Literature Review

Read the article; Winchester: Winchester.pdf Winchester, Simon. The Map that Changed the World. HarperCollins Publishers. [excerpt Ch 2]   This assignment requires you to work with at least one other student and not more than three other students to discuss the article so that you can better process the information in the article. Discuss with other students (s) the main argument of the article, critically evaluate or analyze it, and develop connections for your writing.  The reflection MUST BE YOUR OWN ORIGINAL WRITING, but you should discuss the concepts, theories, or content of the article with each other. Please have your reflection partners’ names on the following lines indicating that they have worked together with you in preparing for writing your reflection:   _______________________      _______________________     __________________ _______________________   Write a 500-word reflection which will discuss the article.   Write: At least 3 paragraphs   At least one paragraph summarizing the main argument(s) of the reading. At least one paragraph critically evaluating the reading. At least one paragraph explaining how the reading connects to either, another reading/topic, academic subject, pop culture or your own life experience. Include on top of response: NAME and DATE TITLE OF THE READING YOU CHOSE AUTHOR OF THE READING YOU CHOSE 12 POINT FONT

Romeo Juliet: The prologue in Act I has conveyed the basic theme and actions that would unfold before the audience. To what extent are the ideas conveyed in the prologue reiterated in Act 1 scene 1 of the play? A detailed analysis that focuses on the implicit and explicit meaning of why conveying what is reflected in Act 1 scene 1.

Each student is required to read, “Who Moved My Cheese?” and write a 10-page paper that highlights a topic and/or situation related to the book. In addition, students will be required to research the topic and identify scholarly articles related to their selected topic and/or situation. The book project is due in Canvas by 11:59 p.m. on November 19, 2020. The requirements for this assignment are outlined on Pages 2 and 3 of this document. To assist with completing this assignment, please refer to the question examples on Page 4 that are designed to serve as a guide in framing the book project. These questions are examples and you may incorporate other questions that you deem appropriate. below is the link to the book ” who moved my cheese? ” file:///C:/Users/Karim/Downloads/who%20moved%20my%20cheese.pdf

Hello. The Article Review Paper details are as follows: (I will attach the Article)   Write a concise, double-spaced, 2-page article analysis summarizing and reviewing critical components of a peer-reviewed journal article. A summary highlighting and analyzing key points from the article. Do not use any direct quotes from the text of the article.  This is the Article: Article 2: Schreck, K.A., & Williams, K. (2006). Food preferences and factors influencing food selectivity for children with autism spectrum disorders. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 27, 353-363.   Students should organize the paper according to the following topics about the article itself.  Students should perform the following tasks. (See scoring grid for a breakdown of requirements): Summary (30 points) Write a summary (3-4 paragraphs) highlighting key concepts in the article. Please be sure to summarize the study using your own words, and not simply answer these questions pulling words from the way that the authors described it. Do not use any direct quotes from the text of the article. The summary should give the big picture of the article, not the fine details, and should be written in scientific language (third person).  Research question (4 points): What was the intent of the study?   Population: (4 points) Who were the participants? What was the setting?  Research Design: (6 points) Was this a primary or secondary research study?  If a primary study, was it experimental or observational?  Describe the specific design (e.g. randomized control trial, cohort study, case-control study, systematic review, single-subject, etc.)  Results: (4 points) What were the main results of the study?   Reliability and Validity: (4 points) Did this study measure what it set out to measures?  Are the results reproducible (consistent with other studies)? Conclusion:  (8 points) What did the authors conclude?  Did this study add to the literature?  Where could this topic be further developed for future research?  Quality analysis (12 points). In this brief section, you will analyze the quality of the study and information provided.  Describe the strengths of the article (6 points)   What were some strengths of this study that you saw beyond what the authors said? What was new or interesting about the study?  Describe the limitations of the article (6 points)  What were some limitations that you saw beyond what the authors said? What could have been done better? Was there any component that was too difficult or unlikely to be implemented in the natural environment?  Proper citation (7 points)  Use APA format for citation of the article and any additional references in the body of the document and in a references section at the end of the paper.

-Read one chapter that you found engaging & that you would like to dissect. -Write a brief 2-page discussion: :: Write the author’s research topic. :: Discuss, evaluate, and critique the author’s research method. (In other words, how did the author conduc

Prompt: In The Writing of Fiction (1925), novelist Edith Wharton states the following: At every stage in the progress of his tale the novelist must rely on what may be called the illuminating incident to reveal and emphasize the inner meaning of each situation. Illuminating incidents are the magic casements of fiction, its vistas on infinity. Using The Awakening, write a well-organized essay in which you describe an “illuminating” episode or moment and explain how it functions as a “casement,” a window that opens onto the meaning of the work as a whole. Avoid mere plot summary. Advice: Your essay should include a worthy title, a strong introduction that includes the title expressed in italics, the author, and a collegiate thesis. The body paragraphs should have a topic sentence driven by the thesis, at least two correctly cited quotes from the book, and ample analysis of each quote. There should be strong transitions between paragraphs. The concluding paragraph should be all analysis/opinion and should contain a mature insight into how the book reveals something universal about the human condition. The final line of the concluding paragraph should allude to the worthy title in some way. Your essay must have a Works Cited page. Essay due the first day of school along with your fully annotated copy of the book.

Treat this assignment like you would an in-class midterm; that is, arrange a time when you’d have 1-2 hours free and sit down to complete the essay. Make sure you have read the ENTIRE book before completing the midterm. It is an essay, not just a series of answers to the questions below, so please have a quick introduction and use the response section as a conclusion. This is an open book, so you can use any notes you have on the book and the book as well.  Summary / Analysis / Response Midterm – The Little School For the sake of time, skip the summary in this essay and jump right into the analysis, however, leave space for a quick intro that covers the main points of your essay. Analysis Use SOME of the questions below to shape/guide your essay. Text How is the book organized? What is effective or ineffective about the organization of the book? How does the author try to interest the reader? How well does the author explain the main claims? Are these arguments logical? Does the support and evidence seem adequate? Is the support convincing to the reader? Does the evidence actually prove the point the author is trying to make? Author Who is the author? What does she know about this subject? What is the author’s bias? Is the bias openly admitted? Does that make his or her argument more or less believable? Do the author’s knowledge and background make her reliable for this audience? How does the author try to relate to the audience and establish common ground? Is it effective? How does the author interest the audience? Does she make the reader want to know more? Does the author explain enough about the history of this argument? Is anything left out? Reader Who is the reader? How would they react to these arguments? How is this book effective or ineffective for this audience? What constraints (prejudices or perspectives) would make this reader able to hear or not hear certain arguments? What is the exigence (events at this moment in time which affect the need for this conversation) that makes the audience interested in this issue? Response – USE AS CONCLUSION What is your personal reaction to the book? What common ground do you have with the author? How are your experiences the same or different from the author’s and how has your experience influenced your view? What in the book is new to you? Do you know of any information the article left out that is relevant to the topic? What does this book make you think about? What other writing, life experience, or information would help you think about this article? How much of your response is related to your personal experience? How much is related to your own worldview? How is this feeling related to the information you know?

I need proofreading and making my writing clearer and error-free. For proofreading … The turf problem is a widespread problem in football stadiums and to solve this problem to avoid losses, save time, contract or partner with companies specialized in this field, such as Clive Richardson Limited, which is a leading company in building sports stadiums and creating turfs for stadiums and has supervised the maintenance of many stadiums in the capital Russian Moscow in the World Cup 2018. For example, the King Abdullah Sports Stadium in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, the same problem occurred in the Marvel Stadium in the turf of the stadium, which led to the injury of many players, and it became clear that the problem was from the wrong design stage because the implementing company had no experience in Building a lawn pitch flooring. Thus, the stadium management has contracted with Clive Richardson Limited and the issue has already been resolved and they created a distinctive turf floor which is currently considered the best turf floor in the Kingdom stadiums. So In my opinion, specialized companies as very important in solving such problems. I think minimizing events on the field is an inappropriate solution. So will you close the field until the construction of a new lawn? What about scheduled events, how will you deal with them?

All papers should be double-spaced with 1-inch margins, times new roman font (12 points) standard. 8 of the references used must be within the 10-year timeframe (2010-2020). The followings are to be included in the Literature Review: – Description of the publication. – Summary of the publication’s main points. – Discussion of gaps in research. – Evaluation of the publication’s contribution to the topic.

Write a proposal based on the book.