Evaluation of Health Care Technology: DNP 805 Week 8 Assignment
Evaluation of Health Care Technology: DNP 805 Week 8 Assignment
Evaluation of Health Care Technology: DNP 805 Week 8 Assignment
For this Evaluation of Health Care Technology assignment, you will utilize content from the course materials as well as additional qualified resources to synthesize new information which you can apply towards your DPI Project, your future work area or your clinical practice as a DNP-prepared nurse.
General Guidelines for Evaluation of Health Care Technology:
Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source be included.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Directions for Evaluation of Health Care Technology:
For this assignment, write a 1,000-1,250 word paper in which you:
Select a technology that has been explored in the course.
Perform an assessment using elements of user-technology interface or human factors methods to determine functionality.
Using the content in the readings and textbook, list three elements that will be used to evaluate the user-technology interface.
Select a technology and list the elements that will be evaluated. Include their definition and describe how the element would be measured or evaluated.
For each element, propose practicable suggestions for improvement using support from the literature.
Portfolio Practice Hours
It may be possible to earn Portfolio Practice hours for this case report. Enter the following after the references section of your paper:
DNP 805 Week 8 Assignment Reflective Journal
Details:
Learners are required to maintain a reflective journal integrating leadership and inquiry into current practice.
In your journal, reflect on the personal knowledge and skills gained in the this course and address a variable combination of the following: new practice approaches, intraprofessional collaboration, health care delivery and clinical systems, ethical considerations in health care, population health concerns, the role of technology in improving health care outcomes, health policy, leadership and economic models, and/or health disparities. Outline what you have discovered about your professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses that surfaced, what additional resources and abilities could be introduced to a given situation to influence optimal outcomes, and finally how you met the competencies aligned to this course.
You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.
Submit your reflective journal both to the instructor and in the Typhon Tracking System under the corresponding course section. Failure to submit your journal in both the course room and Typhon systems may result in a grade of Incomplete for the course.
DNP 805 Topic 8 Discussion 1
For a specific patient population, select one application or a technology that could effectively increase patient engagement and patient outcomes for your future practice area or work focus. What elements of this application or technology are the most valuable to you? How could you improve this technology?
Researchers and clinicians have done studies to analyze the effects and effectiveness of using technology in patient care as health information technology (HIT) and health information systems (HIS) have become increasingly used in healthcare settings.
A technology evaluation framework is a set of principles for evaluating designs, objectives, subjects, methodologies, and data analysis abilities or processes in terms of technology (Eisenstein, Juzwishin, Kushniruk & Nahm, 2011; Yusof, Papazafeiropoulou, Paul & Stergioulas, 2008).
These guidelines assist in identifying issues and roadblocks in the deployment process, as well as the outputs and benefits of HIS, in order to improve IT applications and influence organizational decision-making (Anderson & Aydin, 2010; Sockolow, Bowles & Rogers, 2015; Yusof, Kuljis, Papazafeiropoulou & Stergioulas, 2008).
Various techniques to evaluate technology have been proposed by researchers.
According to the researchers, a socio-technical approach should be used because the focus of these assessments should ultimately be on the social practices within an organization rather than the technology itself.
Yusof (2015) proposed a framework for evaluation that considers human, organizational, and technology variables (Yusof, Papazafeiropoulou et al., 2008; Yusof Kuljis et al., 2008).
According to Sockolow et al. (2015), an evaluation framework for HIT should take into account organizational, systemic, environmental, and professional variables.
I propose a multidimensional framework that addresses four factors, as well as another framework that builds on current theories and models, in the following sections.
Technology, human, social, and timing factors all play a role in the framework.
Technological, human, social, and timing are the four fundamental aspects that make up the technology framework.
Factor of Technology
The evaluation framework is heavily reliant on technology (Yusof, Papazafeiropoulou, et al, 2008, Yusof, Kuljis et al., 2008).
Computers, according to Anderson and Aydin (2010), are an external force that causes changes in the behaviors of individuals and organizational units.
In the areas of system quality, information quality, and service quality, the technology factor has been defined as an HIS success factor (Yusof, 2015).
The structural aspects of hardware (system availability), software (usability), and functionality have been presented as part of an HIT evaluation methodology (tools and resources; Sockolow, et al., 2015).
This perspective emphasizes gadget function/performance over environmental and social interaction-related effects in studies that have taken this approach (Anderson & Aydin, 2010).
The Human Aspect
Technological design, according to Anderson and Adyin (2010), is a controlled process that addresses user needs.
The impact of users and designers on technical features is often encouraging in studies that take this approach.
Eisenstein et al. (2011) proposed a bioinformatics paradigm with three aspects of evaluation: domain, mechanism, and timing.
Whether the evaluation measures the information intervention or its outcomes is determined by the domain dimension.
The following is a list of the differences between formative and summative evaluations.
Summative assessments strive to ensure that people benefit from utilizing this technology, whereas formative evaluations aim to maximize a technology function.
The authors used the example of pacemaker makers to illustrate the differences between these two concepts.
These companies undertake formative reviews on pacemaker devices to confirm that they function as predicted (technical component), and then summative evaluations to ensure the devices safety and efficacy from the users standpoint (human factor).
Factor of Socialization
Humans use technology, and the environment has an impact on their actions (e.g., organizational regulations, social norms).
Furthermore, the use and impact of technology are influenced by complicated social connections (Anderson & Aydin, 2010).
While nurses may be enthusiastic about an online documentation system, physicians may be hesitant to use it in front of patients due to a lack of knowledge with the systems functionality.
Yusof, Kuljis, et al. (2008) suggested the human, organization, and technology-fit factors as a framework for evaluating HIS (HOT-fit).
The researchers conducted a study in which they interviewed users to ascertain the outcomes of a critical-care information system to demonstrate this concept.
The framework includes a technological factor (HIS success factors: system quality, information quality, and service quality), a human factor (system development, system usage), an organizational aspect (structure, environment), and a net benefit factor (overall IS impact; Yusof, 2015).
Factor of Timing
According to Eilsenstein et al. (2011), technology must be in use for a long enough period of time to generate a large enough volume of acceptable data for evaluation.
The timing of an evaluation dictates whether it takes place before or after a technology is implemented.
Because it addresses the diverse system development procedures utilized in the planning, analysis, design, implementation, and support phases, the system development life cycle (SDLC) demonstrates the temporal dimension.
In order to compare the effects of technological, human, and social aspects, HIT assessment frameworks use a cross-sectional design (Sockolow et al., 2015; Yusof, 2015).
As a result, the temporal element should be considered when interpreting results as technology designs and development processes improve, organizational regulations and policies are altered, and user habits change over time.
