Discussion: QUALITY IMPROVEMENT IN HEALTHCARE SERVICES

Discussion: QUALITY IMPROVEMENT IN HEALTHCARE SERVICES ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS ON Discussion: QUALITY IMPROVEMENT IN HEALTHCARE SERVICES PLEASE REVISE PER FEEDBACK , make a few update, just to show something has been done You are off to a good start in analyzing patient safety with falls in Jewish General Hospital. You included relevant and appropriate sources that supported your discussion. Your assessment is a general overview and you do provide significant data that addresses the different severities of falls but you need to be much more specific in addressing all of the criteria for this assessment. See my feedback for Criterion 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 in the scoring guide. Discussion: QUALITY IMPROVEMENT IN HEALTHCARE SERVICES It also would be helpful if you used the criteria as headings. j022__1_.edited__2_.docx Running head: QUALITY IMPROVEMENT IN HEALTHCARE SERVICES Quality Improvement in Healthcare Services Name University Course Date 1 QUALITY IMPROVEMENT IN HEALTHCARE SERVICES 2 Introduction The importance of quality, as well as safety enhancement activities and programs, is permeating the healthcare system (Nelson and Staggers, 2016). There is a continuous effort that is being made by the healthcare experts to improve the quality of care as well safety given to patients. Nelson and Staggers (2016) defined Quality health care as the level at which the services of health for individuals as well as populations raise the possibility of desired health results and remain persistent with the present knowledge of specialists. A study by Institute of medicine indicates that in as much as some of the medical errors are caused by human, but the majority of the mistakes is because of the faulty equipment as well as wrong processes. The tradition of care quality plus safety of the patient is relying on a robust as well as supportive working surrounding that is improving leadership, evidence-based practice, which is interprofessionalism together with effective communication. Health professional is imperative in creating the culture and forthrightly affect results within the organization. Needs and Problems The research study performed by Morse classified in-patients into three categories: (1) accidental fall that arises from external factors like the surrounding conditions. (2) projected fall that because of the internal elements majorly psychological like confusion. (3) Unpredicted falls caused by unanticipated internal factors like the new onset of the syncopal event or significant intrinsic factor, for example, the stroke (Ogrinc et al., 2016). Morse maintains that by use of this classification close to seventy-eight percent of the of the falls associated to projected factors of the psychology can be identified as early as possible, and safety measures can be put into place to prevent fall (Rutter et al., 2016). Research studies to find out the cause of the unanticipated internal factors, for instance, testing for the anticipators of syncopal elements, might raise the QUALITY IMPROVEMENT IN HEALTHCARE SERVICES 3 initial detection of projected falls caused by physiological problems that could eventually reduce the rate of falls. Data Analysis The principal function of nurse leaders is to ensure consistency in the quality that takes place in the nursing as well as clinical agencies. It is discussed in the report by the Jewish General Hospital show the significance of fall in hospitals. Falling is something people have been experiencing since their childhood years.Discussion: QUALITY IMPROVEMENT IN HEALTHCARE SERVICES These falls could result in no injuries or minor injuries that include scrape or bruise or significant injuries that include fractures. However, the older and vulnerable people (patients and small children) are wearier to falls, and the results of falling are unpleasant. Falls is one of the adverse incidents that take place in hospitals. According to McFadden, Stock and Gowen III (2015) majority of falls in patients lead to minor injuries. However, the possibility of severe injuries to occur like broken bones and open wounds are always possible and can have long-term consequences. In cases where physical manifestation of the damage happens, it can lead to internal injuries or psychological torture to a patient and hinder recovery and adversely affect the quality of life (Brownson, Deshpande, and Gillespie, 2017). Figure 1 shows the reported patient falls that are not harming the patient. Source: JGH Quality Program (Risk Management) Figure 2 shows reported patient falls that are causing minor injury QUALITY IMPROVEMENT IN HEALTHCARE SERVICES 4 Source: JGH Quality Program (Risk Management) • E1- Accident took place that perhaps led to temporary consequences to an individual and led to general first aid • E2- Fall occurred that led to non-permanent effects to a patient. This resulted in a patient who was given some specialized treatment. Though it needed no extended hospitalization Figure 3 shows the patient falls that led to significant injuries. Source: JGH Quality Program (Risk Management) • F- Fall place and resulted in the temporary or reversible effect on the victim. The individual was given specialized care that involved the individual being admitted to the hospital that lengthened the hospital stay. • G- Fall took place that led to irreversible effects on the victim • H- Fall took place the needed intervention to sustain life • The fall led to the death However, falls that lead to significant injuries is not universal (Batalden et al., 2015). Although, there are a lot of measures that can be put in place to inhibit falls in hospitals. Some reasons have mentioned the risk factors for falling while in hospital. These are frequent getting out bed and QUALITY IMPROVEMENT IN HEALTHCARE SERVICES 5 taking a walk while in the hospital. Though the medical staff encourages patients always to walk as it leads to the well-being of the patient, nonetheless, this increases the risk of falling. Falls are frequent in aged as well as frail patients (Balasubramanian et al., 2015). Discussion: QUALITY IMPROVEMENT IN HEALTHCARE SERVICES A study performed at Jewish General Hospital showed that indicated that nearly 50 percent were of age 75 and above and were having several medical conditions and thus increased their risk of falling (Prince et al., 2016). It is essential to indicate that the rates of falls at Jewish General Hospital are reducing since the staffs are more acquainted with the fall mitigation strategies of the hospital. Factors behind patient safety Falls, as well as its associated injuries, have repeatedly been linked with the quality of nursing care in the that is acute (Hansson, Höög, and Nyström, 2017).They are part of the nursing-quality indicator investigated by various nursing quality control bodies such as the. These bodies are providing health centers with the capability to perceive their rates of falls as well as injury in accordance to other health facilities centers of same type and size (Brownson, Deshpande, and Gillespie, 2017). In the setting of a nursing home, the long-term care minimum dataset is utilized for giving reports of every aspect of care. The long-term care minimum dataset records the history of fall as well as injury through evaluations that are carried out on admission as well as at regular intervals during stay while in the hospital. Additionally, patients are assessed for balance as well as the capability to carry out duties of day-to-day life with the aim of applying prevention strategies of fall should the patient be having some deficiencies in these areas. Recent study research conducted by Hill Westmoreland together with Gruber-Baldini showed that only seventy-five percent agreement between the least dataset reporting plus chart briefing for a set of long-term care centers (Nelson and Staggers, 2016). Moreover, another study in the in the setting of long-term, the Nursing Home Quality Initiative enhances the gathering of QUALITY IMPROVEMENT IN HEALTHCARE SERVICES 6 a list of promoted indicators of quality which is including those tracking reductions in the cognitive status as well as functional status (McFadden, Stock and Gowen III, 2015). Discussion: QUALITY IMPROVEMENT IN HEALTHCARE SERVICES The Agency for Healthcare Research as well as Quality chose to investigate postoperative hip fracture as their fall linked preventive indicator of quality that is concordance with the thought that looking into fall associated is a very reliable parameter of class (Batalden et al., 2015).Although monitoring every fracture would be beneficial. The Information Set as well as the Health Plan Employer Data lately included the risk of fall between the providers of health insurance. But the use of fall prevention programs as well as injury prevention programs are not part of an indicator, thus making it challengeable to benchmark the significant measures. Surged as well as accurate tracking of these factors has the probability of mitigating falls among the patients in hospitals as well as nursing homes. Although the consequences of these efforts are yet to be established (Rutter et al., 2016). Outline for Quality Improvement Donabedian suggested that the quality of healthcare through observation of its framework, procedures as well as results more than four decades ago. The framework measures evaluate the availability of resources, accessibility of resources as well as quality of resources, for example, health insurance, the capacity of beds in hospitals together with some nurses with more training (McFadden, Stock and Gowen III, 2015). Process parameters evaluate the delivery of healthcare services by clinical officers as well as providers, like the application of guidelines for care of patients having diabetes (Balasubramanian et al., 2015).Outcome parameters demonstrate the last outcome of healthcare and are capable of being influenced by behavioral as well as environmental factors (Batalden et al., 2015). QUALITY IMPROVEMENT IN HEALTHCARE SERVICES 7 Two decades later, quality methods of enhancements have asserted the significance to identify a procedure with less-than-ideal results that measures the significant attributes through application of careful analysis to devise a new approach, consolidating the recreated strategy, with the process and re-evaluation performance to get suppose the change in procedure becomes successful (Rutter et al., 2016).Moreover, more methods have been developed which include the Zero defects, Baldrige as well as International Organization for Standardization (ISO 9000) among others (Batalden et al., 2015). Discussion: QUALITY IMPROVEMENT IN HEALTHCARE SERVICES According to Batalden et al. (2015) quality improvement refers to the systematic, dataguided functions created to bring about instant enhancement in health care delivery in specific settings. However, quality improvement plans involve any intervention that looks forward at mitigating the quality for a group of patients representative of those faced in the everyday practice. Quality improvement activities, as well as plans, are unique in each research. As research is attempting to evaluate as well as address issues that would give overall outcomes, quality enhancement activities include dynamism in interventions, small samples, as well as approval of new methods that seem to be efficient and effective. Reinhardt and Ray proposed the following criteria that differentiate between quality improvement and research (1) hazards to stakeholder is absent in quality improvement while research could be posing risks to stakeholders, (2)data from quality improvement is organization-specific, while research data are obtained from several organizations, (3) quality improvement makes research practical while research is developing contemporary interventions, and (4) the primary audience for quality improvement is the organization, and the data from analyses could be applicable to the specific organization (Ogrinc et al., 2016). Various strategies could be used, and we are going to discuss the following: QUALITY IMPROVEMENT IN HEALTHCARE SERVICES i. 8 The PDSA strategy PDSA is an abbreviation for Plan-DO- Study-Act. This is a strategy which can be used for quality improvements studies as well as activities to make changes in the healthcare system that are favorable. PDSA has been used widely in the healthcare improvement organizations for quick improvement of the cycle. Among the unique characteristics of this feature of PDSA is the cyclical nature of influencing and evaluating change, most efficiently completed via small plus frequent PDSAs instead of huge and sluggish ones before modifications made system-wide. PDSA is useful when a rapid change is needed, similar to the case of Jewish General Hospital (JGH). The primary reason for PDSA quality improvement strategies is to create a functional or causal association between alterations procedures especially behaviors and capabilities plus outcomes. Ogrinc et al. (2016)suggested three questioned that needs attention before using the PDSA cycles: (1) what the objective of the project is? (2) how will it be known if the aim is achieved? (3) what will be done to make the goal? (Batalden et al., 2015). There are four steps to follow to ensure PDSA is completed: i. Plan – This step incorporates forming a team that will be for disciplinary purposes. Whereas nurse leaders noted the issues to be transactional leadership via analysis as well as discussion, the inter-professional group will formalize the primary outcomes by employing the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire survey.Discussion: QUALITY IMPROVEMENT IN HEALTHCARE SERVICES This survey would be dispersed to all nurses together with other healthcare officers. After the analysis of collected data, achievable objectives will be defined ii. Do- The team will build a strategic program, to achieve the goals that have been identified. This will happen with the help of the organization. QUALITY IMPROVEMENT IN HEALTHCARE SERVICES iii. 9 The study – the outcomes from implementation of plans derive from the initial steps are put under analysis. Observations are based on various inter-professional perceptions then set against the performance of JGH fall units iv. Act – The last step of the model, the objectives are put in the first step are re-assessed to find out whether the programs were efficient as well as practical. JGH can perform this step through calculation of data on the risks factors while taking note of increase or decrease in the quality outcomes. Effective Communication Strategies to Promote Quality Improvement Effective communication is crucial to make a change on a large scale. However, strategies of communication are not incorporated into our health quality improvement structures. Practical as well as efficient communications are widely delivered of safe as well as quality patient care. Earlier research studies are showing that quality improvement strategies (whether accidental or deliberate) promote the level of communication within the organization. The function of discussion in the public health is well acknowledged. However, development, as well as subsequent utilization of communications strategy to provide support to large-scale dynamics as well as quality improvement strategies in the healthcare, is still not examined in the peerreviewed literature. Communication initiative provides the framework for the way information associated with given healthcare shall be passed. Typically, communication is assessed at on personal foundation for instance evaluation of face-to-face associations between healthcare providers as well as consumers. Quantifying the efficiency as well as the effectiveness of communication on large is instead a challenge. This is because of the several modes of communication that create constraints to assess the impact of any single separate intervention. Conclusion QUALITY IMPROVEMENT IN HEALTHCARE SERVICES 10 Healthcare services are a critical component of a human. However, quality and safety are always needed in any healthcare services. There are certain issues that people encounter when they visit a healthcare facility that compromises the quality as well as the safety of this service. The evaluations such as the once concerning Jewish General Hospital are certain negligible issues that are not looked into but at times can have a bigger impact on the patients.Discussion: QUALITY IMPROVEMENT IN HEALTHCARE SERVICES To take of such issues proper leadership is normally recommended to enforce a reduction in such problems in the hospital. Falls are serious issues when it results in a major injury. A patient can fall and have an injury or get minor injuries as well. To avoid such incidences, leadership accompanied by communication as well as teamwork and qualified health professional can mitigate the levels of falls as those shown in the data of JGH. Those statistics of JGH are just a tip of the iceberg; there are numerous cases in a different hospital in Canada, USA, UK, and Russia among other nations of the world. Thus proper quality improvement strategy is important. QUALITY IMPROVEMENT IN HEALTHCARE SERVICES 11 References Balasubramanian, B. A., Cohen, D. J., Davis, M. M., Gunn, R., Dickinson, L. M., Miller, W. L., … & Stange, K. C. (2015). Learning evaluation: blending quality improvement and implementation research methods to study healthcare innovations. Implementation Science, 10(1), 31. Batalden, M., Batalden, P., Margolis, P., Seid, M., Armstrong, G., Opipari-Arrigan, L., & Hartung, H. (2015). Co-production of healthcare service. BMJ Qual Saf, BMJ’s-2015. Brownson, R. C., Deshpande, A. D., & Gillespie, K. N. (2017). Evidence-based public health. Oxford university press. Hansson, J., Höög, E., & Nyström, M. (2017). Action research for multi-level facilitation of improvement in health and social care: Development of a change facilitation approach for a local R&D unit. Action Research, 15(4), 339-356. Kaminski, M. F., Thomas-Gibson, S., Bugajski, M., Bretthauer, M., Rees, C. J., Dekker, E., … & Anderson, J. (2017). Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) quality improvement initiative. United European Gastroenterology journal, 5(3), 309-334. McFadden, K. L., Stock, G. N., & Gowen III, C. R. (2015). Leadership, safety climate, and continuous quality improvement: impact on process quality and patient safety. Health care management review, 40(1), 24-34. Nelson, R., & Staggers, N. (2016). Health Informatics-E-Book: An Interprofessional Approach. Elsevier Health Sciences. Ogrinc, G., Davies, L., Goodman, D., Batalden, P., Davidoff, F., & Stevens, D. (2016). SQUIRE 2.0—Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence—revised publication QUALITY IMPROVEMENT IN HEALTHCARE SERVICES 12 guidelines through a detailed consensus process. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 222(3), 317-323. Prince, M., Comas-Herrera, A., Knapp, M., Guerchet, M., & Karagiannidou, M. (2016). World Alzheimer report 2016: improving healthcare for people living with dementia: coverage, quality and costs now and in the future. Rutter, M. D., Senore, C., Bisschops, R., Domagk, D., Valori, R., Kaminski, M. F., … & Minozzi, S. (2016). The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy quality improvement initiative: developing performance measures. United European Gastroenterology Journal, 4(1), 30-41. QUALITY IMPROVEMENT IN HEALTHCARE SERVICES Appendices Figure 1 shows the reported patient falls that are not harming the patient Figure 2 shows reported patient falls that are causing minor injury. Figure 3 shows the patient falls that led to significant injuries. 13 … Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10