CU Forensic Evaluation the Assessment of A Defendant Competency Essay

CU Forensic Evaluation the Assessment of A Defendant Competency Essay CU Forensic Evaluation the Assessment of A Defendant Competency Essay ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL NURSING PAPERS Unformatted Attachment Preview PSY8340 U03a1 Supreme Court Decision Paper Please select from the following list of Supreme Court decisions: Competence to Stand Trial o Ake v. Oklahoma, 470 U.S. 68 (1985) o Estelle v. Smith, 451 U.S. 454 (1981) o Cooper v. Oklahoma, 517 U.S. 348 (1996) o Drope v. Missouri, 420 U.S. 162 (1975) o Dusky v. U.S., 362 U.S. 402 (1960) o Jackson v. Indiana, 406 U.S. 715 (1972) o Medina v. California, 505 U.S. 1244 (1992) o Pate v. Robinson, 383 U.S. 375 (1966) o Riggins v. Nevada, 524 U.S. 127 (1992) o Sell v. United States, 539 U.S. 166 (2003) Criminal Responsibility o Ake v. Oklahoma, 470 U.S. 68 (1985) o Clark v. Arizona, 548 U.S. 735 (2006) o Foucha v. Louisiana, 504 U.S. 71 (1992) o Jones v. U.S., 463 U.S. 354 (1983) o Montana v. Egelhoff, 518 U.S. 37 (1996) Death Penalty o Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002) o Barefoot v. Estelle, 463 U.S. 880 (1983) o Eddings v. Oklahoma, 436 U.S. 921 (1978) o Estelle v. Smith, 451 U.S. 454 (1981) o Ford v. Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986) o Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238 (1972) o Hall v. Florida, 472 U.S. (2014) o Lockett v. Ohio, 438 U.S. 586, 604 (1978) o Payne v. Tennessee, 501 U.S. 808 (1991) o Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 (2005) o Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48 (2010) Violence Risk Assessment o Barefoot v. Estelle, 463 U.S. 880 (1983) o Kansas v. Crane, 534 U.S. 407 (2002) o Kansas v. Hendricks, 521 U.S. 346 (1997) Child Custody o Baltimore City Department of Social Services v. Bouknight, 493 U.S. 549 (1990) o DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services, 489 U.S. 189 o Idaho v. Wright, 497 U.S. 805 (1990) o Lassiter v. Department of Social Services, 452 U.S. 18 (1981) o Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1, 87 S.Ct. 1817 (1967) Capella Proprietary and Confidential 1 o o o o Maryland v. Craig, 497 U.S. 836 (1990) Palmore v. Sidoti, 466 U.S. 429 (1984) Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745 (1982) White v. Illinois, 502 U.S. 346 (1992) Child Abuse & Neglect o DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services, 489 U.S. 189 o Kentucky v. Stincer, 482 U.S. 730 (1987) o Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745 (1982) Juvenile Justice o Fare v. Michael C., 442 U.S. 707 (1979) o In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967) o In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358 (1970) o Kent v. United States, 383 U.S. 541 (1966) o Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 (2005) Capella Proprietary and Confidential 2 Running head: FORENSIC EVALUATION Forensic Evaluation Tiffany Hanna November 2020 Forensic Evaluation Introduction 1 FORENSIC EVALUATION 2 Forensic evaluation is an essential aspect of any country’s criminal justice system. For example, when an individual is presented before a judge, the judge may make an order for forensic evaluations to be conducted on the accused person to determine their fitness to stand trial and, at the same time, help to determine criminal responsibility.CU Forensic Evaluation the Assessment of A Defendant Competency Essay In a civil court, during a hearing in guardianship, the court may make an order for an assessment to be done on an individual to determine whether their mental state may allow them to be granted guardianship of a child. Whether it is in a criminal or civil case, a forensic evaluation plays an important role in assisting in the administration of justice. There are different types of evaluations that may be conducted by professionals. The type of assessment to be conducted plays an important role in the determination of the methodology to be applied. The primary purpose of this paper is to provide a forensic evaluation that focuses on four different types of forensic assessment, as well as a methodology that may be used in the forensic evaluation. Types of forensic evaluation There are many types of forensic evaluations that are aimed at achieving varying objectives. The following is an analysis of some types of forensic evaluation; Competency to confess In the United States justice system, the Miranda warning refers to the notification that the police provide to suspects who are already in their custody on their rights to keep quiet (Goldstein et al., 2018). While many accused persons will always take this advice and refuse to give any information to the police, there are instances where some accused persons seek to waive this right and provide information to the police. The competency to confess is a forensic assessment that determines the ability of an individual to waive the Miranda warning. When an individual makes the decision to waive these rights, a court may order for a forensic assessment to be done on the individuals to determine their state of mind and their FORENSIC EVALUATION 3 ability to confess. One of the principles of natural justice is that an individual cannot be compelled to adduce incriminating evidence in court. Thus, when an accused person seeks to waive this right, the court will order for competency to confess evaluation to be conducted on the individual (Walker et al., 2020). In the event where the outcome of the assessment of the outcome suggests that the accused person was not in a state of mind to confess, such a confession will not be admissible in the trial. Sanity at the time of the offense charged A forensic assessment to determine the sanity of an individual at the time the alleged offense was committed is one of the most common forensic assessments conducted in criminal proceedings. In this assessment, psychologists will examine the accused persons to determine whether or not the individual was in the right frame of mind when the alleged offense occurred. CU Forensic Evaluation the Assessment of A Defendant Competency Essay. For example, when an individual is accused of murder, one of the defenses that they may present in court is that they were not in the right frame of mind at the time of the offense. It is only a forensic examination that can give information on whether or not the individual was in the right frame of mind at the time of the incident. Independent medical evaluation (IME) for psychological damages An independent medical evaluation takes place when a healthcare professional who had not previously been involved with a patient’s healthcare is tasked to carry out an independent examination of an individual. In this evaluation, the doctor-patient relationship. In many cases, the assessment seeks to evaluate work-related injuries or any other medical condition where liability is being contested. When this assessment is done, there is usually a claim for compensation or for a party to be held responsible for acts of negligence that caused the medical condition (Byard, 2018). There are many parties that may request an independent medical evaluation. Some of them include an employer, insurer, and a court of law. However, FORENSIC EVALUATION 4 in many cases, an independent medical evaluation is sought when there is a claim of traumatic injury and during litigation. Juvenile court evaluation for amenability to treatment These are forensic evaluations that a court orders for the evaluation of whether or not a child who is before the court is amenable to treatment. In many of these cases, the assessment determines the presence of a mental health disorder in the child that needs to be addressed.CU Forensic Evaluation the Assessment of A Defendant Competency Essay. However, it is critical to note that when carrying out this evaluation, the interest is not only on the present condition but also on the past medications offered to the child and how the child responded to the treatment. Additionally, the evaluation will examine the presence of any factors that may have complicated the past treatment that was offered to the patient. While it may not have been a traditional practice in the juvenile court for children to enter into the insanity defense, this is increasingly becoming a common practice across the world (Chadda, 2013). When an adolescent is presented before a juvenile court to respond to some charges, it is possible that the defense can seek to enter into an insanity defense. This will prompt the court to order for the juvenile court evaluation for amenability to treatment. Selected methodology-Competency to confess As indicated earlier, the Miranda rights refer to the rights of accused persons in the custody of law enforcement to keep quiet and not to give any evidence to the police. The police, upon apprehending suspects, is expected to issue or inform the individuals of these rights. Thus, in many instances, accused persons decide to keep quiet when they are apprehended in the exercise of these rights. However, there are instances where accused persons make decisions to waive these rights. When an accused person suggests that they would want to waive these rights, the courts will decide to order for a forensic evaluation to be done on the accused persons to determine their competency or ability to confess. FORENSIC EVALUATION 5 An assessment to evaluate the competency to confess is often done after the confession has been done. To make this assessment, a comprehensive forensic evaluation must be done. Some of the most critical aspects of this evaluation include an in-depth interrogation of the patient’s medical history, an examination of the person’s mental status, and robust psychological testing to review the individual’s cognitive and emotional functioning. In this methodology, it is essential to note that the focus is on the potential psychological state that may have been displayed at the time of police questioning. It is recorded that “given that the evaluation must be functionally based—that is, clinically relevant data should be integrated with the appropriate legal criteria (i.e., knowing, intelligent, and voluntary), the mental health professional must specifically assess behavior relevant to the legal criteria” (Cases, 2017). References FORENSIC EVALUATION 6 Byard, R. W. (2018). A forensic evaluation of impalement injuries. Medicine, Science and the Law, 58(2), 85-92. Cases, L. (2017). Evaluation of Competencies in the Criminal Justice System. The American Psychiatric Association Publishing Textbook of Forensic Psychiatry, 263. Chadda, R. K. (2013). Forensic evaluations in psychiatry. Indian journal of psychiatry, 55(4), 393. Goldstein, N. E., Haney-Caron, E., Levick, M., & Whiteman, D. (2018). Waving Good-Bye to Waiver: A Developmental Argument Against Youths’ Waiver of Miranda Rights. NYUJ Legis. & Pub. Pol’y, 21, 1. Walker, L. E., Shapiro, D., & Akl, S. (2020). Competency to Stand Trial. In Introduction to Forensic Psychology (pp. 53-67). Springer, Cham. … Purchase answer to see full attachment. CU Forensic Evaluation the Assessment of A Defendant Competency Essay. Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10

Struggling to find relevant content or pressed for time? – Don’t worry, we have a team of professionals to help you on
CU Forensic Evaluation the Assessment of A Defendant Competency Essay
Get a 15% Discount on this Paper
Order Now
Calculate the price
Make an order in advance and get the best price
Pages (550 words)
*Price with a welcome 15% discount applied.
Pro tip: If you want to save more money and pay the lowest price, you need to set a more extended deadline.
We know how difficult it is to be a student these days. That's why our prices are one of the most affordable on the market, and there are no hidden fees.

Instead, we offer bonuses, discounts, and free services to make your experience outstanding.
Sign up, place your order, and leave the rest to our professional paper writers in less than 2 minutes.
step 1
Upload assignment instructions
Fill out the order form and provide paper details. You can even attach screenshots or add additional instructions later. If something is not clear or missing, the writer will contact you for clarification.
Get personalized services with MyCoursebay
One writer for all your papers
You can select one writer for all your papers. This option enhances the consistency in the quality of your assignments. Select your preferred writer from the list of writers who have handledf your previous assignments
Same paper from different writers
Are you ordering the same assignment for a friend? You can get the same paper from different writers. The goal is to produce 100% unique and original papers
Copy of sources used
Our homework writers will provide you with copies of sources used on your request. Just add the option when plaing your order
What our partners say about us
We appreciate every review and are always looking for ways to grow. See what other students think about our do my paper service.
Thank you MyCoursebay team for your support. With your help I got an A for my past courses
Customer 452635, May 7th, 2022
Social Work and Human Services
Excellent work
Customer 452587, September 4th, 2021
Thank you!!!
Customer 452557, June 26th, 2021
Great job on the paper!
Customer 452885, December 14th, 2022
Professions and Applied Sciences
Amazing work!
Customer 452707, May 29th, 2022
Criminal Justice
Looks good! Thank you Jason
Customer 452711, January 25th, 2022
Customer 452813, June 20th, 2022
Customer 452813, June 19th, 2022
Great job! Thank you.
Customer 452707, May 29th, 2022
Customer 452813, July 18th, 2022
Customer 452813, July 5th, 2022
Database design and optimization
thanks for busting this out so expeditiously. I hope that I get a good grade.
Customer 452715, February 19th, 2022
15% OFF your first order
Use a coupon FIRST15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Claim my 15% OFF Order in Chat

Get top-notch homework help now. 20% off first 10 orders!


Thank you for choosing MyCoursebay. Your presence is a motivation to us. All papers are written from scratch. Plagiarism is not tolerated. Order now for a 15% discount

Order Now