MGMT 321 Aviation System Analysis. Create your ISD utilizing Microsoft Visio®

I need help with a Management question. All explanations and answers will be used to help me learn.

Struggling to find relevant content or pressed for time? – Don’t worry, we have a team of professionals to help you on
MGMT 321 Aviation System Analysis. Create your ISD utilizing Microsoft Visio®
Get a 15% Discount on this Paper
Order Now

Hi!

Here are the instructions for this assignment:

Group Project Design Phase: Part 1

Create your ISD utilizing Microsoft Visio®. Create a new ISD from scratch for this activity.

Ensure that you select the Categories (not Featured) menu selection from above the templates that are presented and select General/Basic Diagram. Once you open a basic diagram, select More Shapes/Software & Database/Software/UML Class in the Shapes menu. You will drag/drop/modify the Class shape to represent your interface elements.

The name data must be presented in text boxes that are reflective of the interface elements (screens, forms, and reports) that will be presented to the users of the information system. A tree-type numbering system for the interface elements must be utilized.

When evaluating the menus, be sure to consider those that might be associated with the aviation-related business.

Your ISD data must address the following requirements:

  • Submit your ISD in a Portrait orientation.
  • Submit the following data in your ISD:
    • Do not follow the data presented in Figure 9-10 in the textbook
    • ONE main menu interface element.
    • Title the main menu interface element “Main Menu.”
    • Number the main menu interface element ‘0’ (zero) in the top section and “1.1” in the bottom section.
    • TWO submenu interface elements under the main menu.
    • Title the two submenu interface elements with the same noun-related titles of the two Data Stores in the DFD fragments submitted in Module 6.
    • Number the two submenu interface elements as follows:
      • “1” and “2” in the top sections.
      • “1.1.1” and “1.1.2” in the bottom sections.
    • Number the submenu interface elements in the top and bottom sections relative to the main menu numbers.
    • THREE interface elements (screens, forms, or reports) per submenu interface element.
    • Title the interface elements (screens, forms, or reports) with the same verb-related data of the two processes in the DFD fragments in Module 6. Note: You will have to create a new type of IMS process data for each submenu interface element to fulfill the requirement for THREE interface elements.
    • Number the interface elements (screens, forms, or reports) in the top and bottom sections relative to the submenu interface element numbers.
      • “1.1,” “1.2,” “1.3” in the top sections for the three interface elements (screens, forms, or reports) of submenu “1.”
      • “2.1,” “2.2,” And “2.3” in the top sections for the three interface elements (screens, forms, or reports) of submenu “2.”
      • “1.1.1” in each of the bottom sections of the three interface elements (screens, forms, or reports) of submenu “1.”
      • “1.1.2” in each of the bottom sections of the three interface elements (screens, forms, or reports) of submenu “2.”
  • Submit your ISD in VSDX file format.

Here is the grading rubic:

MGMT 321 8.3 Group Project Design Phase: Part 1 Rubric

MGMT 321 8.3 Group Project Design Phase: Part 1 Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Deliverable Requirements The percentage of the deliverable(s) that meet the assignment’s requirements.

40.0 pts Excellent

The deliverable(s) met ALL of the assignment’s requirements.

35.0 pts Very Good

The deliverable(s) met MOST of the assignment’s requirements.

30.0 pts Satisfactory

The deliverable(s) met MANY of the assignment’s requirements.

25.0 pts Near Failing

The deliverable(s) met SOME of the assignment’s requirements.

0.0 pts Failing

The deliverable(s) did NOT meet ANY of the assignment’s requirements.

40.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Quality of Team Deliverable(s) The composition and details of the team deliverable(s) that were submitted for evaluation.

20.0 pts Excellent

The composition and details of the team deliverable(s) were presented at a VERY HIGH level.

18.0 pts Very Good

The composition and details of the team deliverable(s) were presented at a HIGH level.

16.0 pts Satisfactory

The composition and details of the team deliverable(s) were presented at a MODERATE level.

14.0 pts Near Failing

The composition and details of the team deliverable(s) were presented at a LOW level.

0.0 pts Failing

The composition and details of the team deliverable(s) were presented at an UNSATISFACTORY level.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Accuracy of the Team Deliverable(s) The accuracy of the values in the team deliverable(s) that were submitted for evaluation .

20.0 pts Excellent

ALL of the data in the team deliverable(s) were accurate.

18.0 pts Very Good

MOST of the data in the team deliverable(s) were accurate.

16.0 pts Satisfactory

MUCH of the data in the team deliverable(s) were accurate.

14.0 pts Near Failing

SOME of the data in the team deliverable(s) were accurate.

0.0 pts Failing

NONE of the data in the deliverable(s) were accurate.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Quality of Individual Team Member Data The quality of the data that the team member uploaded into the Canvas Files directory.

10.0 pts Excellent

The composition and details of the individual deliverable(s) were presented at a VERY HIGH level.

8.0 pts Very Good

The composition and details of the individual deliverable(s) were presented at a HIGH level.

6.0 pts Satisfactory

The composition and details of the individual deliverable(s) were presented at a MODERATE level.

4.0 pts Near Failing

The composition and details of the individual deliverable(s) were presented at a LOW level.

0.0 pts Failing

The composition and details of the individual deliverable(s) were presented at an UNSATISFACTORY level.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Team Member Communications & Participation The team member’s responsiveness to communications and timeliness in meeting the assignment deadlines.

10.0 pts Excellent

The team member’s communications and participation were at a VERY HIGH level.

8.0 pts Very Good

The team member’s communications and participation were at a HIGH level.

6.0 pts Satisfactory

The team member’s communications and participation were at a MODERATE level.

4.0 pts Near Failing

The team member’s communications and participation were at a LOW level.

0.0 pts Failing

The team member’s communications and participation were at an UNSATISFACTORY level.

10.0 pts

Total Points: 100.0

Calculate the price
Make an order in advance and get the best price
Pages (550 words)
$0.00
*Price with a welcome 15% discount applied.
Pro tip: If you want to save more money and pay the lowest price, you need to set a more extended deadline.
We know how difficult it is to be a student these days. That's why our prices are one of the most affordable on the market, and there are no hidden fees.

Instead, we offer bonuses, discounts, and free services to make your experience outstanding.
Sign up, place your order, and leave the rest to our professional paper writers in less than 2 minutes.
step 1
Upload assignment instructions
Fill out the order form and provide paper details. You can even attach screenshots or add additional instructions later. If something is not clear or missing, the writer will contact you for clarification.
s
Get personalized services with MyCoursebay
One writer for all your papers
You can select one writer for all your papers. This option enhances the consistency in the quality of your assignments. Select your preferred writer from the list of writers who have handledf your previous assignments
Same paper from different writers
Are you ordering the same assignment for a friend? You can get the same paper from different writers. The goal is to produce 100% unique and original papers
Copy of sources used
Our homework writers will provide you with copies of sources used on your request. Just add the option when plaing your order
What our partners say about us
We appreciate every review and are always looking for ways to grow. See what other students think about our do my paper service.
Other
thanks
Customer 452653, October 31st, 2021
Psychology
Excellent!!!!
Customer 452587, July 28th, 2021
Social Work and Human Services
Excellent Work
Customer 452587, November 22nd, 2021
Nursing
Thank you for the great job and timely delivery.
Customer 452457, December 18th, 2020
Other
GREAT
Customer 452813, September 20th, 2022
Human Resources Management (HRM)
Thank you
Customer 452701, July 26th, 2023
Nursing
Fantastic work on this project as usual.
Customer 452707, July 5th, 2022
Medicine
Great job! Thank you.
Customer 452707, May 29th, 2022
Accounting
Thanks for your support
Customer 452701, February 3rd, 2022
Criminal Justice
Impressive! Will be using the service again.
Customer 452485, December 5th, 2021
Career Development
Beautiful job
Customer 452901, April 16th, 2024
Psychology
The paper is well written and professional. I highly recommend
Customer 452485, August 22nd, 2021
OUR GIFT TO YOU
15% OFF your first order
Use a coupon FIRST15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Claim my 15% OFF Order in Chat

Good News ! We now help with PROCTORED EXAM. Chat with a support agent for more information