Political science

Here, you put yourself in the shoes of Joseph Stalin, and provide a description and analysis of the national strategy of that time. Your analysis ought to continue the following:- -Identification of the most dangerous internal threat to power of the Russian state. –Identification of the most dangerous external threat to the power of the Russian state. –Policies intended to preserve national cohesion (both “sticks” and “carrots”), including economic and social policy. –Policies aimed at preserving and expanding the country’s international influence.–The role of allies and use of military force in that strategy. –Relative success or failure (in other words, does the leader go down in history as a Great Russian Leader?) and causes—which specific policies proved the weak link? –Last but not least: comparison to contemporary Russia and its own current policy took kit. Have lessons been learned? Are mistakes being repeated?    Research Paper Grading Criteria:Each paper will be evaluated according to the following:–Introduction that establishes what the topic of your paper is, and its importance to understanding international conflict. –A clear hypothesis which explains the argument you are making in the paper.–Extensive empirical evidence backing up your hypothesis. –Supporting your assertions and evidence with bibliography and citations.–Proper grammar, syntax, spelling.Each of these categories will receive a mark of 1 (inadequate), 2 (adequate), or 3 (outstanding). A paper which scores nothing but 1s will receive a comprehensive grade of F (40%), a paper with nothing but 2s will receive a comprehensive grade of C- (70%), and a paper with nothing but 3s will receive a comprehensive grade of A (100%). Course Schedule

THIS MUST BE WRITTEN LIKE A JOURNAL ENTRY/ OR DIARY FORM! Imagine yourself to be living under a communist system in either on of the Soviet states, Cuba, or North Korea. What challenges are you facing? Are there aspects of life that have improved under communism for you? To answer this question, you’ll need to find out some historical facts about what life was like under communism in the country you have chosen.? First, after you have selected a country, choose a leader. What were their policies and how did they impact the people? Are you a believer in the goals of the Communist Party line? Maybe you’re a heroic dissident and rebel with a cause. If so, be sure to explain yourself well and illustrate how you have been able to see through the facade of communism. If you’re resisting communism, why? What are your goals? ENSURE TO INCLUDE NOTS AND A BIBLIOGRAPHY TO SHOW YOUR REFERENCES.

i need the Book summary in the main body, write;  1)What is it about ? 2)What did the author/s find or say ? 3) What is you opinion? Important Note: Your goal is to summarize the content.  You can add your thoughts and opinions. In the opinion section, you can highlight things that you like or do not like and/or add recommendations

write a 4-5 page (minimum!) description and analysis of an artifact of your choosing. If you write only 4 pages, you will not get more than a C. To get an A or B, you must have at least 5 pages of very detailed, exhaustive description and analysis that includes quotes from your artifact for proof.Times New Roman12 point font1 inch marginsWorks cited in APAParenthetical citation4-5 pages MINIMUM, However, for top quality, I would expect longer and more detailed papers.Introduction that captures attention and has thesis statement.UNDERLINE THESIS STATEMENTConclusion summarizes paper and gives a sense of finalityEdited for grammar and spellingEdited for organization and topic sentences (if I read only the topic sentence of each paragraph, I shouldunderstand the whole paper!)Have looked at They Say, I Say for transition wordsSentences have variety, not just all simple sentencesNo contractions!No “you”No “I think” or “I feel”DescriptionAnalysisThe purpose of descriptive analysis is to answer two questions:What is the purpose of this discourse, or what aim or goal does the rhetor (speaker) seem to seek?How does the discourse work to achieve that purpose, or what strategies does the rhetor use to achieve that goal?Your paper should take the following format and have a section for each:-Introduction – in the introduction, you want to introduce the reader to your topic, capture their attention, and state your thesis statement.  HINT: It is hard to begin papers. It is often a good idea to begin with a quote from your artifact, then start the introduction by unpacking the quote or saying “So and so said this in X year  when _ a little bit about context____.” Underline your thesis statement!-Description – In this section you want to write a description of the text.  Remember to study the text closely! Slow down and sit with it a long time, reflecting on it. Look over it MULTIPLE times.What is the goal of the artifact? What is the rhetor trying to do? What is its purpose?What is the context of the artifact? What was going on at the time? Who was in the audience? Look for evidence in the text that helps you understand the audience: what statements does the rhetor make that demonstrate awareness of the audience? How does the discourse select or target an audience? Who is included? Who is alienated? What do the rhetor’s appeals tell you about the audience? How does the discourse empower the audience?Is it similar to other messages of the time? Is it a response to a certain situation? Who is the rhetor? What do we need to know about them to understand this piece?What do you notice immediately? What do you remember about the message? What was surprising? What topics are covered? Whatkinds of questions does it bring up in your mind? You should do research into the context.-Analysis – In this section you want to write an analysis of the text. How does it achieve the purpose that you described?Persona: the role or roles a rhetor takes on for strategic purposes. This creates or contributes to the speaker’s ethos or credibility. For example: the president may enact the role of commander-in-chief, moral/spiritual leader of the nation, prophet, teacher/authority on U.S. history, etc. depending on the circumstance. Ask yourself: how does this discourse create an identity for the speaker? What does this discourse tell me about the character of the speaker?-Tone: the linguistic elements that suggest the rhetor’s attitude toward the audience and subject matter. Tone is found in the stylistic qualities of the discourse. Some words used to describe tone are personal, direct, ironic, satirical, sympathetic, angry, bitter, intense, scholarly, dogmatic, distant, condescending, tough, sweet, realistic, euphemistic, incisive, elegant, etc. Your description of the tone should accurately reflect the language used in the discourse you are studying. Also consider whether the discourse is abstract or concrete, colloquial or technical. Are the sentences long or short? Complex or simple?Structure: the form of the discourse, the method by which it unfolds, and the nature of its movement. Consider whether it seems to be narrative-dramatic, historical-chronological, cause-effect, problem-solution, effect-cause, topical, spatial, or taxonomical. Any combination of these structural elements can be found in a speech. Try outlining the speech in order to better understand its structure.What other devices do you notice in the text? Do not leave anything out! Hyperbole, personification, metaphor, simile, rhyming, alliteration, anaphora, epistrophe, imagery, allusion, etc.-Conclusion – conclusion should summarize the paper and give a sense of finality.You might use the above to start an outline or concept map!Remember: Use your professional voice! Write like it is a research paper for a journal. Avoid using contractions (can’t, won’t, don’t).

Examine the ethnic makeup of the top leadership of America’s major political, economic, educational, and cultural institutions. Are Anglo-Americans still the dominant ethnic group? In what ways has their political, economic, and cultural power been diluted?

“How did the U.S. approach to the world transform after World War II? Compare and contrast the post-World War II approach with that which came before.”Please use specific events from Republican Foreign Policy in the 1920s to the cold war period by 1950s. (Please only write with in the time frame from 1920s to 1950s)

ORIGINAL INSTRUCTIONS: “Your reflection paper should discuss one or two aspects of Peruvian Street Lives: Culture, Power and Economy among Market Women of Cuzco.Your paper should be 2-3 pages (4 max) where you reflect on the points made during the virtual lecture and/or your discussion group. Your paper should be well developed witha solid introduction of your point(s), two to three supporting paragraphs and a strong conclusion. Please be sure to double-space your paper and use 1” margins.Some specific ideas for topics are provided below. These and others can all be found in the study questions included in the folder.What do you think the relationship is between the ‘formal” and “informal” economy in Peru?”Must fit the page limit under times new roman font size 12. Textbook is “Peruvian Street Lives” by Linda J. Seligmann.

Week 5 Module 2 – Discussion: Global HealthWhat are some of the U.S. political issues that impact global health?Identify global health initiatives important for nurses. What specific action can nurses take to becomes advocates for global health policy and advocacy.

250 Words for Each Question The Answer has to be Accuracy, completeness of response, integration of readings, providing specific examples, considering alternative explanations, strong writing, and thorough argumentation. Formal, robust citations following (Author-Date) format is required. Plagiarism will not be tolerated.  Brief Introduction on the first page of each article. Make sure The answer need to combined with the corresponding article in the Upload Files.   1. Is the international system inherently conflictual? How can non-state actors use their power to constrain states?    2. What is sovereignty in the international system? How does the emergence of non-state actors like ngos, cities, business markets, and regional organizations challenge traditional ideas about sovereignty?   3. What is the difference between International Organizations and Non-Governmental International Organizations? Give specific examples.    4. What are the challenges of global governance in the 21st Century? Do international organizations have what it takes to confront these challenges?   5. What non-state actors are most interesting to you personally? Identify one or two types of groups that are interesting to you and form a robust argument for how they influence international politics.

Write a 2 page double spaced essay answer the following questions: Compare the political grievances of the Communist Manifesto with those you find today (on the left or right) ?