Political science

Choose only 1 question: 1. Explain combat compliance. Use lecture notes as sources. 2. Explain domestic commitment. Use lecture notes as sources. 3. Explain the origins of World War 2. Use lecture notes as sources. Please read the book before starting to write the paper.

students will find a current event related to topics in Texas government: state and local politics. Whats a summary analysis, you say? The granddaddy of all political science, Harold Lasswell, is known for defining Politics. , Ideological values, beliefs, and opinions, aside, when it comes to government and politics, his definition of the word (ironically) is probably the only thing that all mankind can agree on. Lasswell, defines politics, as “who gets what, where, when, and how”. Apply that definition to the article’s information, or the article’s information to that definition, and write a 10 sentence summary that focuses on critically evaluating what is going on, from your personal perspective. Interject your opinion. You should be making a statement, argument, and your opinion about the subject matter should be known. However, this needs to be done in a scholarly and academic manner. Focus on explanation, reason and rationalization, to provide a clear opinion statement and discussion of their personal perspective and political position towards the event or issue in their article. In addition, to receive full credit, students MUST include a direct link to the original article’s text that they are using to complete this assignment. 

Write an essay in response to ONE of the two following questions. Follow all instructions. Make sure that all minimum requirements are met. What should the US do to manage corporate malfeasance and power? Should major corporations be allowed to exist in a democracy?  Minimum requirements Standard MLA format (12 point Times New Roman font, double-spaced, etc.) Works Cited page (does not count toward the minimum requirement) 3 full pages minimum; 4 full pages maximum Use of The Corporation (quoted at least twice) Use of at least 2 other credible sources (each quoted at least once) Attempted use of Aristotle’s arrangement pattern Note: For Option 1, pick ONE thing to argue. For Option 2, have a strong YES or NO; then, proceed to make your case. Keep refutation in mind for both.

–   The book’s name is      Walter J. Nicholls. “The Immigrant Rights Movement: The Battle over National Citizenship.” Stanford University Press, 2019. – Please answer the following question: 1. What is the main research question advanced by Nicholls?  2.

You must answer one question. The exam is worth 40 points. You should turn your answer through canvas. Your answer must use 12 point font and include your name and student ID. Your work must be your own. You must refer to at least 2 articles from the course assignments in your answer. You may refer to more than 2 articles, but you should not refer to any material that was not assigned in the course. These are thought pieces designed to show you understand and can synthesize the material. You should cite the articles within your answer like this: (Smith 2020) and you need not include a reference page so long as the citations are clear which readings you are citing. The answer to the question should be between 2 and 4 pages long. Choose one of these questions to answer:   What are human rights and how can we get states to recognize them? Identify and discuss some of the risks when the international community attempts to improve human rights whether through military intervention or economic sanctions. Agree or disagree with the following statement: “The protection of human rights only occurs with respect to issues everyone already agrees about, so international treaties and other efforts to protect human rights are a waste of time.” Make sure you explain why you agree or disagree.

Please explain and discuss the role of factions in the Federalist Papers by looking at the three Federalist Papers found in the textbook ” Political Theory and Government. Wellington, New Zealand: Humanities Academic Press, 2019. ISBN:  978-0995102385. Be sure to cite the relevant Federalist Papers in the book.  Please cite and quote from the book and not the internet or other sources.  Please be concise.   You need to talk about the three Federalist Papers found in this book when you write your essay.    Please follow the writing instructions in your syllabus. Do not exceed 800 words and do not write less than 450. Submit online.

What is the ideal foreign policy doctrine for the Twenty-First Century? Which problems do you consider priorities, and which values (or combination of values) and approaches inform your doctrine?  -Questions to Consider Before Responding Here are some questions to prime your thinking, and may help you develop your argument:  What do you see as the most critical challenges confronting the US in the 21st Century, and how would you prioritize and respond to them? Why? In responding to these problems, would you pursue a liberal-internationalist policy, a realist policy, or a neo-conservative policy, or something else? Why? Would you work multilaterally or unilaterally? Diplomatically or militarily or via some combination of both? How would you manage economics and trade? Security and security policy?  How central should US economic, military, and cultural power be in maintaining the international system? Why? What similarities and differences between the Bush, Obama, and Trump Doctrines exist? What does the Trump Administration get right and wrong in its approach?  What values should inform US foreign policy, and why? What is (are) the best way(s) for the US to address these problems? Should the US develop an ad hoc foreign policy or articulate a “universal” doctrine or an “organizing principle” in response? Why? Is the US wrong to abdicate its central role in maintaining the core system (Haass, Drezner, etc.), or are US interests best served by pursuing unilateral interests?   Should the US seek an “indispensable,” “money-ball,” or “independent” America strategy (Bremmer)? In addition to the assigned readings and lectures, you may also elect to incorporate contemporary articles drawn from the discussions and the news to support your argument.  -Pre-Submission Checklist for Essay 3 Have you: clearly articulated your thesis (argument) in your introduction addressed each part of the prompt drawn on course material for support, and supplemented with outside materials when necessary formatted your paper using MLA edited your essay for clarity, flow, and tone in standard academic English, avoiding slang and other colloquial speech proofread your paper for writing mechanics (spelling, grammar, etc.) converted your file to “doc” or “docx” or “RTF” or “pdf” as needed

I have to write a 500-word Discussion on The meaning of Political.   What is political? Using the course textbook, the film below, any additional sources, and personal experiences we will work together to construct a definition of the term “political”. We hear the term thrown around all the time, but what does it really mean? Have you ever heard of the phrase “the personal is political”? Let’s take this deep dive together to construct a linguistic foundation for our course.  Chapter 1  https://openstax.org/books/american-government-2e/pages/1-1-what-is-government It will be nice if you can bring up the current problem with the BLM movement, women’s rights. Respond directly to the prompt.  Reference the course textbook in the body of your response.  Provide a minimum of 500 words. The prompt

Pick a breach from the list provided and then explain in a 1,200- to 1,500-word report where the policy failed and/or where management failed to implement the policy. Make sure to address the following: What portion of the policy first allowed the Kill Chain to be effective? How can the implementation of policies be strengthened so a breach is not repeated? Were laws broken when the policy was not followed or even developed? What were the financial costs that occurred for the company? In the Bible, the story of David killing Goliath (1 Samuel 17:4) shows that Goliath has advanced bronze armor, but this armor is futile against a stone and sling. This gives us a lesson that our trust in technology to save us is not always warranted. Examine the application of the Christian worldview within the context of a security breach and how it can be prevented. Data Breaches Yahoo. Date: 2013-14. Adult Friend Finder. Date: October 2016. eBay. Date: May 2014. Equifax. Date: July 29, 2017. … Heartland Payment Systems. Date: March 2008. Target Stores. Date: December 2013. TJX Companies, Inc. Date: December 2006. JP Morgan Chase. Date: July 2014.

1. Does President Clinton appear to assign blame to either the Israeli or Palestinian side for the failure of peace talks? (2-3 sentences) 2. Do we get a sense of how much pressure the US is willing to put on the Israeli and Palestinian sides to reach a peace deal? (3-5 sentences)   3. What kind of importance does Clinton ascribe to the geographic area under discussion? (3-5 sentences) 4. What is this document missing that might help you better understand the issues under discussion? (4-6 sentences) Label answers accordingly