Discussion: Impact of Aquifer Case Study

Discussion: Impact of Aquifer Case Study
Discussion: Impact of Aquifer Case Study
Aquifer Case Study
For this assignment, you will complete a Aquifer case study based on the course objectives and weekly content. Aquifer cases emphasize core learning objectives for an evidence-based primary care curriculum. Throughout your nurse practitioner program, you will use the Aquifer case studies to promote the development of clinical reasoning through the use of ongoing assessment and diagnostic skills and to develop patient care plans that are grounded in the latest clinical guidelines and evidence-based practice.
After you complete the Aquifer case study for the week, please print out the summary of your case session and submit as a PDF file to the Submissions Area. Note that the summary of your case session has your name in the top-right corner. You need to submit this document as evidence that you have completed the case.
The Aquifer assignments are highly interactive and a dynamic way to enhance your learning. Material from the Aquifer cases will be present in the weekly quizzes, the midterm exam, and the final exam. You must have all Aquifer assignments completed in order to successfully pass the course.
Use this link for information on how to access and navigate Aquifer.
This week, complete the case entitled “Case #26: 55-year-old male with fatigue – Mr. Cunha.”
Submission Details:
Name your document SU_NSG6440_W6_Project1_LastName_FirstInitial.pdf.
Submit your document to the Submissions Area by the due date assigned.
Abstract
The Chalk aquifer of the English South Downs is very heavily utilised. The groundwater resources have enjoyed a formal programme of management which started in the 1950s, although a number of actions had been taken earlier in order to deal with saline intrusion and potential risk to groundwater quality from urbanisation. In the late 1950s the policy of ‘leakage/storage’ boreholes was first adopted, whereby the ‘leakage’ boreholes along the coast were pumped in winter to intercept fresh water discharge to the sea and to maximise the recharge potential inland, and inland ‘storage’ boreholes were used, as much as possible, in the summer months only. A comprehensive monitoring programme supported by aquifer modelling has enabled a gradual increase in overall abstraction to take place without increasing groundwater degradation due to saline intrusion. There have been various pollution prevention strategies over the years, and these have been effective in protecting the groundwater despite the high population density and widespread agricultural activity within the South Downs. The management of the aquifer has clearly been successful; there are many lessons from this experience that can be applied to other regions and other aquifers.
groundwater management monitoring pollution prevention saline intrusion
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Headworth, H. G. and Fox, G. B.: 1986, The South Downs Chalk aquifer: its development and management, J. Inst. Water Engineers Scientists 40, 345–361.Google Scholar
Headworth, H. G.: 1994, The groundwater schemes of Southern Water 1970–90, recollections of a golden age, Technical Report, Southern Water Group.Google Scholar
Jones H. K. and Robins N. S. (eds): 1998, The South Downs Aquifer. National Groundwater Survey, Report British Geological Survey.Google Scholar
Miles, R.: 1993, Maintaining groundwater supplies during drought conditions in the Brighton area, J. Inst. Water Environ. Manage. 7, 382–386.Google Scholar
NRA: 1990, Groundwater Vulnerability Map of Sussex, 1: 100 000, National Rivers Authority, Worthing.Google Scholar
NRA: 1992, Policy and practice for the protection of groundwater, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Nutbrown, D. A.: 1976, A model study of the effects of artificial recharge, J. Hydrology 31, 1–2, 57–65.Google Scholar
Price, M., Bird, M. J. and Foster, S. S. D.: 1976, Chalk pore size measurements and their significance, Water Services (October) 596–600.Google Scholar
Southern Water Authority: 1984, Aquifer protection policy, Southern Water Authority, Brighton.Google Scholar