Political science

Guiding question: How does racial capitalism work to obscure cross-racial solidarities? How have cross-racial solidarities formed, in spite of this? What is required for racial solidarities? What have historical forms of cross-racial solidarities looked like? What might cross-racial solidarities look like today? Taking into consideration the readings from Robinson, Liu and Shange, and the Letters for Black Lives Collective, as well as previous weeks’ readings, reflect on this question using 250 words minimum (you may go over!) and produce at least two questions or connections to other readings, personal experiences, contemporary politics, other parts of history, or pieces of pop culture.

In recent years, a number of judges have been accused of being “judicial activists” (p. 281). What is meant by this? Please research this concept and explain why do some criticize the idea of activist judges? Please strive for some significant substance in your answer TEXT BOOK :: American Government and Politics Today: Essentials 2015-2016 Edition By: Barbara A. Bardes

Please write between 50 to 300 words. Question: Explain James Madison’s statement that “ambition must be made to counteract ambition.”

Post an explanation for how you think the cost-benefit analysis in terms of legislators being reelected affected efforts to repeal/replace the ACA. Then, explain how analyses of the voter’s views may affect decisions by legislative leaders in recommending or positioning national policies (e.g., Congress’ decisions impacting Medicare or Medicaid). Remember, the number one job of a legislator is to be re-elected. 

The four principles, especially in the context of bioethics in the United States, has often been critiqued for raising the principle of autonomy to the highest place, such that it trumps all other principles or values. How would you rank the importance of each of the four principles? How do you believe they would be ordered in the context of the Christian biblical narrative? Refer to the topic of study materials in your response. 

Why Study Political Science?. Required Resources Read/review the following resources for this activity: Textbook: Chapter 1,2(Whitman Cobb, W. N. (2020). Political science today (1st ed.). Washington, DC: Sage, CQ Press. Lesson Minimum of 1 scholarly source (in addition to the textbook) Initial Post Instructions Identifies why students should learn about political science. Use evidence (cite sources) to support your response from assigned readings or online lessons, and at least one outside scholarly source. Describe at least one reason why political science is interesting or relevant to you personally. Follow-Up Post Instructions Respond to at least two peers or one peer and the instructor. Further the dialogue by providing more information and clarification. Minimum of 1 scholarly source which can include your textbook or assigned readings or maybe from your additional scholarly research. Writing Requirements Minimum of 3 posts (1 initial & 2 follow-ups) Minimum of 2 sources cited (assigned readings/online lessons and an outside scholarly source) APA format for in-text citations and list of references

What are the differences in Regulatory authorities of US Europe and India?

This assignment was locked on Aug 7 at 5 pm. Upload your homework assignment here:    Reading response based on one of the weekly readings. Should be between 1-2 pages (double spaces, 12pt font, Times New Roman) ~500 words.    Your own thoughts and reflections and not a summary of the readings. Assume that I have already read the reading (I have). I want to know what you think and how you are responding to the readings. Think of this as a thoughtful reflection: Do you agree or disagree with the claims the author is making? Did you learn something new? What part was most valuable to your understanding?    Due by Friday at 5 pm.

Topic/Research Question: The term “nuclear revolution” refers to nuclear weapons as providing states with the ability to protect their sovereignty and independence not via direct defense but rather through deterrence. Instead of defending one’s borders or vital interests with conventional military forces, states could deter enemy attack by threatening to inflict unacceptable damage on an aggressor. As long as they possessed a secure second-strike retaliatory force, in short, they could deter attack by threatening to make an aggressor’s losses outweigh its gains. However, history has shown that countries with nuclear weapons programs still often engage in international competition and conflict. With this in mind, how does a nation’s effectiveness in developing a nuclear weapons program, as well as countries’ nuclear aspirations/restraint, effect nuclear proliferation?  Reports are 5 pages, double spaced 12 point times new roman font with 1″ margins.  The paper should be motivated by a clear research question, have a clear thesis, have consistent citations, and be relatively free of grammatical errors.

how the Charter of Rights and Freedoms helped to shape Canadian public policy in the areas of euthanasia, abortion, and prostitution.