argumentative Research Essay Prompt (a) Identify a success method or strategy to succeed in life and discuss three reasons or three ways by which this method or strategy is effective, in your opinion. (b) Identify three success methods or strategies to succeed in life and discuss reasons or ways by which each method/strategy is effective in three body paragraphs (one method/strategy per body paragraph).   Write a well-organized, five-paragraph essay of at least three to four pages (750-1,000 words). Use evidence from your sources to support your arguments by either direct quotes or paraphrasing in your own words. You must use a minimum of two direct quotes and/or paraphrases from your sources to support the main idea of each body paragraph in your essay. To be clear, that is two quotes or paraphrases per body paragraph. Six total for the essay. Don’t rely on the quotes to explain themselves.  Lead your reader into the quote, comment on the quote, and show how the quote supports your main idea.    REQUIREMENTS MLA Format Include a relevant title that captures your reader’s attention (“Argumentative Research Paper” is NOT a relevant title) Double-spaced One-inch margins 12 pt font Times New Roman 3-4 pages in length include in-text citations include works cited page (not included in page count)  Attach MS Word documents only NO PDFs. NO MS Word Online documents accepted!

Read more

[ORDER SOLUTION] Library Databases

Your Research Log Using clear sentences, please respond to the following: (Hint: You might want to do this on another document and then paste it into the text box when it is complete and edited.  In one well thought out paragraph please describe your research topic. This should be the same topic you are using in English 001.   Name the SCC Library Databases you used (where did you end up searching?). Why did you choose these particular databases? What search terms did you end up using? Did you need to change or alter your search terms? Provide MLA citations for at least three sources used for your ENGL 001 research paper. 1 – Reading source from ENGL 001 assigned readings 1 – Database source (from an SCC Library Database) to integrate into your conversation. 1 – Credible website source or article Reflect on your research process (at least one well thought out paragraph please).  How did your research process go? Did you need help? Did you ask for help (this is part of the research process!) What did you learn about your own research process and style? What from LR10 have you incorporated into your research process? What do you still need to practice? Going forward to your research paper, what will/did you change and/or add to your search process to find more sources?

Read more
OUR GIFT TO YOU
15% OFF your first order
Use a coupon FIRST15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Claim my 15% OFF Order in Chat

Good News ! We now help with PROCTORED EXAM. Chat with a support agent for more information