HCA 812 Grand Canyon Week 1 Discussion 1

HCA 812 Grand Canyon Week 1 Discussion 1
HCA 812 Grand Canyon Week 1 Discussion 1
Consider the six organizational cases described by Blass in the module readings. Extending these ideas, under what circumstances could an
Individual forfeit the right to self-regulation? Why? At what point, if any, does self-regulation become unethical? Why?
HCA 812 Grand Canyon Week 1 Discussion 2
Modern health care is being significantly influenced by external regulations such as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). Could more stringent self-regulation by health care professionals and related organizations have eliminated the perceived necessity for laws such as HIPAA? Why or why not?
HCA 812 Grand Canyon Week 7 Assignment
Licensing, Credentialing, and Self-Regulation
While professional licensing and credentialing are significant aspects of the health care industry, the role of self-regulation cannot be overlooked. In this assignment, you will consider how self-regulation works with professional licensing and credentialing to provide a comprehensive plan for assuring quality of patient care and organizational sustainability.
General Requirements:
Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:
Instructors will be using a grading rubric to grade the assignments. It is recommended that learners review
HCA 812 Grand Canyon Week 1 Discussion 1
the rubric prior to beginning the assignment in order to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source be included.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin.
Directions:
Research several professional licensing and credentialing bodies in health care in order to understand their intended role in the health care industry.
Write a paper (1,000-1,250 words) that assesses the value of professional credentialing in the health care industry. Include the following in your paper:
A discussion of the intended role of licensing and credentialing.
A discussion of the intended role of self-regulation in relation to licensing and credentialing.3
An evaluation of the influence of self-regulation and professional licensing and credentialing on the sustainability of health care organizations and the quality of patient care.
Scholars share some of the blame.
Their descriptions of learning institutions have frequently been respectful and idealistic, replete with near-mystical jargon.
They would have you believe that paradise is just around the corner.
Learning organizations are places “where people continually expand their capacity to create the results they truly desire, where new and expansive patterns of thinking are nurtured, where collective aspiration is set free, and where people are continually learning how to learn together,” according to Peter Senge, who popularized them in his book The Fifth Discipline.
1
Senge proposed the employment of five “component technologies” to attain these goals: systems thinking, personal mastery, mental models, shared vision, and team learning.
Ikujiro Nonaka, in a similar vein, described knowledge-creating firms as locations where “developing new knowledge is not a specialized activity…it is a manner of behaving, indeed, a way of being, in which everyone is a knowledge worker.”
2
Companies should employ metaphors and organizational redundancy, according to Nonaka, to focus thinking, foster conversation, and make implicit, instinctively known ideas apparent.
Isn’t that idyllic?
Absolutely.
Desirable?
Without a doubt.
Is it, however, a basis for action?
Hardly.
The guidelines are just too general, and there are far too many unsolved questions.
How will managers, for example, know when their companies have transformed into learning organizations?
What specific behavioral adjustments are required?
What policies and programs are required?
What’s the best way to get from here to there?
The majority of learning organization talks elucidate these points.
Rather than the nitty-gritty specifics of practice, they focus on high philosophy and great ideas, sweeping metaphors.
Three important issues remain unsolved, despite the fact that each is critical to successful deployment.
The first is the issue of meaning.
We require a credible, well-founded definition of learning organizations that is both actionable and simple to implement.
The second issue is one of management.
We need clearer practice standards that are filled with practical guidance rather than lofty goals.
Then there’s the issue of measuring.
To ensure that improvements have been accomplished, we need improved techniques for assessing an organization’s rate and level of learning.
Managers will have a stronger foundation for starting learning organizations after these “three Ms” are addressed.
Progress is unlikely without this foundation, and for the most basic of reasons.
Learning must first be comprehended before it can become a significant business aim.
What is the definition of a learning organization?
Surprisingly, a precise definition of learning has been difficult to come by over time.
Learning has been researched by organizational theorists for a long time, but the accompanying quotations indicate that there is still a lot of dispute (see the insert “Definitions of Organizational Learning”).
Most academics see organizational learning as a long-term process that leads to knowledge gain and enhanced performance.
However, they disagree on a number of key issues.