English

I need you to write an essay on “Establishing the Facts” on the topic, “Since the fall of the Soviet Union.” Please use other online sources as well. I will add the link for the article from the NY Times paper below, the essay instructions below. Thanks! https://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2016/12/22/since-the-fall-of-the-soviet-union Purpose In order to help us more fully understand the complexity of any given issue, this essay will focus on “stasis theory,” a concept and practice used by orators in ancient Greece. As Andrea Lunsford and her co-authors explain in our textbook, stasis theory “takes you to the heart of the argument” (419) by systematically identifying the overall facts (or the general state) about any interesting and relevant issues of our day. Stasis theory is a powerful method of inquiry because it generates a series of pertinent questions to gain a deeper sense of an issue’s complexity. This sort of analysis also allows you to understand the impasses in an argument–what’s at stake, where decisions need to be made, and how you can enter the conversation.  Task Write a 5-7 page essay in which you perform a systematic analysis of an issue. In this way, you will analyze an argument and find a specific point of contention at which you can enter the conversation. Your paper will consist of TWO SECTIONS that are cohesively connected to each other:  Interrogate a single article that your instructor picked, performing an analysis of the issue presented in the article. Uncover “the facts” of this issue by presenting how the text addresses the following four questions:  What specific facts or data are relevant to the issue? How can the issue be defined? How much does it matter and why? What actions should be taken? From this analysis, identify an impasse–a moment of tension between what the author believes and what you believe. This tension will be an opportunity for you to enter the discussion by making a new claim. On which of the four questions do you disagree with the author? On which point would you want to intervene and offer an alternative view or claim? Locate another credible source then, offer your own position on the issue by making a new claim and supporting it with evidence from the second article.  Assume that the audience of your essay is academic–your peers, your professor, and other college-educated readers. Adjust your tone and stance to effectively engage this audience.

In this reflection response, you’ll reflect on our discussion of Dance Like A Man and how the uses of costume design engage the audience with the conflict in the play. The play is a family drama set in an India long after Independence but feeling the growing impact of globalization. The characters are negotiating the family codes of the past, the present, and trying to create a future. The cultural pressures are both colonial and traditional. The costumes are carefully designed to connect the characters with these social ideas. You can take up this ideas in your paper, or draw your own unique connections to your cultural context.  Preparation Process Think through the following components when watching the assigned clips. This personal research is an important step in formulating your thoughts on the film and its techniques.  Affect: Watch the assigned video clip first and let it just wash over you. How did it make you feel? What images or sounds caught your attention? Do your feelings change part way through? Who are you feeling for? What are you feeling about? Analysis: Watch it again and observe the strategies the artists are using in telling their story. Then watch it again focusing on the week’s particular design or performance element. Identify the specific strategies. Reflection: Think about the strategies of the artists and your emotional response. Do you think you felt what they wanted you to feel? Was there something in your own perspective that resisted what they were doing? Did their strategies make you feel things you didn’t necessarily want to feel? Connection (2 related levels): How does this moment in the play, performance, or film relate to the play, performance, or film, as a whole? What is the play, performance, or film about? How does the play, performance, or film relate to its cultural context and to your cultural context? What dominant ideologies, and cultural narratives are at play? Writing Process Your paper should integrate the results of your personal research process above. It should begin with an articulation of how you responded emotionally to this moment (your experience of the affect). It should then proceed to a close analysis of the strategies at work in this section of the play, performance, or film, that uses the languages of performance of design taught in lectures and modules for that week. The analysis should connect to your des?r?ption of the affect. (NB: you do not have to feel what you think they are trying to make you feel, just note the disconnect and reflect on why.) Then connect that analysis to the play, performance or film, as a whole, and your understanding of its social objectives, its cultural context, and its place within your cultural context.

I need an essay with the prompt… “The lessons we take from obstacles we encounter can be fundamental to later success. Recount a time when you faced a challenge, setback, or failure. How did it affect you, and what did you learn from the experience?” I need it to focus on a issue that is not school or a sports injury.

Read the sections “Preface” and “Imitation” from Nicholas Delbanco’s book Why Writing Matters (2020). Develop an original argument about how Delbanco engages with one or more of the ideas we’ve explored this semester: the role of writing in today’s society, the teaching of writing within universities, the conflict between imitation and originality, etc. Then, write a 1000- to 1200-word essay (approx. 5–6 double-spaced pages) that expresses your argument in clear formal prose. Your essay must include MLA or APA in-text citations and a correctly-formatted Works Cited/References page, and will be graded accordingly. Note that the goal of this assignment is not to evaluate whether the claims of Delbanco’s book are correct, morally “good,” or even technically effective, but rather to identify how they are constructed and to analyze how these characteristics influence a reader’s understanding of the issues under discussion. Each section of your analysis should focus on specific elements of the chapters’ structure (grammar, word choice, sentence and paragraph organization, etc.), their rhetorical techniques, their writerly “voice,” and the audience(s) to which they appeal.You will also locate and cite 1-3 academic secondary sources that will assist you in making your argument. These can include readings from our course syllabus (e.g., Kathleen Fitzpatrick’s Generous Thinking) if relevant to your own claim.

1,500 words  The Hook Everywhere there are obstacles, injustices, issues and inconveniences. Believing in good, trusting, and feeling hopeful are really hard to do.  How can we overcome racism in our society? How can we overcome sexism in our society?  How can we reduce the carbon footprint? How can we stop climate change?  How can we overcome the problem of fake news? How can we protect our democracy and promote peace across the nation? The Writing Task Innovative, audacious people are changing the world for the better as I write this. (Really, I promise you. They are!) It is your job to find out who and how. You must use investigative powers to find one person who is currently working to make the world a better place.  This person must be contemporary, public and research-able. Then, ask why this person. In your essay persuade TED Talks why your hero should be chosen to speak. All sources must be researched.  The research you gather can be shared.  Introduce your your essay by giving a context. Develop an insightful, focused thesis with 3-4 reasons. Acknowledge and respond to naysayers In the body, as you advance the reasoning stated in your thesis, follow PIE for each body paragraph. Use four – eight quotes from the provided sources. Work on introducing sources, summarizing, paraphrasing & quoting, and citing using MLA Style.  “E” in PIE is most important–the “E” in PIE is when you analyze/explain/interpret what a quote means in your own words in relation to your writing purpose–why does it matter, what are the consequences. “What this means is…” is an alright phrase to use. Give yourself ample time revise for clearer content and structure. What is expected:  Show a thoughtful response to the writing topic, by analyzing the source material and creating an organized and well-supported essay. Show the elements of an effective composition with an introduction, thesis, topic sentences, and conclusion. Lastly, please proofread for precise language, following the rules of grammar, punctuation, and usage, and aim for an academic style. To enhance sentence variety and fluency, use appositives, verbal phrases, and transitions to connect ideas.

the topic is health and I chose heart attacks, in this paper I would like for you to go over as much as you can how to prevent them, what causes them, treatment, demographic most at risk and so on. This paper also must be done APA 6 style. The Abstract should be at least 150 words. Also, Your paper should be 8 pages in length. i need to include 5 sources in this paper.

Please use the citations in the annotated bibliography and help me complete the first three full pages of the essay. However, make sure you do include research on the history of your country. This information should be included in the first part of your essay (the first 1-2 pages of your paper). For example, when and why did your selected country become a communist or socialist country?

Human Responsibility Paper Due Monday by 11:59pm Points 100 Submitting a file upload Choose from one of these topics: drug abuse, body image, social media   Human Responsibility Paper (20%) The second half of this course asks you to consider the question: “How are we responsible to others?”  For your final paper, you will reason through a moral problem in which your individual actions and behavior have the potential to make significant differences in our shared social life. For instance, you might consider the following:  “If I overhear racist speech on campus, am I obligated to respond?”  “Do I have an obligation not to purchase products that are produced in unethical ways?”  “Should I modify my behavior to be environmentally friendly, even if it inconveniences me?” “Should I use genetic technologies to enhance the health/well-being of my future children?”    “If steroid use is rampant in my sport, is it cheating for me to use them too?”   Your instructor may, in consultation with the class, limit the number of potential questions to serve as prompts for this assignment. To complete this assignment, you must: Include an introduction that leads the reader to your thesis: a clearly articulated and appropriately focused central argument that demonstrates your own independent thought about the question. Summarize the differing points of view of at least two sources that you have located through the Opposing Viewpoints in Context (Links to an external site.) database, or other relevant library databases, with the goal of identifying points of agreement, conflict, and any insufficiencies in the positions you might note.  Offer a clear definition of relevant terms, focusing explicitly on defining the moral or ethical criteria by which you will evaluate the relevant action, behavior, etc. You might accept a definition from one of the course readings outright, or alternatively modify or expand on it.  Make a persuasive argument about how an individual should behave in your chosen instance based on your established criteria for moral and ethical behavior.   Conclude with a brief restatement of the thesis and lead the reader to further questions.  

In this writing assignment, you will be crafting an essay of Rogerian argument on a topic of your choice. Your topic must present an issue that is a subject of disagreement, that is, it is sufficiently complex for there to be a diversity of viewpoints. Topic: Is it time to shut down zoos You need two professional sources that must support the argument you are making, and successful Rogerian arguments always address the opposing viewpoint as well. Usually at the beginning of the essay.

Purpose: Write a paper using MLA format 8th edition. The paper should be a minimum of 6-8 pages (1500-2000 words). Should ex-felons be allowed to vote when they have finished their prison sentence? Why or why not? Research and support your stance with a minimum of 8 peer-reviewed sources. Summary of requirements:1. 6-8 pages or 1500-2000 words2. 8 minimum sources3. MLA format with complete Works Cited4. Must have clear thesis and paper organization5. 2-3 minimum tutoring sessions at the writing center6. Must have or anticipate one counter argument The course has revolved around the ideas of freedom, mass incarceration, education, and political discourses. For this assignment, reflect on your stance whether felons and ex-felons should have the right to vote. In class, I linked everyone to a website by the National Conference of State Legislatures: (https://www.ncsl.org/research/elections-and-campaigns/felon-voting-rights.aspx). The website describes the differences between states inside of the U.S.A. that allow and do not allow felons to vote, and the website has links to various sources that can help jumpstart your research.