IOM Future Of Nursing Report

IOM Future Of Nursing Report
IOM Future Of Nursing Report
Learning outcome:
LO8:
Name:
1. Instructions and guidelines (Read carefully)
Instructions
Insert your name and surname in the space provided above, as well as in the file name. Save the file as: First name Surname Assignment 4 – e.g. Lilly Smith Assignment 4. NB: Please ensure that you use the name that appears in your student profile on the Online Campus.
2 Write all your answers in this document. There is an instruction that says, “Start writing here” under each question. Please type your answer there.
3 Submit your assignment in Microsoft Word only. No other file types will be accepted.
4 Do not delete the plagiarism declaration or the assignment instructions and guidelines. They must remain on your assignment when you submit.
PLEASE NOTE: Plagiarism cases will be penalised according to the Head Tutor’s and GetSmarter’s discretion.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: Please ensure that you have checked your course calendar for the due date for this assignment.
Guidelines
1 There are eight pages and one question in this assignment.
2 Make sure that you have carefully read and fully understood the questions before answering them. Answer the questions fully but concisely and as directly as possible. Follow all specific instructions for individual questions (e. g. “list”, “in point form”).
3 Answer all questions in your own words. Do not copy any text from the notes, readings or other sources. The assignment must be your own work only.
Plagiarism Declaration:
1. I know that plagiarism is wrong. Plagiarism is to use another’s work and pretend that it is one’s own.
2. This assignment is my own work.
3. I have not allowed, and will not allow, anyone to copy my work with the intention of passing it off as his or her own work.
4. I acknowledge that copying someone else’s assignment (or part of it) is wrong, and declare that my assignments are my own work.
2. Mark allocation
Each question receives a mark allocation. However, you will only receive a final percentage mark and will not be given individual marks for each question. The mark allocation is there to show you the weighting and length of each question.
TOTAL 50
Assignment instructions
Complete Question 1 in this document. Make sure you have read Modules 3 and 4 before completing this assignment.
Note:
Make sure that you show all your workings within the assignment when calculations are required.
You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.
Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.
Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.
The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.
IOM Future of Nursing Report and Nursing
IOM Future of Nursing Report and Nursing – Rubric
Collapse All IOM Future Of Nursing Report And Nursing – RubricCollapse All
Robert Wood Foundation Committee Work and IOM Report
16.5 points
Criteria Description
Robert Wood Foundation Committee Work and IOM Report
5. Excellent
16.5 points
A clear and accurate description of the work of the Robert Wood Foundation Committee Initiative that led to the IOM report is presented.
4. Good
14.69 points
A description of the work of the Robert Wood Foundation Committee Initiative that led to the IOM report is presented. There are slight inaccuracies.
3. Satisfactory
13.04 points
A summary of the work of the Robert Wood Foundation Committee Initiative that led to the IOM report is presented. There are inaccuracies or misinterpretations.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
12.38 points
An incomplete description of the work of the Robert Wood Foundation Committee Initiative that led to the IOM report is presented.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
A description of the work of the Robert Wood Foundation Committee Initiative that led to the IOM report is omitted.
Key Messages Transforming Nursing
24.75 points
Criteria Description
Key Messages Transforming Nursing
5. Excellent
24.75 points
The four key messages that structure the IOM report are clearly outlined. A description of how these transformed nursing practice, nursing education and training, nursing leadership, and nursing workforce development are thoroughly discussed.
4. Good
22.03 points
The four key messages that structure the IOM report are outlined. A description of how these transformed key aspects of nursing is presented.
3. Satisfactory
19.55 points
The four key messages that structure the IOM report are generally outlined. A summary of how these transformed some aspects of nursing is presented, but there are some inaccuracies.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
18.56 points
Fewer than four key messages are presented, and the messages contain inaccuracies. An incomplete discussion on how they transformed nursing is presented.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
The four key messages are omitted.
State-Based Action Coalitions and Their Help in Advancing Goals form IOM Report
24.75 points
Criteria Description
State-Based Action Coalitions and Their Help in Advancing Goals form IOM Report
5. Excellent
24.75 points
The role of state-based action coalitions is thoroughly discussed. A detailed and accurate discussion of how they help advance the goals in the IOM report is presented.
4. Good
22.03 points
The role of state-based action coalitions is discussed. A discussion of how they help advance the goals in the IOM report is presented.
3. Satisfactory
19.55 points
The role of state-based action coalitions is summarized. A summary of how they help advance the goals in the IOM report is presented.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
18.56 points
The role of state-based action coalitions is incomplete. It is unclear how these advance the goals in the IOM report.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
The role of state-based action coalitions is omitted.
State Action Coalition Initiatives Advancing Nursing Profession
33 points
Criteria Description
State Action Coalition Initiatives Advancing Nursing Profession
5. Excellent
33 points
Two initiatives spearheaded by a state action coalition and how they advance the nursing profession are thoroughly discussed. The discussion demonstrates a clear understanding of the state action committee and the role in advancing the nursing profession.
4. Good
29.37 points
Two initiatives spearheaded by a state action coalition and how they advance the nursing profession are discussed.
3. Satisfactory
26.07 points
Two initiatives spearheaded by a state action coalition are summarized. How these initiatives advance the nursing profession are generally discussed. There are some inaccuracies.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
24.75 points
Only one initiative spearheaded by a state action coalition is presented. The narrative contains omissions and inaccuracies. How these initiatives advance the nursing profession are incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Initiatives spearheaded by a state action coalition are omitted.
Barriers to Advancement
33 points
Criteria Description
Barriers to Advancement
5. Excellent
33 points
Barriers to advancement that currently exist in the state are thoroughly explored and how nursing advocates in the state overcome barriers are thoroughly described.
4. Good
29.37 points
Barriers to advancement that currently exist in the state and how nursing advocates in the state overcome barriers are described.
3. Satisfactory
26.07 points
Barriers to advancement that currently exist in the state are presented. How nursing advocates in the state overcome barriers is summarized. There are inaccuracies, or more information is needed.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
24.75 points
Barriers to advancement that currently exist in the state are unclear. How nursing advocates in the state overcome barriers is incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Barriers to advancement that currently exist in the state are omitted. How nursing advocates in the state overcome barriers is omitted.
Thesis Development and Purpose
8.25 points
Criteria Description
Thesis Development and Purpose
5. Excellent
8.25 points
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
4. Good
7.34 points
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
3. Satisfactory
6.52 points
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
6.19 points
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Argument Logic and Construction
8.25 points
Criteria Description
Argument Logic and Construction
5. Excellent
8.25 points
Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
4. Good
7.34 points
Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
3. Satisfactory
6.52 points
Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
6.19 points
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
8.25 points
Criteria Description
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
5. Excellent
8.25 points
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
4. Good
7.34 points
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.
3. Satisfactory
6.52 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
6.19 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
3.3 points
Criteria Description
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
5. Excellent
3.3 points
All format elements are correct.
4. Good
2.94 points
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
3. Satisfactory
2.61 points
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
2.47 points
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
Documentation of Sources
4.95 points
Criteria Description
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
5. Excellent
4.95 points
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
4. Good
4.41 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
3. Satisfactory
3.91 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
3.71 points
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Sources are not documented.
Total 165 points