Intervention Presentation on Diabetes Discussion

Want create site? With you can do it easy.

Intervention Presentation on Diabetes Discussion

Intervention Presentation on Diabetes Discussion

Evidence-Based Practice Project: Intervention Presentation on Diabetes

Struggling to find relevant content or pressed for time? – Don’t worry, we have a team of professionals to help you on
Intervention Presentation on Diabetes Discussion
Get a 15% Discount on this Paper
Order Now

Chosen Topic- Continuous glucose monitoring: The achievement of 100 years of innovation in diabetes technology.

https://www-sciencedirect-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/science/article/pii/S0168822720307592?via%3Dihub

All the above information will give you a clue to the assignment, the topic was from the above web site

5 slides with speaker notes are required for the assignment.

1. CGM (continuous glucose monitoring, why it is important and how it is used)

Include information about patient specific population

2. Evidence on its safety and how it works (data on advantages of this device over other glucose monitoring devices)

Find second article discussion benefits of CGM devices?? (we need two sources)

3. What are the costs, risks, time frame to work for each device, etc?

 

You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.

Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.

Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.

The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS

Discussion Questions (DQ)

Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words.
Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source.
One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words.
I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.
Weekly Participation

Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately.
In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies.
Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work).
Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.
APA Format and Writing Quality

Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required).
Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation.
I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.
Use of Direct Quotes

I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly.
As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content.
It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.
LopesWrite Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.
Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.
Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?
Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.
Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.
Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.
If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.
I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.
As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.
Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:
Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.
Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.

CLC – Evidence-Based Practice Project: Intervention Presentation on Diabetes – Rubric

Criteria Description

Article

5. Excellent

7.5 points

The article is published in the last 5 years, has a focus on an intervention or treatment tool for managing diabetes in adults or children. The article has direct application to nursing practice.

4. Good

6.68 points

The article is published in the last 5 years, has a focus on an intervention or treatment tool for managing diabetes in adults or children. The article has general application to nursing practice.

3. Satisfactory

5.93 points

The article is published in the last 5 years and has a general focus on an intervention or treatment tool for managing diabetes in adults or children. The article has some application to nursing practice.

2. Less than Satisfactory

5.63 points

The article fails to meet most of the assignment criteria; the article is not relevant to nursing practice.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The article is omitted or fails to meet the assignment criteria.

Criteria Description

Intervention or Treatment Tool and Specific Patient Population of Study

5. Excellent

7.5 points

A thorough description of the intervention or treatment tool and the specific patient population used in the study is presented.

4. Good

6.68 points

A description of the intervention or treatment tool and the specific patient population used in the study is presented. Minor detail is needed for clarity or accuracy.

3. Satisfactory

5.93 points

A summary of the intervention or treatment tool and the specific patient population used in the study is presented. Some aspects require more detail for clarity. There are minor inaccuracies.

2. Less than Satisfactory

5.63 points

An incomplete summary of the intervention, or treatment tool, and the specific patient population used in the study is presented. There are significant gaps and inaccuracies.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Intervention, or treatment tool, and the specific patient population used in the study are omitted or inaccurate.

Criteria Description

Summary of Article

5. Excellent

22.5 points

A thorough summary of the article is presented. The summary accurately presents the main idea for a specific patient population and the clinical findings, and clearly illustrates relevance to diabetes and nursing practice.

4. Good

20.03 points

A summary of the article is presented. The summary presents the main idea for a specific patient population, the clinical findings, and the relevance to diabetes and nursing practice. Some detail or information is needed for clarity.

3. Satisfactory

17.78 points

A summary of the article is presented. The summary generally presents the main idea for a specific patient population, the clinical findings, and the relevance to diabetes and nursing practice. There are some inaccuracies. More information is needed.

2. Less than Satisfactory

16.88 points

A partial summary of the article is presented. There are major omissions. The summary fails to accurately represent the main idea for a specific patient population, the clinical findings, or the relevance to diabetes and nursing practice.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The summary is omitted or fails to meet the assignment criteria.

Criteria Description

Inclusion of the Psychological, Cultural, and Spiritual Aspects

5. Excellent

22.5 points

A compelling explanation for why the psychological, cultural and spiritual aspects is important to consider for a patient who has been diagnosed with diabetes is presented. The explanation is well-developed and contains strong reasoning and rationale for support.

4. Good

20.03 points

An explanation of why the psychological, cultural, and spiritual aspects is important to consider for a patient who has been diagnosed with diabetes is presented. The explanation contains adequate reasoning or rationale provided for support. Some detail is needed for clarity.

3. Satisfactory

17.78 points

A general explanation of why the psychological, cultural and spiritual aspects is important to consider for a patient who has been diagnosed with diabetes is presented. The explanation contains some omissions and inaccuracies. General reasoning or rationale is provided for support.

2. Less than Satisfactory

16.88 points

A partial explanation of why the psychological, cultural, and spiritual aspects is important to consider for a patient who has been diagnosed with diabetes is presented. The explanation contains significant omissions and inaccuracies. Reasoning or rationale is not provided for support.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Explanation of why the psychological, cultural, and spiritual aspects are important to consider for patient who has been diagnosed with diabetes is omitted.

Criteria Description

Presentation of Content

5. Excellent

60 points

The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.

4. Good

53.4 points

The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes persuasive information from reliable sources.

3. Satisfactory

47.4 points

The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other.

2. Less than Satisfactory

45 points

The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear.

Criteria Description

Layout

5. Excellent

7.5 points

The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.

4. Good

6.68 points

The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.

3. Satisfactory

5.93 points

The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability.

2. Less than Satisfactory

5.63 points

The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.

Criteria Description

Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)

5. Excellent

7.5 points

The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.

4. Good

6.68 points

The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.

3. Satisfactory

5.93 points

Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.

2. Less than Satisfactory

5.63 points

Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

5. Excellent

7.5 points

Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic English.

4. Good

6.68 points

Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present.

3. Satisfactory

5.93 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader.

2. Less than Satisfactory

5.63 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.

Criteria Description

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

5. Excellent

7.5 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

4. Good

6.68 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

3. Satisfactory

5.93 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

2. Less than Satisfactory

5.63 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Sources are not documented.

Total 150 points
Did you find apk for android? You can find new and apps.

Calculate the price
Make an order in advance and get the best price
Pages (550 words)
$0.00
*Price with a welcome 15% discount applied.
Pro tip: If you want to save more money and pay the lowest price, you need to set a more extended deadline.
We know how difficult it is to be a student these days. That's why our prices are one of the most affordable on the market, and there are no hidden fees.

Instead, we offer bonuses, discounts, and free services to make your experience outstanding.
How it works
Receive a 100% original paper that will pass Turnitin from a top essay writing service
step 1
Upload your instructions
Fill out the order form and provide paper details. You can even attach screenshots or add additional instructions later. If something is not clear or missing, the writer will contact you for clarification.
Pro service tips
How to get the most out of your experience with MyCoursebay
One writer throughout the entire course
If you like the writer, you can hire them again. Just copy & paste their ID on the order form ("Preferred Writer's ID" field). This way, your vocabulary will be uniform, and the writer will be aware of your needs.
The same paper from different writers
You can order essay or any other work from two different writers to choose the best one or give another version to a friend. This can be done through the add-on "Same paper from another writer."
Copy of sources used by the writer
Our college essay writers work with ScienceDirect and other databases. They can send you articles or materials used in PDF or through screenshots. Just tick the "Copy of sources" field on the order form.
Testimonials
See why 20k+ students have chosen us as their sole writing assistance provider
Check out the latest reviews and opinions submitted by real customers worldwide and make an informed decision.
Social Work and Human Services
Excellent Work!
Customer 452587, August 24th, 2021
Nursing
Thank you for a great paper.
Customer 452707, August 6th, 2022
Mental Wellness
The skilled writer did a good job. I will add a few more details. Thank you, great job...
Customer 452547, June 17th, 2021
Social Work and Human Services
Great Work!
Customer 452587, November 2nd, 2021
Social Work and Human Services
Excellent work
Customer 452587, September 4th, 2021
Social Work and Human Services
Great Work !!!
Customer 452587, November 9th, 2021
Nursing
Fantastic work on this project as usual.
Customer 452707, July 5th, 2022
Nursing
This is great! Thank you
Customer 452679, December 16th, 2021
Social Work and Human Services
Excellent!
Customer 452587, August 3rd, 2021
Web programming
thank you so much. This was very helpful and I was able to understand the assignment better after seeing it completed.
Customer 452715, September 22nd, 2022
Nursing
A-1 service every single time!!!
Customer 452453, July 27th, 2021
Other
nice
Customer 452813, June 25th, 2022
11,595
Customer reviews in total
96%
Current satisfaction rate
3 pages
Average paper length
37%
Customers referred by a friend
OUR GIFT TO YOU
15% OFF your first order
Use a coupon FIRST15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Claim my 15% OFF Order in Chat

Get your perfect essay with a 15% discount. Use DC15

NEW

Thank you for choosing MyCoursebay. Your presence is a motivation to us. All papers are written from scratch. Plagiarism is not tolerated. Order now for a 15% discount

Order Now