Social science

1.    How are race and gender “done”? [Develop your answer around how race is done through privilege and how gender is done through through the body].2.    What does it mean to borrow privilege? How does one borrow privilege?3.    How does the idea of “doing” limit the way we understand race and gender? What can be done to enrich the notion of “doing”

Analyze the cultural background of Jesus’ encounter with the Samaritanwoman at the well in John 4. Address the significance of Jesus’ interaction with her as a womanand as a Samaritan. Describe how Jesus displayed cultural sensitivity towards her and offerapplication to people from different time periods. Explain how the passage leads one to modelsimilar characteristics of cultural sensitivity towards individuals of different cultural backgrounds.This essay must be 14 – 16 pages in Turabian format with footnotes as well as an annotatedbibliography. The sources must include at least three primary sources and a minimum of eightsecondary sources with an Annotated Bibliography.

Write a four to six page analysis on the role ofwomen during the time of Christ. This Essay must be original and with a works cited page included.

Write an approximately 4-5 page essay discussing your personal views regarding the possibility of outside cultures criticizing Brazil for its environmental policies or Nigeria or Senegal for their cultural practices of female genital mutilation (FGM), in light of the arguments made by relativism, objectivism, and pluralism.Is it possible for us to make valid moral judgments about other cultures?  Or does respect for the world’s diversity require that we refrain from making such claims?  Does that mean we have to live with practices in other cultures that we find morally wrong?  Can we find any legitimate basis for making cross-cultural moral judgments?  Or does the fact that we can’t make cross-cultural moral judgments mean that we also can’t make any judgments about the practices in our own culture?We’re starting out by looking at some articles about the fires in the Amazon and about the topic of female genital mutilation (FGM).  What do you think about these topics?  Can someone who’s not from an Amazonian country tell Brazil to stop destroying the rain forest?  Can someone from a country where FGM is not practiced make a judgment against it?  On the flip side, must we simply tolerate actions that we find harmful to the planet as a whole or which cause such serious harm to women?Be sure to explain the arguments that a cultural relativist, a moral objectivist, and a moral pluralist would make regarding judgments by outside cultures on the practices of Brazil, Nigeria, and Senegal.  You need to demonstrate a strong understanding of each perspective, so carefully explain the key ideas behind each theory.  Be sure to discuss the arguments made by Rovane, Shaw, Harman, and Kekes. Then, explain whether you agree or disagree with each theory.  What about each theory do you find persuasive, and what do you find problematic?  Which view makes the most sense to you, and why?  Feel free to argue for any theory, but be sure to explain each view in detail and accurately.  Imagine that the person reading your paper has never heard of any of these theories before, so strive to explain them as completely and as clearly as possible.You may only use course materials–the reading assignments, PowerPoint presentations, and lectures.  Papers must be in 12-point font and double-spaced.  No title page is needed–just put your name and UC 410 in the top left corner of the first page–and you also do not need a reference or works cited page.  Refer to each author by last name, to make it clear that you are discussing their ideas (cite “PowerPoint” for any general points in a PowerPoint that aren’t specific to one philosopher).  Alternatively, you can use any citation format you prefer (APA, MLA, Chicago). Your grade will be based on the following factors:  (1) Did you correctly explain the main tenets of ethical relativism (including the distinctions between descriptive relativism and cultural relativism); (2) Did you accurately describe the key elements of the philosophical criticisms of ethical relativism (which we have broadly termed moral objectivism); (3) Did you correctly explain the key ideas behind moral pluralism; (4) Did you correctly discuss some criticisms and strengths of relativism, objectivism, and pluralism; and (5) Did you provide strong reasons in support of your own views regarding the approach that you find most persuasive. I use holistic grading, so I assess the paper as a whole, rather than assigning points to specific elements.  However, my primary focus is on how well you demonstrate an understanding of the key ideas of relativism, objectivism, and pluralism.  A paper taking a clear position towards one theory without fully explaining the underlying ideas will receive a lower grade than a paper that demonstrates a clear understanding of the three theories but which fails to explain or justify why one theory is more persuasive. Feel free to take any position regarding the usefulness or validity of any of these ideas.  What I am interested in is not the result you reach, but how you get there–can you offer some good reasons for your position.  A good reason is one that requires a response by someone who disagrees with you but is not rejecting your ideas out of hand–it makes them say, “That’s a good point, but…”Again, remember to imagine that your reader has never heard of these ideas before, so strive to give an explanation of the theories that will teach someone how to understand the competing ideas.  If you do that, you will have shown me that you understand these concepts.  An A paper will demonstrate a full and correct understanding of the ideas, a B paper will not go into as much detail and may have some minor mistakes, and a C paper will just talk about the theories without explaining how they function while also making significant errors.

Upon hearing the stories of sometimes horrific atrocities clients or client families have experienced, you as a social worker may find yourself confronting existential questions such as Why? For example, Why do horrible events happen to good people? Why do people abuse their children?Trying to make sense of such trauma is not easy, and you may seek answers to these existential questions your whole life. And yet, there are opportunities for growth despite trauma for both clients and social workers. This is known as post-traumatic growth, where a renewed sense purpose or a more profound outlook on life is the by-product.In this Discussion, you work to seek meaning from the trauma your clients experience and the subsequent healing you help your clients achieve in yoursocial work practice.To prepare:Read about trauma-informed social work, and read this article listed in the Learning Resources: Vis, J.-A., & Boynton, H. M. (2008). Spirituality and transcendent meaning making: possibilities for enhancing posttraumatic growth. Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work, 27(1/2): 69–86. USE SUBHEADINGS INCORPORATING THE INSTRUCTIONS INTO THE DISCUSSION. ALSO USE IN TEXT CITATIONS. I HAVE ATTACHED THE TIFFANI BRADLEY CASE WHICH IS WHAT IS BEING ASKED WHEN IT SAYS “REFLECT ON AN EXISTENTIAL QUESTION THAT MIGHT ARISE IN WORKING WITH THE CLIENT IN THE CASE STUDY YOU HAVE SELECTED THROUGHOUT THE COURSE”. THE POST DOES NOT HAVE TO BE EXTRA LONG AS YOU SHOULD LEAVE ENOUGH ROOM TO RESPOND TO TWO COLLEAGUES AND MY PROFESSORS QUESTION.In 1 sentence, identify an existential question with which you have grappled in relation to a client who has been traumatized.Reflect on your fieldwork, or perhaps identify an existential question that might arise in working with the client in the case study you have selected throughout the course.In 3 to 4 brief sentences, describe where there is potential for growth for the client as a result of the trauma.In 3 to 4 brief sentences, explain where there is potential for growth for you, the social worker,as a result of listening to the client’s stories and bearing witness to their trauma.Describe any challenges you may experience between the meaningyou hold based on your personal beliefs and working within the client’s potentially different belief framework.You will respond to 2 colleagues/and professor post once I upload their posts.

PRACTICAL THEOLOGY OF CHAPLAINCY: THESIS AND OUTLINE ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONSOVERVIEWThe unique ministerial setting of chaplains requires a clear articulation and regular inspection of your theology. This uniqueness includes a context of people from diverse, ecumenical, and pluralistic backgrounds. It is common to serve among a population of non-Christians. Chaplains must avoid the temptation of sinking to the lowest common denominator of faith/religion/spirituality. Calling, character, competency, care, and conviction are critical elements of your theology and practice of ministry.  This assignment will help you anchor and apply your theology. Perhaps you will review this paper regularly, as you serve in the field of chaplaincy ministry.   INSTRUCTIONSYou will submit the title of the proposed paper along with the thesis statement and outline. The title must directly reflect the foundations of your thesis. The paper must contain an introduction, 5 main body points, and conclusion.For the outline, use the following as a main body point: Theology of Chaplaincy Calling, Theology of Chaplaincy Character, Theology of Chaplaincy Competency, Theology of Chaplaincy Care, and Theology of Chaplaincy Conviction. Each main body point will be:•    Defined from a systematic theological tenet: What systematic theological tenet best defines the main body point?•    Detailed from your denominational/endorser guidelines: How does your denominational/endorser detail the main body point?•    Described through your chaplaincy practice of ministry: How is the main body point practiced in your ministry.The thesis and rough outline must be completed in current Turabian format, with footnotes.Submit the title of the proposed paper along with the thesis statement and outline. The title must directly reflect the foundations of your thesis. The paper must contain an introduction, 5 main body points, and conclusion.Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the TurnItIn plagiarism tool.TEXTBOOKS TO BE USED AND QUOTED (ATLEAST 8 SOURCES IS NEEDED WHICH THE FOUR BELOW must BE INCLUDED among the 8 }

Students of most medical schools in the US, Canada, and the UK take an oath or pledge on graduation which is modeled on or derived from the Hippocratic Oath. This is not common practice in Irish Medical Schools. Discuss briefly what you see to be the advantages and disadvantages of taking such an oath or pledge on graduation. On balance, do you believe Irish medical schools should oblige their graduates to take an oath or pledge on graduation? If so, state briefly what you would include in such a pledge. If not, what alternative mechanisms would you propose to ensure graduates adhere to key ethical principles.Marks will also be awarded for overall presentation, coherence, and evidence of deeper thought/ reading around the topic (up to a maximum of 20 marks).The essay should be not less than 2,000 and not more than 2,500 words. You should cite (in either the Vancouver or Harvard format) at least 10 and not more than 20 references you have read in the course of preparing your essay.Plagiarism will result in an automatic failure of the module with a return of a zero mark for the continuous assessment component. It may also lead to the institution of disciplinary procedures under fitness to practice procedures.

Explain St Anselm’s ontological argument for the existence of God.Explain Gaunilo’s objection to St Anselm’s ontological argument for the existence of God.Evaluate this view: “The Ontological arguments are successful in proving the existence of God.”[All hypothetically worth 25 marks]WJEC EduqasWill upload textbook pages on the subject to help answer these practice exam questions!

Select federal policy from Congress.gov that targets the form of oppression and discrimination with Afro-americans….Competency 5: Engage in Policy Practice.A: Identify social policy at the local, state, and federal level that impacts well-being, service delivery, and access to social service.Related Assignment Criteria:1. Describe the purpose of a currently enacted federal policy that addresses the social justice problem for a chosen population, usingscholarly literature for support.3. Describe how the policy connects to the chosen social justice problem, using scholarly literature for support.4. Describe the historical issues and context that led to the creation of the social problem and policy development, including details about voting outcomes and legislative leaders, using scholarly literature for support.Competency 5: Engage in Policy Practice.B: Assess how social welfare and economic policies impact the delivery of and access to social servicesRelated Assignment Criteria:2. Describe the programs and services provided through the policy, using scholarly literature for support.5. Describe the impact of the historical influences on the implementation of the policy, using scholarly literature for support.To complete this assignment, select a federal policy from Congress.gov that targets the form of oppression and discrimination you described in Unit 2 (for example, the Americans with Disabilities Act, Veterans Millennium Healthcare Act, Affordable Care Act (ACA), Adoption and Safe Families Act, Medicare, Medicaid, Temporary Aid to Needy Families Act, or Social Security Act). Then, complete the following:Describe the policy you have chosen and its connection to the social justice problem that was the focus of the previous assignment. This policy must be enacted—in other words, it must be passedlegislation.Describe the purpose of this policy.Describe the programs and services that are provided through the policy.Connect the policy to the social justice problem you selected by giving a brief description of the problem. Is it a new problem, something that has recently arisen, or an old problem that never got resolved?Describe the historical issues and context that lead to the creation of the social problem and policy development.Include information about the voting outcomes for the policy and the legislative leaders who influenced the policy historically and in the present.Include the impact of these historical features have had on the policy’s implementation.GuidelinesUse scholarly, peer-reviewed literature to support your claims.Additional RequirementsThe assignment you submit is expected to meet the following requirements:

Early Civilizations and Modern Approaches, connect the past to the present by choosing 1 of the early civilizations (early church, Middle Ages, Renaissance, etc.) discussed in Anthony & Benson (chapters 4–9). Choose a minimum of 3 examples of where we see influences from that civilization today. Discuss (in your opinion) what are the positives and potential negatives associated with these influences.TextbookAnthony, M. J., & Benson, W. S. (2011). Exploring the history and philosophy of Christian education: Principles for the 21st century. Eugene: Wipf & Stock.