History

Compare and contrast in three to four paragraphs, contrast two nursing models and theories found in your reading. Discuss how they are similar or different in the way the define/discuss health and wellness, illness, the client, the environment, and nursing. Summarize by selecting the one model or theory that aligns best with your beliefs and then describe how this would affect the way in which you would practice nursing.

Research Plan Preparation WorksheetPrompt: Replace the original questions with a revised version of that question, and one to two sentences explaining how you approached your revisions for that question to give your instructor insight on your revision process. Then, answer the questions about the primary sources below with the relevant information. Research Question 1*Original Question: Did the writer’s of the constitution believe that it should be amended as time and civilization progressed?Revised Question:[Insert one to two sentences explaining how you approached your revisions for the question above.]Research Question 2*Original Question: Should the people oversee their own government?Revised Question:[Insert one to two sentences explaining how you approached your revisions for the question above.]Applying what you have learned about comparing primary sources and analyzing secondary sources, revisit the primary sources you chose, list them below, and describe what each of these sources adds to your understanding of your selected topic. *Original primary source chosen:National Archives and Records Administration (n.d.) Founders online.Meyerson, M.L. (2009) Liberty’s blueprint how Madison and Hamilton wrote the Federation Constitution and made democracy safe for the world.1. Name of primary source:Author:Hyperlink:What this source adds to your understanding of your selected topic:2.  Name of primary source: [Insert text.]Author:Hyperlink:What this source adds to your understanding of your selected topic:

Based on your article assignment on Columbus (see syllabus)found under the course content, please discuss the ways that narratives about early American history that don’t always convey the the broader, more inclusive context that needs to be addressed.Carefully explain what the narratives are and any supporting evidence for these interpretations.What arguments can be made against these particular narratives about American history?In what ways do particular narratives emphasize aspects of American history that fuel particular slanted and/or partisan interests?How do sources contradict thesenarratives and/or provide additional important perspectives?Which of the examples that you have provided do you think is the most problematic and the one that most ignores other important aspects of the full picture? Why?Your paper should be a minimum of 2.5 pages in length and should use appropriate forms of citation. You should have at least one citation for the article that you have chosen to use. The first paper deals with Columbus.  Please note that papers will automatically be evaluated through turnitin.com for plagiarism. Any paper with a similarity rating over 25 percent will receive a zero as per the syllabus policies on academic honesty.

Question: The introduction of the new agricultural tools transformed the economies of the Western European kingdoms in the 11th Century.  This stability ventured beyond the economy to impact politics as well.  Strong, centralized kingdoms rose as a result.  Where did strong and centralized monarchies succeed and where did they fail?  Use the examples of England and the Holy Roman Empire as a case for your comparison.Use your notes in LECTURE 3 ONLY to formulate your response.  Read the question carefully.  The lecture that you will be using to formulate your response has different components.  I am not looking for you to summarize the entire lecture.  Instead, focus on the topic that I have asked you to analyze.   Your response should comprise at least 6 to 8 pages, typed in font 12 and double-spaced. I prefer that you use the contents of the lecture in answering the question.  However, should you use outside sources, YOU MUST CITE YOUR SOURCES.  In the event that you fail to cite your sources, I will consider your work plagiarized.  Plagiarism will lead to a failing grade.

Book need to read: Elaine Weiss, The Woman’s Hour: The Great Fight to Win the VoteInstructions: Please answer  the  prompt  question(s)  in  essay  form. Your paper must contain clear  and concise analysis and beat least three pages in length(no more than five), double-spaced, with one-inch margins and twelve-point font.Prompt Question(due Saturday,March 6,2020): In your paper, discuss how author Elaine Weiss uses the narrative style to the tell the story of the quest for women’s suffrage in the United States. Who does she identify as the primary characters in this historical story? In what ways did inter-movement conflicts, political opportunism, and strong personalities influence the fight for (and eventual passage of) the 19thamendment to the Constitution? Do you feel the author’s narrative style strengthened or hindered the central arguments of the book?

What is the common factor that links together all materialist approaches?-Do you see any differences between the Annales approach (Social History), and the class-based approach of Marxists (Historical Materialists) in how they interpret the historical past?-All historical approaches are a response to earlier approaches, so how did these materialist approaches challenged the political history narrative used by the Empiricists?  Also, what trend from the Empiricists did they continue? (think about dependence on factual material)-What strengths and/or weaknesses do you see in the use of the materialist approach, as you read in the articles by Hobsbawm and Lefebvre? Think about what in History the materialist approaches will illuminate (that is show us) that another approach might miss as well as what do you see as not covered or explained through the use of a materialist interpretive framework.

DETAILED INSTRUCTIONS AND CRITERIA IN THE WORD DOC. FILES.Length: 4-6 pages double spaced, 12-point fontIn this assignment we are going to compare and contrast the views of 2 historians who have tackled the idea of mobilization and civilian experiences in World War Two. This is what we refer to as an historiographical essay.The goal of the assignment is to help you to develop your critical analysis skills and learn how to identify the key approaches, arguments, and ideas in two books that discuss a similar topic, and then link these ideas together to discuss how they provide possible new insights on civilian experiences of World War Two.

PART I : Significance Essay 1: STYLISTIC Analysis (50 points)Write an essay (2 pages in length, double-spaced, 12 pt. font) discussing its STYLISTIC significance. Be sure to cover the following points in your analysis:• Identify the artist, title, period style and medium.• Analyze the stylistic characteristics (light, line, color, scale, medium & subject matter)• Why is the artwork stylistically significant? How does it represent its regional, religious or cultural style?• What stylistic influences can you identify?• Be sure to apply specific art historical terms (vocabulary) in your answer.• Use complete sentences and paragraphs including an introduction and conclusion.The essay must be 2 pages in length, double-spaced, 12 pt. font.PART II: Significance Essay II: Analysis of CULTURAL CONTEXT (50 points)Write an essay?2 pages in length, double-spaced, 12 pt. font) discussing its CULTURAL significance. Be sure to cover the following points in your analysis:• Identify the artist, title, period style and medium.• Discuss the subject matter of the artwork. Does it contain any iconography, symbolism, narrative story or message?• Discuss the cultural (religious, historical, political) context of the artwork.• Why is this artwork culturally significant? What does it tell us about the culture/religion/region that produced it?• Be sure to apply specific art historical terms (vocabulary) in your answer.• Use complete sentences and paragraphs including an introduction and conclusion.The essay must be 2 pages in length, double-spaced, 12 pt. font.Please cite your sources in either endnotes or footnotes, along with a works cited section/formal bibliography in the MLA format style.

You have just been elected to be the next secretary-general of the United Nations, and you have been charged to end the conflict in the Middle East.Which of the items listed below would be the first issue you would resolve so the Middle East might start on the path toward a productive, peaceful future? Why did you choose that issue? Or, is there another issue, not listed, that needs attention before these? Be sure to identify any important significance between the issue and the geographic location in which it stems.? Palestine and Israel? Sunni and Shiite? Oil and the West? The continuing U.S. and Russian competition for influenceKeep in mind that whichever solution you address may have unintended consequences on other situations and relationships in the region. That is, if your solution to one issue makes matters worse elsewhere, it is not a sound solution and will be rejected.

Discuss how or if post-Civil War America was truly a period of reform and justice for marginalized populations or if the population and economic landscapes provided for new forms of social and professional segregation. Use examples to support your answer.