DISCUSS: NURSING PRESENTATION GUIDELINES

Want create site? With you can do it easy.

DISCUSS: NURSING PRESENTATION GUIDELINES

DISCUSS: NURSING PRESENTATION GUIDELINES

Struggling to find relevant content or pressed for time? – Don’t worry, we have a team of professionals to help you on
DISCUSS: NURSING PRESENTATION GUIDELINES
Get a 15% Discount on this Paper
Order Now

CLINICAL CASE PRESENTATION GUIDELINES

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is for learners to:

· Have the opportunity to integrate knowledge and skills learned throughout all core courses in the FNP track and previous clinical courses.

· Demonstrate an advancing understanding of the care of women and children.

· Demonstrate the ability to analyze previous patients seen in the clinical setting be able to perform an evidenced-based review of their case, diagnosis, and plan, while guiding and taking feedback from peers regarding the case

· Demonstrate professional communication and leadership, while advancing the education of peers.

Course Outcomes

1. Integrate current evidence based clinical practice guidelines in the care of childbearing and childrearing families.

2. Appropriately apply anticipatory guidance and health promotion in the care of childbearing and childrearing families.

3. Assess growth and developmental milestones in the care of childbearing and childrearing families.

4. Construct an evidence based reproductive health management plan.

5. Identify and address healthcare needs of marginalized childbearing and childrearing families

Requirements

For Week 7 of the course you will be presenting your own case from clinical. The case should be clear, organized, and meet the following guidelines:]

Initial Case Presentation:

The initial presentation should include BOTH the subjective and objective data on the patient organized as you would organize them in a SOAP (CC, HPI – in paragraph format (no OLDCART); ROS, PE findings, and any lab or diagnostic findings for your patient.

**Do not put the diagnosis or plan in initial post.

WEEK 7: The case should be women’s health (meaning a case relating to some aspect of women’s healthcare, unique to women).

WEEK 7 specific guidelines: The case should include some aspect of one the following – contraceptive management, sexuality, sexual health, menses or complaint thereof, pubertal development in a female, a well woman exam, STD, vaginitis, perineal skin changes, breast health or breast complaint, pregnancy, pre-conceptual health, post-partum health/problem, or a complaint thereof, or a disease specific to women or found in greater frequency in women. This might include a disease such as post-partum depression. Please do not use UTI.

Leading the Discussion: Post your subjective, objective, and diagnostic data for your patient by Tuesday at 11:59 PM MT.

Interactive Dialogue: As a student you will also be required to respond to at least two (2) other students initial case presentation. In your responses, you must include the following: Your top three (3) differentials based on the information provided, the primary diagnosis you are leaning toward, how you would treat that diagnosis. Use references to support your response. *DEADLINE – YOUR RESPONSES TO 2 STUDENTS ARE DUE BY FRIDAY AT 11:59 p.m. (MT). **If all students have a response, then choose the student with the least responses to their posting.

Clinical Case Presentation Summary Criteria:

By Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT, post a summary reply to your initial post and respond to any faculty questions to your initial posting or question(s) posed to the general class. Use references to support all of your responses.

Criteria for Summary Post should include all of the following required elements: Summary post written in paragraph(s) type format (No SOAP); discuss primary and any applicable secondary diagnoses along with treatment plan for each diagnosis. Scholarly and evidence based in-text citation support for all of the listed diagnoses; Scholarly and evidence based in-text citation for each treatment plan. Differential diagnoses are eliminated.

*Remember not to use any patient identifiers in your posting (this would be full names or disclosure of clinic name, preceptor name, et cetera). Please include age, gender, and race.

Criterion

Exceptional

Outstanding or highest level of performance

Exceeds

Very good or high level of performance

Meets

Satisfactory level of performance

Needs Improvement

Poor or failing level of performance

Developing

Unsatisfactory level of performance

Total Points Possible = 100

Application of Course Knowledge

30 Points

26 Points

24 Points

12 Points

0 Points

Case presentation contributes unique perspectives/insights applicable to the results from the physical exam and data.

Initial presentation in paragraph format using the following elements:

· chief complaint/concern,

· HPI – narrative/paragraph type format. (No OLDCART)

· ROS –

· PE

· Lab and/or diagnostic data, or statement that data was unavailable at time of visit/follow up

Case presentation contributes unique perspectives or insights, but may lack some applicability to presented case study:

Initial presentation is missing ONE of the following: HPI, CC, ROS, PE, or Lab/diagnostic data

Case presentation contributes unique perspectives or insights, but may lack some applicability to presented case study:

Initial presentation is missing TWO of the following: HPI, CC, ROS, PE, or Lab/diagnostic data

Case presentation contributes unique perspectives or insights, but may lack some applicability to presented case study:

Initial presentation is missing THREE of the following: HPI, CC, ROS, PE, or Lab/diagnostic data

Case presentation offers no insight or application to the case presentation.

Four or more elements of SOAP criteria expectation are missing or not met.

Support from Evidence-Based Practice (EBP)

30 Points

26 Points

24 Points

12 Points

0 Points

Case presentation discussion is supported by evidence from four (4) appropriate sources –One from an EBP Clinical Guidelines and three from Peer Reviewed Journal Articles from Chamberlain Online Library published within the last 5 years.

In-text citations and full references are provided.

Case presentation discussion is supported by three (3) scholarly sources: at least one from an EBP Clinical Guidelines and two from Peer Reviewed Journal Articles from Chamberlain Online Library published within the last 5 years.

In-text citations and full references are provided.

Case presentation discussion is supported by two (2) scholarly sources: at least one from an EBP Clinical Guidelines and one from Peer Reviewed Journal Articles from Chamberlain Online Library published within the last 5 years.

In-text citations and full references are provided.

Case presentation discussion is partially supported with one scholarly source or include citations to non-scholarly/evidence based websites as support.

Reference(s) listed and cited but does not fully support – particularly diagnoses and treatment(s).

References used not published within the last 5 years.

In-text citations and full references are not provided.

Discussion posts contain no evidence-based practice reference or citation from appropriate sources.

*Students should note that fictitious sources, sources that are clearly not read by the student and used, or sources that have incorrect dates will result in an automatic ZERO (0) for this section for the week.

Organization

10 Points

9 Points

8 Points

4 Points

0 Points

Presents case study in a logical, meaningful, and understandable sequence.

Summary post is submitted by due date and includes all of the following required elements: Summary post written in paragraph(s) type format (No SOAP); discuss primary and any secondary diagnoses along with treatment plan for each diagnosis. Scholarly and evidence based in-text citation support for all of the listed diagnoses; Scholarly and evidence based in-text citation for each treatment plan

Presents case study in a logical, meaningful, and understandable sequence. However, summary post is missing one (1) of the following elements: use of correct format (No SOAP); Discussion of primary diagnosis; Any applicable secondary diagnoses; Scholarly and evidence based in-text citation support for all of the listed diagnoses; Scholarly and evidence based in-text citation for each treatment plan.

Presents case study in a logical, meaningful, and understandable sequence. However, Summary post is missing two (2) of the following elements: use of correct format (No SOAP); discussion of primary and any secondary diagnoses along with treatment plan for each diagnosis. Scholarly and evidence based in-text citation support for all of the listed diagnoses; Scholarly and evidence based in-text citation for each treatment plan

Presents case study in a logical, meaningful, and understandable sequence. However, summary post is missing three (3) of the following elements: use of correct format (No SOAP). Discussion of primary and any secondary diagnoses along with treatment plan for each diagnosis. Scholarly and evidence based in-text citation support for all of the listed diagnoses; Scholarly and evidence based in-text citation for each treatment plan

Case presentation is unclear or not relevant to presenting chief complaint/concern and HPI or summary post is missing four (4) or more of the following elements: use of correct format (No SOAP). Discuss primary and any secondary diagnoses along with treatment plan for each diagnosis. Scholarly and evidence based in-text citation support for all of the listed diagnoses; Scholarly and evidence based in-text citation for each treatment plan.

Interactive Dialogue

26 Points

23 Points

21 Points

10 Points

0 Points

Responds substantively to at least two topic-related post of a peer including evidence from appropriate sources by Friday, 11:59 p.m. MT and responds to faculty questions posted to the student’s initial post and all questions posted in general to the class Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT.

· For each peer response, Includes three appropriate differential diagnoses with rationale and presumed diagnosis with treatment.

· Rationale for each differential diagnosis and treatment plan is supported with in-text citation using scholarly evidence.

Responds to at least two (2) student peers’ initial post but the nature of one or more responses are not substantive or missing evidence from appropriate sources to support responses.

and

Responds to faculty questions posted to the student’s initial post and all questions posted in general to the class by the Sunday deadline.

Responds substantively to one (1) student peer’s initial post with evidence from appropriate sources to support response.

and

Responds to faculty questions posted to the student’s initial post and all questions posted to the class as a whole by the Sunday deadline.

Responds to one (1) student peer’s initial post but the nature of the responses is not substantive or missing evidence from appropriate sources to support response.

and

Does not respond to faculty question(s) posted to the student’s initial post and all questions posted in general to the class by the Sunday deadline.

Does not respond to any topic-related peer post by Friday deadline and does not respond to faculty question(s) posted to the student’s initial post and all questions posted in general to the class by the Sunday deadline.

Grammar, Syntax, APA

4 points

3 points

2 points

1 point

0 points

APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation are accurate, or with zero to one errors.

Two to four errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted.

Five to seven errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted.

Eight to nine errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted.

Post contains ten or greater errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation or repeatedly makes the same errors after faculty feedback.

Participation

Submits initial case presentation by 11:59 p.m. MT on Tuesday; .

0 points deducted

Points deducted for late or missing posts

Submits initial case presentation by 11:59 p.m. MT on Tuesday;

Ten percent (10%) for late initial case presentation discussion post not posted by Tuesday, 11:59pm MT

DISCUSS: NURSING PRESENTATION GUIDELINES

DISCUSS: NURSING PRESENTATION GUIDELINES

DISCUSS: NURSING PRESENTATION GUIDELINES

2700 × 1800

 

Did you find apk for android? You can find new and apps.

Calculate the price
Make an order in advance and get the best price
Pages (550 words)
$0.00
*Price with a welcome 15% discount applied.
Pro tip: If you want to save more money and pay the lowest price, you need to set a more extended deadline.
We know how difficult it is to be a student these days. That's why our prices are one of the most affordable on the market, and there are no hidden fees.

Instead, we offer bonuses, discounts, and free services to make your experience outstanding.
How it works
Receive a 100% original paper that will pass Turnitin from a top essay writing service
step 1
Upload your instructions
Fill out the order form and provide paper details. You can even attach screenshots or add additional instructions later. If something is not clear or missing, the writer will contact you for clarification.
Pro service tips
How to get the most out of your experience with MyCoursebay
One writer throughout the entire course
If you like the writer, you can hire them again. Just copy & paste their ID on the order form ("Preferred Writer's ID" field). This way, your vocabulary will be uniform, and the writer will be aware of your needs.
The same paper from different writers
You can order essay or any other work from two different writers to choose the best one or give another version to a friend. This can be done through the add-on "Same paper from another writer."
Copy of sources used by the writer
Our college essay writers work with ScienceDirect and other databases. They can send you articles or materials used in PDF or through screenshots. Just tick the "Copy of sources" field on the order form.
Testimonials
See why 20k+ students have chosen us as their sole writing assistance provider
Check out the latest reviews and opinions submitted by real customers worldwide and make an informed decision.
Medicine
This has everything that was in the rubric. Thank you!
Customer 452707, May 29th, 2022
Other
GREAT
Customer 452813, June 25th, 2022
Literature
Thank you , this is perfect !
Customer 452795, May 15th, 2022
Nursing
Perfectly done!
Customer 452707, July 18th, 2022
English 101
Although a little late, the content and structure of the paper was great! I would definitely use this writer again!
Customer 452561, July 12th, 2021
Other
GREAT
Customer 452813, June 25th, 2022
public speaking
The work was excelent and very professional.
Customer 452653, November 1st, 2021
Other
AWESOME
Customer 452813, June 25th, 2022
Human Resources Management (HRM)
Thanks for the paper. Hopefully this one will receive higher than a C and has followed all guidelines.
Customer 452701, November 16th, 2022
Social Work and Human Services
Great Work!
Customer 452587, October 13th, 2021
Nursing
Paid for the paper to be completed 5 days prior than the day I received the paper.
Customer 452693, July 13th, 2022
Nursing
Thank you for helping with my assignment.
Customer 452707, July 8th, 2022
11,595
Customer reviews in total
96%
Current satisfaction rate
3 pages
Average paper length
37%
Customers referred by a friend
OUR GIFT TO YOU
15% OFF your first order
Use a coupon FIRST15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Claim my 15% OFF Order in Chat

Get your perfect essay with a 15% discount. Use DC15

NEW

Thank you for choosing MyCoursebay. Your presence is a motivation to us. All papers are written from scratch. Plagiarism is not tolerated. Order now for a 15% discount

Order Now