Discussion: Eradicating Medication Errors within EHR

Discussion: Eradicating Medication Errors within EHR ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS ON Discussion: Eradicating Medication Errors within EHR A 20 page plus research paper. i will provide the reference to be used in this paper as well as an example of how this paper should be. Discussion: Eradicating Medication Errors within EHR david_marc__example_research_proposal.docx research_protocol_1__2.docx Proposal Guidelines These guidelines are based on the WHO recommendations. The proposal should be approximately 7-20 pages in length and include all of the sections below. The paper should be in Times New Roman, 12-point font, 1-inch margins, and double-spaced. For citations and references, please use APA style formatting. The research proposal will consist of the following sections: Title Page The project title should be descriptive and concise. It may need to be revised after completion of the writing of the protocol to reflect more closely the sense of the study. Project Summary (1-3 pages) The summary should be concise, and should summarize all the elements of the protocol. It should stand on its own, and not refer the reader to points in the project description. It is similar to an abstract in a research manuscript or an executive summary in a business report. Project Description Rationale (10-20 pages) This is related to the introduction and literature review in a research paper. It puts the proposal in context. It should answer the question of why and what: why the research needs to be done and what will be its relevance. A description of the most relevant studies published on the subject should be provided to support the rationale for the study. Research Questions & Hypotheses (1 page) Specify the primary research question. The research question should be simple (not complex), specific (not vague), and stated in advance (not after the research is done). After statement of the primary research question, secondary questions may be stated. Young investigators are advised to resist the temptation to put too many objectives or over-ambitious objectives that cannot be adequately achieved by the implementation of the protocol. After each research question, a hypothesis should be provided. The hypothesis should be written as a statement that predicts the relationship of the variables. For guidance on developing research questions and hypotheses, read the following: http://www.elsevierhealth.com/media/us/samplechapters/9780323057431/Chapter%2002.pdf Methodology The methodology section has to be thought out carefully and written in full detail. It is the most important part of the protocol. It should include information on the research design, the research subjects, interventions introduced, observations to be made and sample size. Research design (1-2 paragraphs) The choice of the design should be explained in relation to the study objectives. Research subjects (1 page) Depending on the type of the study, the following questions should be answered: What are the criteria for inclusion or selection? What are the criteria for exclusion? In intervention studies, how will subjects be allocated to index and comparison groups? What are the criteria for discontinuation? Interventions and/or Observations (1-3 pages) Intervention : if an intervention is introduced (e.g., mobile device, training program, decision support tools), a description must be given, and whether they are already commercially available, or in phases of experimentation. For technology that is commercially available, the protocol must state their proprietary names and manufacturer. For interventions that are still in the experimental stage (or that are commercially available but are being used for a different indication), additional information should be provided on available pre-clinical investigations. Observations : Information should be provided on the observations to be made, how they will be made, and how frequently will they be made. If the observation is made by a questionnaire, this should be appended to the protocol. Sample size (1 page) The protocol should provide information and justification about sample size. A larger sample size than needed to test the research hypothesis increases the cost and duration of the study and will be unethical if it exposes human subjects to any potential unnecessary risk without additional benefit. A smaller sample size than needed can also be unethical if it exposes human subjects to risk with no benefit to scientific knowledge. The basis on which sample size is calculated should be explained in the methodology section of the protocol. Calculation of sample size has been made easy by computer software programs, but the principles underlying the estimation should be well understood. Data management and analysis (1-2 pages) The protocol should provide information on how the data will be managed, including data coding for computer analysis, monitoring and verification. Information should also be provided on the available computer facility. The statistical methods used for the analysis of data should be clearly outlined. Ethical considerations (1 page) All research protocols in the biomedical field (including health information and health informatics research) particularly if it involves human subjects, must include a section addressing ethical considerations. This includes two components: The first is a written approval of the appropriate ethics review committee, together with a written form for informed consent, where appropriate. The second is a special section, preferably in the format of a checklist (see bulleted points below), to address all possible ethical concerns. Simply getting the ethical approval is not enough. Is the research design adequate to provide answers to the research question? It is ?unethical to expose subjects to research that will have no value. Is the method of selection of research subjects justified? The use of vulnerable subjects as research participants needs special justification. Vulnerable subjects include those in prison, minors and persons with mental disability. Particularly in international research, it is important to ensure that the population in which the study is conducted will benefit from any potential outcome of the research. They should not be doing it to the benefit of another population. Justification is needed for any inducement, financial or otherwise, for participants to be enrolled in the study. Are interventions justified, in terms of risks/benefits ratio? Risks are not limited to physical harm. Psychological and social risks must also be considered. For observations made, have measures been taken to ensure confidentiality? References The protocol should end with relevant references on the subject in APA style. Discussion: Eradicating Medication Errors within EHR Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10