New York Times Article Editorial Analysis | Instant Homework Solutions
Provide an editorial analysis of the following NEW YORK TIMES ARTICLE https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/10/us/census-undocumented-trump.html 1. Summarize the article and give your educated insight to it? 2. Write 5-7 sentences with APA formatting? 3. Add the link of the news article to the document? Federal Court Rejects Trumps Order to Exclude Undocumented From Census A three-judge panel unanimously said President Trump lacks the authority to remove noncitizens from census counts used to allot House seats. A census site in Greenville, Texas. States with large immigrant populations like Texas, California, Florida would have lost congressional representation under President Trumps order. Otero/Associated Press By Michael Wines Sept. 10, 2020 Updated 7:59 p.m. ET WASHINGTON A federal court on Thursday rejected President Trumps order to exclude unauthorized immigrants from population counts that will be used next year to reallocate seats in the House of Representatives, ruling that it was so obviously illegal that a lawsuit challenging the order need not go to a trial. The court, a three-judge panel in Federal District Court in Manhattan, said Mr. Trumps proposal exceeded his authority under federal law governing the census. The panel said there was no need to consider a second claim in the lawsuit that the presidents order violated the Constitutions requirement to base apportionment of the House on the whole number of persons in each state. The merits of the parties dispute are not particularly close or complicated, the judges wrote in granting summary judgment to the plaintiffs, a view that was broadly shared by legal scholars. Two of the judges, Richard C. Wesley and Peter W. Hall, were named to the bench by President George W. Bush. The third, Jesse M. Furman, was nominated by President Barack Obama. The case involved lawsuits brought by two sets of plaintiffs, one a group of state and local governments and the United States Conference of Mayors, and the second a coalition of advocacy groups and other nongovernmental organizations. The groups argued that Mr. Trumps order would cause some of them to lose representation in the House and would damage all of them by leading to a less accurate census. Since the first census was taken in 1790, the number of seats each state holds in the House of Representatives has been based on counts of everyone living in the United States regardless of citizenship or legal status, except for slaves during roughly the nations first 90 years. Mr. Trump tried to scrap that process in July, telling the Commerce Department in a memorandum that the Census Bureau should produce two population counts one the same as those taken every decade, and the other an estimate of the number of unauthorized immigrants living in each state. Subtracting the immigrant population from census totals would have excluded millions of people from the population counts used for reapportionment, reducing the number of House seats allotted to states with large immigrant populations like California, Texas and Florida. Those seats would have been redistributed to states with few unauthorized immigrants in particular Alabama, which is projected to lose a House seat next year. A version of this article appears in print on Sept. 11, 2020, Section A, Page 17 of the New York edition with the headline: Court Halts Trumps Order to Exclude Undocumented Immigrants From Census. Order Reprints | Todays Paper | Subscribe
