NR305 Assignment: Family Genetics

NR305 Assignment: Family Genetics
NR305 Assignment: Family Genetics
NR305 Assignment: Family Genetics
NR305 Milestone 2: Patient Teaching Plan Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts Introduction/ Identification (Based on information gathered from the completion of the Family Genetic History and Milestone 1 assignments, identify one preventable disease that the adult participant is at increased risk for developing and choose one modifiable risk factor that is contributing to their increased risk for developing this disease. Provide rationale why this modifiable risk factor is contributing to this individual’s risk for developing this specific disease. Cite family history, current symptoms, and cultural considerations if present.) Correctly identifies one preventable disease and corresponding modifiable risk factor. Provides in-depth rationale including family history, current symptoms, and cultural considerations for why the adult participant is at increased risk for developing this disease. 70.0 pts Correctly identifies one preventable disease and corresponding modifiable risk factor. Provides some rationale for why the adult participant is at increased risk for developing this disease but does not include family history, current symptoms, or cultural considerations. 62.0 pts Correctly identifies one preventable disease and corresponding modifiable risk factor but provides wrong rationale for why the adult participant is at increased risk for developing this disease. 56.0 pts Correctly identifies one preventable disease, but does not identify a modifiable risk factor. 27.0 pts Does not identify one preventable disease. 0.0 pts 70.0 pts Intervention (Choose one evidence-based intervention shown to be effective at reducing an individual’s risk for developing the preventable disease identified. Create a teaching plan to present this information to your adult participant. Support the use of this intervention with at least one current scholarly source and information gathered from Healthy People 2020. Relate one or two additional, relevant resources such as handouts or websites as applicable.) Chooses one evidence-based intervention shown to be effective at reducing an individual’s risk for developing the specific disease chosen. Thoroughly supports the use of this intervention with at least one current scholarly source AND information gathered from Healthy People 2020. Additional resources that may be of value to the individual such as handouts or websites are included. 100.0 pts Chooses one evidence-based intervention shown to be effective at reducing an individual’s risk for developing the specific disease chosen. Supports the use of this intervention with current scholarly sources OR information gathered from Healthy People 2020. Additional resources that may be of value to the individual such as handouts or websites are included. 88.0 pts Chooses one evidence-based intervention shown to be effective at reducing an individual’s risk for developing the specific disease chosen. Supports the use of this intervention with current but not scholarly sources. Additional resources that may be of value to the individual such as handouts or websites is included. 80.0 pts Chooses one evidence-based intervention shown to be effective at reducing an individual’s risk for developing the specific disease chosen but does not support the use of this intervention with any sources. 38.0 pts Fails to choose one evidence-based intervention that is shown to be effective at reducing an individual’s risk for developing the specific disease chosen. 0.0 pts 100.0 pts Evaluation (You will not have an opportunity to evaluate the effectiveness of your teaching plan. Instead, comment on what criteria you would measure in order to evaluate the effectiveness of your plan. Include additional steps to be considered if the plan would prove to be unsuccessful.) Criteria listed to thoroughly evaluate effectiveness of health education provided in meeting established short and long-term goals. Includes measures to be implemented if initial plan were shown to be ineffective. 30.0 pts Criteria listed mostly evaluates effectiveness of health education provided in meeting established short or long-term goals. Includes measures to be implemented if initial plan were shown to be ineffective. 26.0 pts Criteria listed partially evaluates effectiveness of health education or does not Include measures to be implemented if initial plan were shown to be ineffective. 24.0 pts Criteria listed but it does not evaluate the effectiveness of health education, and does not include measures to be implemented if initial plan were shown to be ineffective. 11.0 pts No evaluation criteria listed. 0.0 pts 30.0 pts Summary (The summary reiterates the main points of the presentation and concludes with what you are hoping to accomplish as a result of implementing the use of the chosen intervention.) Summary thoroughly reiterates the main points of the presentation and concludes with an in-depth description of what you are hoping to accomplish by implementing the chosen intervention. 20.0 pts Summary mostly reiterates the main points of the presentation and concludes with a description of what you are hoping to accomplish by implementing the chosen intervention. 18.0 pts Summary reiterates a few main points and concludes with a brief description of what you are hoping to accomplish by implementing the chosen intervention. 16.0 pts Summary is present but fails to capture the main points and lacks a brief description of what is hoped to be accomplished. 8.0 pts No summary included or fails to reiterate main points of the presentation. 0.0 pts 20.0 pts Clarity of Presentation (Total of 10–14 slides (not including title and Reference slides), appropriate graphics that add visual appeal, proper grammar, spelling, and professional terminology to aid in patient understanding, no medical jargon. Detailed speaker notes are required.) Includes 10–14 slides (not including title and reference slides), uses appropriate graphics for visual appeal, uses proper grammar, spelling, and professional terminology to aid in patient understanding rather than medical jargon. Includes detailed speaker notes, introduction, and summary. 30.0 pts Includes 10–14 slides (with title and reference slides), uses appropriate graphics for visual appeal, uses proper grammar, spelling, and professional terminology to aid in patient understanding rather than medical jargon. Includes speaker notes, but they are lacking detail. Introduction and summary are included. 26.0 pts Includes 10–14 slides (with title and reference slides), uses graphics that do not add to the message, uses proper grammar, spelling, and professional terminology rather than medical jargon. Includes speaker notes but they lack detail. 24.0 pts Includes 10-14 slides (with title and reference slides), lacks graphics or uses ones that are inappropriate or lack visual appeal. No speaker notes included. Introduction or summary is missing. 11.0 pts Presentation does not meet the required number of slides even when including title and reference slides, contains multiple spelling or grammatical errors or contains excessive amounts of medical jargon not appropriate for patient teaching. 0.0 pts 30.0 pts Total Points: 250.0