Political science

I need to write a research paper if democracy is dying. I would like to include these countries in my essay: Poland, Hungary, Russia, China, the USA, South Africa, and India because in those countries, democracy is in trouble. If you find other countries where democracy causes many issues, you could include them too, but please ask me in advance. The aspects of the question are Voting and the rise of populism. You need to include the extent of people voting and how many people actually voting: for who they are voting for: populist parties or democratic parties, and so on. And why people are not voting or are feeling mistrust or anger towards parties and other indicators of why democracy is in trouble. The US 2020 election should be included in the essay. For example, the president of the US is trying to steal the elections and how turnout matter in decline over time . I do not have many arguments, but if you could find some, that would be great! All arguments need to be persuasive, nuanced, and interesting. You should also include the rise of populism in those given countries and how this cause problems for democracy. There is also evidence on both sides. Democracy is dying, but in other countries, it is also increasing. So at the end of my essay, I would like to have something written like this: “It is complicated there is evidence on both sides, but on balance by my presentation the evidence comes down on the side of …  In the essay, you should analyze all the pieces of evidence you found and then choose which evidence is more persuasive. So the essay needs evidence and arguments on both sides. 

Write a paper on Peace deals between Israel, UAE and Bahrain: Impact on USFP in the Middle East.

Describe the phenomenon of globalization. As China and the United States have become more interconnected in our more globalized world, will this result in more peaceful or more conflictual relations between these two great powers? Explain your answer.

Which system of promoting development works best: the neo-liberal approach used in Latin America, or the “NIC Way” used mostly in Asia? Why?

Finalized research design including: research rationale research question literature review hypothesis, variables, methodology and measurement tools, and the whole research plan.” Plus, of course, the bibliography using a proper reference system.}] Must have all of these steps!   Again, this is a research design: It is more than a mere proposal, but not the full research report yet as you have yet to collect, process, and analyze the data, and discuss the results. It is highly concerning that some of you still talk about a “research paper”. I think that we made the differences between all these terms and the various steps very clear. The finalized research rationale, research question and literature review mentioned above must be edited based on my previous comments and suggestions. I am not accepting any new research question at this time. This is way too late in the term. For the last time: A research question cannot be created out of nowhere. You need to go through the initial research step and through the first scan of the literature. The research question’s specificity and, above all, its relevance must be clearly delineated and explained. I still see way too many papers whose bibliography looks like a random list of names or URL with most of the reference information missing. The issue is the same with in-text references, footnotes, and endnotes. For the last time: As per syllabus and as per our many discussions since the beginning of the term, you must use one proper reference system and stick to it: APA; MLA; or Chicago Style. Any finalized research design that will not have a proper bibliography using a proper reference system will be graded with the letter-grade of “F”. The cheat-sheet of the various items that you will explain and describe in the section Methodology of your research design are to be found here: Research Report Methodology Section ITEMS AG RevMarch2020.docx

Based on the principals of public opinion, via micro societal values, beliefs, and integrity, will the country witness a change in the political landscape of President Joe Biden’s vision after his inauguration ceremony in January that will conflict with his message that got him elected? In other words, will any unfixed challenges from the Trump administration will force the President-elect to be vulnerable to contridict his message to “heal” the politically divided country as intended in his campaign agenda? In providing a well detailed explaination it is important to assess the ideology, attitudes, and political behaviors of his support base. Research is required along with a brief bibliography and citations throughout the body of your work. Chapter 10 in the textbook is a great source to begin with. 1. Cover page 2. Three pages minimum, no more and no less. 3. 3-4 sources in the bibliography (Bibliography must be at the end of the answer)

Instructions You are a lobbyist for an issue that you find important. For example, you would like to see the banning of smoking in federal buildings (Note: This policy has already been enacted.) You are going to make an informational pamphlet to highlight your points to prominent members of Congress. Research members of Congress that you will target in your lobbying. Explain why these members are critical to your goal. Make a plan of action and produce a pamphlet supporting your cause. Who will you be reaching out to? Why? Write a cover letter to a Congressional member and include your reasoning for reaching out to them in particular in the letter. Remember a lobbyist is only as good as the information they provide. A lobbyist who provides incomplete or unreliable information will soon be unemployed, or lose access to officials. Cover letter should: Follow a standard business format Correctly address your Congressperson Use the correct postal address Explain your choice to write to this representative in particular, and provide your pamphlet. For example, maybe your research showed that this representative sponsored legislation on this issue in the past. Pamphlet should: Define the problem. Tells us exactly what the problem is. Detail its urgency and provide data. Be objective. Analyze the problem. Provide relevant data. Tell us how to make sense of the data. Provide any findings Offer a recommendation. Do not generalize. Be specific. Must be persuasive. Cite four scholarly sources Submit your cover letter and pamphlet for grading. Writing Requirements (APA format). Length: Cover letter to Congressman should be only 1 page Pamphlet should be 5 pages in length 1-inch margins 12-point Times New Roman font Reference page (minimum of 4 scholarly sources)

For this discussion topic, I recently came across the Vox article (linked below) by Ian Millhiser entitled, “11 ways to fix America’s fundamentally broken democracy,” that I thought would be a good touch point for this round of our online discussions.  Please read through the recommendations presented by Millhiser.  Once you have done so, pick one or two of the reforms he suggests and critique them for a) their ability to “fix” democracy as he contends, and b) comment on whether you think these reforms’ impacts would move government in a more liberal or conservative direction. Here is the link to the article:  https://www.vox.com/21336225/voting-rights-senate-electoral-college-gerrymandering-supreme-court  (Links to an external site.) For the most part, Milhiser proposes a  set of procedural reforms, implying that democracy is broken because of the procedures that we use.  Ultimately, however, changing the rules can change the substantive outcomes of the democratic process (moving policy away from, or closer to, the will of the people or in one policy direction or another).  One thing to note is that rule changes can help certain groups within a contemporary constellation of interests, but future preferences may change and the rules could move policy away from the very groups’ preferences that felt the rule change would help them at the time.  In short, don’t just think about what groups or interests would be aided now, but also how these rule changes would play out decades from now.

https://youtu.be/ZXCu9XbZTnA  This assignment requires you to watch the video on Food Sovereignty and write a 500 word reflection paper.  In that reflection paper you MUST refer to at least four issues arising from the video.  ONE of those issues should be a reflection as to how the issue of food sovereignty relates to an artistic concept (under the assumption that cooking is an art form). 

Should place, culture, context have any role in thinking about good political order? Engaging Montesquieu, Marx, Rand, Gandhi and/or Parekh (3 of them at least), please offer your answer.  1. Montesquieu, 1, 2 and 3 (all chapters) in The Spirit of Laws, please read also Book 11 – chapters 1-6. 2. Ayn Rand – Objectivist Ethics (The Virtue of Selfishness) and the ideal man 3. THE POVERTY OF INDIAN POLITICAL THEORY, Bhikhu Parekh Please write about 400 words – write to the point, without repeating and lengthy introductions. Formal referencing is not required, but any specific reference or quote should be so indicated. No manner of cheating, plagiarizing and other breach is to be tolerated.