English

This week’s assignment is a short essay identifying and comparing the air quality between your home, your place of work, and your commute. You will need a minimum of one peer-reviewed or academic quality resource for each category (home, commute, work). You may want to review the air quality standards in your area.How can you find out about the air quality in your place of work? How can you find out about the air quality on your commute and in your home?  For this essay, identify the process you went through to gather the information, then discuss your findings.Finally, can you identify potential interventions to insure better air quality?Your paper should include an introduction, body, closing, and a reference page.************************************************Follow the general formatting requirements for assignments. This assignment should be a minimum of 500 words. It will be graded on content, quality, and quality of editing/structure.Los Angeles area air quality

can you please help me with my essay using this thesis statement? and need 6 sources for work cited should be org or edu.There are many impacts technology has made on education such as enhanced learning, improve student performance, and make it easier with broad access.

You are going to do some research today. It will be a 6 paragraph, possibly dis-jointed ‘essay.’  I would like you to research this question: What causes the 3 sisters to all grow up to be well-known authors?Discuss a bit about the Bronte family dynamic and each sister. The sisters can go in any order in your essay. Here is a basic outline:1.Intro w/ thesis statement. Bring your paper together with one idea or point.2.) Bronte family culture.3.) Charlotte4.) Emily5.) Anne6.) Conclusion, wrapping up your main point about the Bronte family and ‘how/why’ they all might have become such great authors.Be sure to include each sister’s most famous work with a quick summary of the book. Your essay should be 500-700 words long and be written in MLA formatting.**Cite your sources.

Environmental Health RisksA community nurse finds that toxic industrial waste is being dumped illegally into a landfill in a section of town where low-income residents live. Respond to the following questions:As a nurse advocating for this population, what steps should she take once learning about this?How would YOU feel if this was happening in the community where you live?

1. What version of the social contract (i.e., actual, tacit, or hypothetical) in favor of the duty to obey the law (DOL) could the following Calvin & Hobbes comic strip illustrate and why? What objections to such a social contract could the cartoon illustrate and how so?2. What does it mean to have a pro tanto duty to obey the law and why does it make it possible to justify civil disobedience? Would John Rawls consider violent resistance to the law a form of justifiable civil disobedience? Why?3. Answer one, and only one, of the following two questions (A or B but not both)A) What element of the crime of “unauthorized use of property” does the Necessity Defense (as a justification) recognize as missing, actus reus, mens rea, result, or attendant circumstances, and why? What are two Utilitarian arguments in favor of making the Necessity Defense available for unauthorized use of property?B) As the saying goes, “ignorance of the law is no excuse,” which means that a “mistake of law” is typically not available as an excuse defense against a charged crime. In what ways could this rule satisfy the Principle of Utility (i.e., maximize net utility or minimize net disutility)?4. Answer one, and only one, of the following two questions (A or B but not both):A) Explain why retributivist theories of punishment should not be confused with the lex talionis, according to Jeffrey Brand. For Brand, what issues are there with the lex talionis?B) Write a paragraph about any of the topics on my two last PowerPoint lectures (duty to obey the law, civil disobedience, criminal law, defenses, and punishment theories) that is reasonably relevant to your Final Paper. (*Note: If it is indeed reasonably relevant to your Final Paper topic, you may actually make it a part of your submitted Final Paper, as long as you only use class sources in it).

The purpose of the assignment is to marshal what you’ve learned in class, and what you’ve explored in your previous pieces of writing, in order to advance a clear, original argument about the patient-provider relationships in the course reading. Patient-provider relationships are meant in the broadest sense possible, covering person-to-person interactions as well as the medical industry’s relationship to patients, more publicly conceived. In other words, you are invited to write about any aspect of the relationship (its absence or presence, its health, its consequences, its development, challenges or triumphs, and so on) between patients and providers that our course reading frames: politics, patient outcomes, negligence, intimacy, music, race, history, religion, family, friendship, gender, consent, grief, eavesdropping, obligation, sex, etc. Whatever your central concern, your task is to write a well-designed, well-developed, paper that offers close readings of significant moments from your chosen text as evidence to support your reading/argument.There are two specific requirements for this paper:First, this is an argumentative paper, one backed up by evidence from the text; it should also be backed up by at least two secondary sources that are to be cited in your paper. Your secondary sources can come from scholarly books or articles published in peer-reviewed journals, written for either the Sciences or the Humanities. Someone’s personal blog or a student-study site like Gradesaver or Sparknotes do not count as peer-reviewed. Set up a meeting with a librarian (UTM librarians are specialists and are here to support the research of the university—that includes your work), or browse the relevant shelves at the main library; draw on the library’s online database catalog (for example, “Jstor” and “Proquest One Academic”) for relevant sources related to your text and topic. Your goal is to synthesize and organize the information you gather from these sources into your analysis by introducing readers to a scholarly conversation. Citations from all sources should be given parenthetically just after the quote or reference, with a “Works Cited” listed, in MLA style, at the end.Second, at some point, your paper should bring two texts from this class into conversation with one another. While you should focus on one central text (like Frankenstein) in your paper, I am asking you to take the ideas from another text and set them into the conversation. For example, how can you use Skloot’s The Immortal Life or Gawande’s Being Mortal to think through Shelley’s Frankenstein? How can Biss’ On Immunity help us read Woolf’s On Being Ill? The point is to read one text by the light of another. To be clear, this is not a comparative paper, where you say, “Skloot does this, but Sacks does this; however, Sacks does this, and Skloot does that!” Rather, the point is to use one text and its ideas to help produce or frame the reading of another.Requirements:5-7 pages, double spaced, one-inch margins, and carefully, meticulously proofread. 12-pt times new roman font.1-inch margins, 12-point font. Use MLA formatting for your citations.You will be evaluated on the following criteria: relevance to the prompt; argument and thesis, analysis and support (research + close reading), organization and structure, and mechanics.Here are some suggestions: You might take a thematic approach to your paper and discuss a recurring idea that you believe is central. For example, you might trace empathy, or death, vanity, racism, illusion, etc., and how it affects our reading of a particular text / its notion of the relationships between patients and providers. You may choose to concentrate on a specific image or metaphor and trace its development throughout the text. Alternatively, ask yourself what historical events or determinants seem especially crucially represented or grappled with by your primary text? What aspects of this history do you want to investigate? Whatever the case may be, your analysis should be focused enough that what you are demonstrating to your reader is clear: a good indication of this will be whether or not your thesis statement is focused and specific.

In an essay, identify Odysseus’ hamartia. Explore how it relates to a universal theme in The Odyssey. Please use cited evidence to prove our claim

Part One: Identify 5 out of 101.) “Mr. Puppet”2.) Karl Marx3.) Deontology4.) Regulatory Pyramid5.) Parsimony6.) Libertarian7.) Cognitive Neuroscience8.) Desert Theory9.) Culpability10.)SociobiologyPart Two: Discuss Two Of The Following Four Questions 1.) Is crime prevention better achieved through fear or the moral-educative effects of punishment? 2.) What are the pros and cons of restorative justice? 3.) Are moral distinctions based on emotion or reason? 4.) Is there really a choice to be made between retributivism and rehabilitation?

Discussions allow us to explore the week’s content with depth and thoughtful reflection. This week, you read four reflective narratives. Each author told a unique story from their own perspective. These snippets from their lives are often examples that speak to a greater concept or theme they are trying to get the audience (us, the reader) to understand.Initial post: Pick one of the four narratives and answer the following:What is theme of the narrative you’ve chosen? What examples does the author use to show the theme to us as readers?Pick two descriptions, quote them (remember to cite!), and react to them. How did they make you feel? How did they connect you to what the author was telling you?

Your assignment is to think about some of your hopes and dreams for the future and what you can do to help make them come true.Prewriting:  Think about your future and what you would like to happen in the future.  Jot down some notes and ideas as you answer the pre-writing questions.Prompts:  Write an essay of one to two pages (three or more paragraphs) on one or more of the following topics:1. Describe what you have learned about yourself in the last four years and how that learning will influence what you decide to do after high school.2. Describe three options that you have for your first year after high school.3. Choose one option for college or work after high school and describe your plan of action for getting there.4. Discuss how what you have learned in high school will help you to prepare for what you will do after high school, college or work.5. Discuss what things you still need to learn or accomplish in order to meet your goals for after high school.