Discussion Thread: 4.1 How do critical global perspectives alter the nature, roles and utility of International Organizations (IOs)? (Due: 27 Jan 2020)

I’m studying for my Political Science class and need an explanation.

Discussion Thread: 4.1 How do critical global perspectives alter the nature, roles and utility of International Organizations (IOs)? (Due: 27 Jan 2020).

Course: International Organizations (PSC – 4400) Spring (2019/2020)

Book: International Organizations: Perspectives on Global Governance

Author(s): Kelly – Kate S. Pease

Edition: 6^th year 2019

ISBN: 978-0-81533-8046-7

Here is a copy of the book cover we are using:

Good Afternoon, This a Discussion Board for Political Science: International Organizations: Perspectives on Global Governance: (PSC-4400). (DUE: 27 Jan 2020 )

Follow instructions down below, preferably someone who is really good within Political Science.

Discussion Thread: 4.1 How do critical global perspectives alter the nature, roles and utility of International Organizations (IOs)?

1:How can more critical global perspectives, like Economic Structuralism and Feminism, change the perceived nature, roles and utility of IOs in global relations? How do the underlying assumptions of these two highly critical perspectives fit with or impact the unifying principles of key IOs, such as the UN, the European Union or the World Trade Organization?

2:In your opinion, what challenges do these two global perspectives, along with Constructivism, pose for the IO’s and their leadership in the decades to come? Please give some examples from the text.

Reference

Pease, K.S. (2019). International Organizations: Perspectives on Global Governance.New York, NY London Routledge.