English

Submit a 2-page document in which you highlight the important contributions of the individual you selected. Your document should Outline the individual’s path to working in the social work field. Describe the most important contribution(s) of the individual to the field. Explain how the study of this individual would inform your practice as a social worker. Adhere to APA conventions.  There must be a works cited page. The paper must also include proper citations from sources in APA format.

Develop a two- to three-page APA- formatted paper that responds to the following: Provide a review of the article. Describe the impact of workplace bullying on both the victims and the organization. Reflect on a time when you may have witnessed workplace bullying. Discuss at least two practices of workplace bullying addressed in the article that were applicable to your scenario. Recommend at least two techniques from the article that management should implement to provide a positive impact on workplace bullying. Support your response with additional information from the textbook or additional research. Your paper must be two to three pages (not including title and reference pages) and must be formatted according to APA style as outlined in the approved APA style guide. You must cite two scholarly sources in addition to the textbook. Carefully review the Grading Rubric (Links to an external site.) for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment

Instructions Please, submit your paper according to the following guidelines. 1. Make sure to include the word count at the top of your paper. 2. Please, note that you have to submit a hard copy of your paper on January 3rd, 202. Please print in this format: Times New Roman, 12, double-spaced. 3. Please, implement the use of textual analysis in your essays. Note that using at least 1 or 2 quotes for each paragraph, for a total of at least 4 quotes per page could be ideal. Quotes should not be too long; they should be introduced and contextualized. Add references and pages. 4. Please note that videos and documentaries can be quoted, but do not count as one of the 3 required sources. Thanks. TITLE Please, note that this shall be a theoretical and historical paper, but also a creative one. 1. Human Enhancement: Pros and Cons. Please, locate yourself in the bioethical debate on human enhancement. Are you in favor? Are you against? Are you only supporting some cases, and against other cases? What kind of regulations would you implement? Please, sustain your argument using at least three texts read in class in the first part of the course.

J: Figurative Language 1. Choose one of the three poems from this lesson: “Quinceanera, “Do not go gentle…” “Harlem,” or “Marks” 2. Re-read the poem and consider its use of figurative language, and its theme. What idea or statement is this poem trying to send to its readers? 3. Answer these questions in a one-to-two paragraph response. Write a cohesive paragraph rather than a list. There are no formatting requirements, and since you’re only using one poem, no citation requirements. Do not consult outside sources. Type into the text box, or copy and paste into the text box; do not attach a document.  You are encouraged to quote from the poem (be sure to integrate the quotes into your own sentences), and you can also embed an image if you would like to create or find one that you think reflects the poem’s meaning. The “Insert/Edit Image” button in the menu about (it has a mountain and sun) will enable you to add an image to your entry. Again, don’t attach a separate file.  a. What use of figurative language stands out the most to you in this poem? b. What type of figurative language is it? c. What meaning is conveyed by the figurative language? d. Why do you think the author use figurative language, rather than stating something literally? e. How does this use of figurative language relate to or emphasize the theme of the poem?  Read and consider these poems: from the textbook “The Norton Introduction to Literature SHORTER 13TH EDITION Kelly J. Mays” “Marks by Linda Pastan (871) “Do not go gentle into that good night” by Dylan Thomas (page 955) “Harlem” by Langston Hughes (page 1073)  Poem: Quinceanera This link directs to the poem “Quincenera” by Judith Cofer Ortiz.   Notes: Figurative Language Attached Files:  Notes -Figures of Speech.pdf (1.18 MB)  Notes -Figures of Speech.pptx (623.573 KB) These notes (available as .pdf and as a PowerPoint) discuss why poets use figurative language, what readers should do when they read it in a poem, and the types of figurative language most often used. There are also a number of examples of figurative language here

After watch the movie  , write a speech 300 words :    What advice would you give your high school classmates about ” using  online social media” ?

The paper needs to be written as a research paper outline. The topic is :How Does PTSD Affect Nurses. WRITE IN OUTLINE FORMAT

Part A:  Sonnet 43 by Elizabeth Barret Browning How do I love thee? Let me count the ways. I love thee to the depth and breadth and height My soul can reach, when feeling out of sight For the ends of Being and ideal Grace. I love thee to the level of everyday’s Most quiet need, by sun and candlelight. I love thee freely, as men strive for Right; I love thee purely, as they turn from Praise. I love thee with the passion put to use In my old griefs, and with my childhood’s faith. I love thee with a love I seemed to lose With my lost saints,—I love thee with the breath, Smiles, tears, of all my life!—and, if God choose, I shall but love thee better after death. Write an analysis of the poem with a special emphasis on its historical background and Elizabeth Browning’s life story (a historical or biographical approach). Part B: Write an analysis of the poem from the New Criticism perspective, closely examining the form and content of the text itself without any reference to the historical or biographical context or to your personal response to the poem. Part C: Write about your own personal reaction (emotional response) to the poem. Try to explain how you approached the poem and how your opinion could shape or change its meaning. Part D: In this part of the activity, you will evaluate your three critiques of the poem. You will first need to recall what you learned about intentional and affective fallacies in this unit. W. K. Wimsatt and Monroe Beardsley coined both terms. The term intentional fallacy refers to the idea that an author’s purpose or intention in writing a work of literature has no importance in appreciating or critiquing that work. The term affective fallacy refers to the idea that how a work affects a reader or what emotions it arouses in the reader have no importance in appreciating or critiquing that work. Read this Knowledge Article to learn more about New Criticism and the affective and intentional fallacies. Evaluate your response to part A. Explain the disadvantages of emphasizing background information, such as historical context when critiquing a poem. Be sure to include examples from your analyses. Part E: Now evaluate your response to Part B. List any advantages or disadvantages in using the New Critical approach when evaluating a poem, including examples from your analyses. Part F: Finally, evaluate your analysis of Part C. What are the advantages and disadvantages of emphasizing personal bias and emotion when critiquing a poem? Include examples of your analysis when possible.

Task: Write a 2-4 page typed, double spaced analysis of the argument your work makes about society? Your paper should be a balance of formalist as well as other appropriate critical approaches to support your thesis. Include original ideas about the significance of reading this work in today’s world.

Introduction to Philosophy Final Paper Prompt        Due Monday January 4th by 4:00 PM EST For your final paper, pick one of the following questions related to the different philosophers we have been discussing the past 4 weeks: 1.      Compare Plato’s use of similes to show that there are levels of knowledge with John Stuart Mill’s more “ordinary” argument regarding levels of knowledge in judgments of quality. Which approach seems most compelling, if does? Explain. 2.      Some philosophers doubt that we really do have a clear and distinct (precise) idea of God. Reflect on the idea of God. Is it clear and distinct? Do you have a clear and distinct idea of perfection—in beings or automobiles or marriages or anything? Does Descartes’ argument? 3.      Do you think morality must disappear if everything we do can be explained according to scientific laws and patterns? Could there be another kind of morality based on laws of behavior and biopsychology? Why or why not? What is lost in the purely scientific view of humanity, of personhood? Anything important? Explain. 4.      Do you think that the presence of a perspective makes a neutral stance impossible? What do you think neutral means in this kind of case? Does it mean perspectiveless? If it means something else, what else? Are perspectives the same thing as biases?   Try to develop a strong set of reasons aimed at convincing the reader of your paper (me, the professor) that your view is correct. Make use of the different theories presented by the authors studied over the semester, as well as additional readings on the topic (some of these can be found in the bibliography at the end of the textbook), to support your position.   à Your paper should be at least 4 pages double spaced, in Times New Roman 12 pt. font with 1” margins. Be sure to include an introduction and conclusion that state your thesis (the general claim you are defending in the paper) and that summarize the supporting points you will be making. Please include a works cited page at the end of your paper. Any format for the works cited page is okay if it is consistent throughout your paper.   Also, when in doubt, cite a source! Even if you are not quoting a text directly, be sure to include a note of the author and date for any paraphrasing of statements, or even the mentioning of ideas, that come from another source. Using the ideas or written material from an outside source without citing it constitutes plagiarism and will lead to a failing grade on the assignment. In text citations at the end of any sentence using material from another source are the best way to successfully point out the use of an outside source in the paper. These citations should look like the following (Last Name, year) or, for example, (Fosner, 2018). The full bibliographical information for any outside source should appear on the works cited page at the end of your paper. Please email me if you have questions about citations or what constitutes plagiarism!   This assignment will be graded based on the following four factors:   1. Completeness: Have all parts of the prompt been answered?        2. Accuracy: Have the course texts been accurately represented? Is the discussion of philosophical theories and concepts accurate? 3. Insight: Have novel and interesting points been made? Is your own view clearly expressed? 4. Style: How easy is the paper to read? How clear and concise is the writing?

In a 3 pp. essay, identify and discuss the types of appeal (ethos, logos, and pathos) and at least five other rhetorical techniques that the following author uses in her essay: Judy Brady, “I Want a Wife,” Your overall argument should be about the author’s thesis. The discussion of the three (3) appeals and five (5) additional techniques will support your thesis and show HOW the author makes their argument. Essay Requirements Format 3 pp. of text in APA style Double-spaced 12 point Times New Roman Font Use quotations and citations. Include a title page (separate 1st page) Include a references page (separate 5th page) Follow the APA Cheat Sheet. Content Identify the essay’s subject, tone, purpose, audience, and thesis Discuss the types of appeal: ethos, logos, and pathos Discuss at least five other rhetorical techniques