NRS 433 Revise the PICOT Question you Wrote in the Topic 1 Assignment Using the Feedback you Received from your Instructor

NRS 433 Revise the PICOT Question you Wrote in the Topic 1 Assignment Using the Feedback you Received from your Instructor
Prepare this assignment as a 1,500-1,750 word paper using the instructor feedback from the previous course assignments and the guidelines below.
PICOT Question
Revise the PICOT question you wrote in the Topic 1 assignment using the feedback you received from your instructor.
The final PICOT question will provide a framework for your capstone project (the project students must complete during their final course in the RN-BSN program of study).
Research Critiques
In the Topic 2 and Topic 3 assignments, you completed a qualitative and quantitative research critique on two articles for each type of study (4 articles total). Use the feedback you received from your instructor on these assignments to finalize the critical analysis of each study by making appropriate revisions.
The completed analysis should connect to your identified practice problem of interest that is the basis for your PICOT question.
Refer to “Research Critiques and PICOT Guidelines – Final Draft.” Questions under each heading should be addressed as a narrative in the structure of a formal paper.
Proposed Evidence-Based Practice Change
Discuss the link between the PICOT question, the research articles, and the nursing practice problem you identified. Include relevant details and supporting explanation and use that information to propose evidence-based practice changes.
General Requirements
You are required to cite a minimum of three peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years, appropriate for the assignment criteria, and relevant to nursing practice.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
NRS 433 Revise the PICOT Question you Wrote in the Topic 1 Assignment Using the Feedback you Received from your Instructor
Attachments
NRS-433V-RS5-ResearchCritiquePICOTGuidelines.docxNRS-433V-RS5-Research-Critique-PICO
Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft – Rubric
Criteria Description
Evidence of Revision
5. 5: Excellent
26 points
Evidence of incorporation of research critique feedback and revision is comprehensive and thoroughly developed.
4. 4: Good
24.44 points
Evidence of incorporation of research critique feedback and revision is clearly provided.
3. 3: Satisfactory
21.58 points
Incorporation of research critique feedback and evidence of revision are present.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
19.5 points
Incorporation of research critique feedback or evidence of revision is incomplete.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Final paper does not demonstrate incorporation of feedback or evidence of revision on research critiques.
Criteria Description
Nursing Practice Problem and PICOT Question
5. 5: Excellent
13 points
PICOT question clearly articulates a nursing practice problem using substantial supporting information from numerous reliable sources.
4. 4: Good
12.22 points
PICOT question articulates a nursing practice problem using supporting information from reliable sources.
3. 3: Satisfactory
10.79 points
PICOT question describes a nursing practice problem and includes a few reliable sources.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
9.75 points
PICOT question describes a nursing practice problem but lacks reliable sources.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
A nursing practice problem is not clearly described or a PICOT question is not included.
Criteria Description
Background of Studies
5. 5: Excellent
13 points
Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
4. 4: Good
12.22 points
Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
3. 3: Satisfactory
10.79 points
Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
9.75 points
Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is incomplete.
Criteria Description
Method of Studies
5. 5: Excellent
13 points
Discussion of method of studies, including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
4. 4: Good
12.22 points
Discussion of method of studies, including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
3. 3: Satisfactory
10.79 points
Discussion of method of studies, including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework, is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
9.75 points
Discussion of method of studies, including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework, is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Discussion of method of studies, including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework, is incomplete.
Criteria Description
Results of Studies
5. 5: Excellent
13 points
Discussion of studies results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
4. 4: Good
12.22 points
Discussion of studies results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
3. 3: Satisfactory
10.79 points
Discussion of studies results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
9.75 points
Discussion of studies results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Discussion of studies results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is incomplete.
Criteria Description
Ethical Considerations
5. 5: Excellent
13 points
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
4. 4: Good
12.22 points
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
3. 3: Satisfactory
10.79 points
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
9.75 points
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is incomplete.
Criteria Description
Conclusion
5. 5: Excellent
13 points
Conclusion summarizes utility of the research from the critical appraisal, knowledge learned, and the importance of the findings to nursing practice.
4. 4: Good
12.22 points
Conclusion summarizes utility of the research from the critical appraisal and the importance of the findings to nursing practice.
3. 3: Satisfactory
10.79 points
Conclusion summarizes utility of the research and importance to nursing practice.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
9.75 points
Conclusion is vague and does not discuss importance to nursing.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Conclusion does not summarize a critical appraisal and applicability of findings.
Criteria Description
PICOT Question, Research Articles, and Nursing Practice Problem Relationship
5. 5: Excellent
26 points
Discussion of the relationship between the PICOT question, research articles, and nursing practice problem is extremely thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive supporting explanation.
4. 4: Good
24.44 points
Discussion of the relationship between the PICOT question, research articles, and nursing practice problem is complete and includes relevant details and supporting explanation.
3. 3: Satisfactory
21.58 points
Discussion of the relationship between the PICOT question, research articles, and nursing practice problem is included but lacks relevant details and supporting explanation.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
19.5 points
Discussion of the relationship between the PICOT question, research articles, and nursing practice problem is incomplete or incorrect.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Discussion of the relationship between the PICOT question, research articles, and nursing practice problem is not included.
Criteria Description
Proposed Evidence-Based Practice Change
5. 5: Excellent
26 points
The proposed evidence-based practice change is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting explanation and numerous relevant details.
4. 4: Good
24.44 points
The proposed evidence-based practice change is complete and includes supporting explanation and relevant details.
3. 3: Satisfactory
21.58 points
The proposed evidence-based practice change is included but lacks supporting explanation and relevant details.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
19.5 points
The proposed evidence-based practice change is incomplete or incorrect.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
The proposed evidence-based practice change is not included.
Criteria Description
Thesis Development and Purpose
5. 5: Excellent
26 points
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
4. 4: Good
24.44 points
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
3. 3: Satisfactory
21.58 points
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
19.5 points
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Criteria Description
Argument Logic and Construction
5. 5: Excellent
26 points
Argument is clear and convincing and presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
4. 4: Good
24.44 points
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
3. 3: Satisfactory
21.58 points
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
19.5 points
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Criteria Description
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
5. 5: Excellent
26 points
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
4. 4: Good
24.44 points
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.
3. 3: Satisfactory
21.58 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
19.5 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.
Criteria Description
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
5. 5: Excellent
13 points
All format elements are correct.
4. 4: Good
12.22 points
Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
3. 3: Satisfactory
10.79 points
Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
9.75 points
Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
Criteria Description
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
5. 5: Excellent
13 points
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
4. 4: Good
12.22 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
3. 3: Satisfactory
10.79 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
9.75 points
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Sources are not documented.
Total 260 points
Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations – Rubric
Rubric Criteria
Total 190 points
Criterion
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
3. 3: Satisfactory
4. 4: Good
5. 5: Excellent
Ethical Considerations
Ethical Considerations
0 points
Discussion of ethical considerations when conducting nursing research is incomplete. A discussion on ethical considerations of the two articles presented in the essay is incomplete.
21.38 points
Discussion of ethical considerations when conducting nursing research is included but lacks relevant details and explanation. A discussion on ethical considerations of the two articles used in the essay is summarized but there are significant inaccuracies or omissions.
23.65 points
Discussion of ethical considerations when conducting nursing research is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation. A discussion on ethical considerations of the two articles used in the essay is discussed but there are some inaccuracies, or some information is needed.
26.79 points
Discussion of ethical considerations when conducting nursing research is complete and includes relevant details and explanation. A discussion on ethical considerations of the two articles used in the essay is presented; some detail in needed for accuracy or clarity.
28.5 points
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation. A detailed discussion on ethical considerations of the two articles used in the essay is presented.
Results of Study
Results of Study
0 points
Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is incomplete.
21.38 points
A summary of the study results includes findings and implications for nursing practice but lacks relevant details and explanation. There are some omissions or inaccuracies.
23.65 points
Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is generally presented. Overall, the discussion includes some relevant details and explanation.
26.79 points
Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
28.5 points
Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
Article Support of Nursing Practice Issue
Article Support of Nursing Practice Issue
0 points
Discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is incomplete.
21.38 points
A summary of how articles support the PICOT question is presented. It is unclear how the articles can be used to answer the proposed PICOT question. Significant information and detail are required.
23.65 points
A general discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is presented. The articles demonstrate general support in answering the proposed PICOT question. It is unclear how the interventions and comparison groups in the articles compare to those identified in the PICOT question. Some rational or information is needed.
26.79 points
A discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is presented. The articles demonstrate support in answering the proposed PICOT question. The interventions and comparison groups in the articles compare to those identified in the PICOT question. Minor detail or rational is needed for clarity or support.
28.5 points
A clear discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is presented. The articles demonstrate strong support in answering the proposed PICOT question. The interventions and comparison groups in the articles strongly compare to those identified in the PICOT question.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
0 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.
7.13 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present.
7.89 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.
8.93 points
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.
9.5 points
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Thesis Development and Purpose
Thesis Development and Purpose
0 points
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
7.13 points
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.
7.89 points
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
8.93 points
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
9.5 points
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Documentation of Sources
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
0 points
Sources are not documented.
7.13 points
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
7.89 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
8.93 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
9.5 points
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Qualitative Studies
Qualitative Studies
0 points
Only one article is presented. Neither of the articles presented use qualitative research.
7.13 points
Two articles are presented. Of the articles presented, only one article is based on qualitative research.
7.89 points
N/A
8.93 points
N/A
9.5 points
Two articles are presented. Both articles are based on qualitative research.
Argument Logic and Construction
Argument Logic and Construction
0 points
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
7.13 points
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
7.89 points
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
8.93 points
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
9.5 points
Argument is clear and convincing and presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
Method of Study
Method of Study
0 points
Discussion on the method of study for each article is omitted. The comparison of study methods is omitted or incomplete.
21.38 points
A partial summary of the method of study for each article is presented. The comparison of study methods is incomplete. A benefit and a limitation of each method are omitted or incomplete. There are significant inaccuracies.
23.65 points
A general discussion on the method of study for each article is presented. The comparison of study methods is summarized. A benefit and a limitation of each method are summarized. There some inaccuracies or partial omissions. More information is needed.
26.79 points
A discussion on the method of study for each article is presented. The comparison of study methods is generally described. A benefit and a limitation of each method are presented. There minor are inaccuracies. Some detail is required for accuracy or clarity.
28.5 points
A thorough discussion on the method of study for each article is presented. The comparison of study methods is described in detail. A benefit and a limitation of each method are presented. The discussion demonstrates a solid understanding of research methods.
Background of Study
Background of Study
0 points
Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is incomplete.
14.25 points
Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
15.77 points
Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
17.86 points
Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
19 points
Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
0 points
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
7.13 points
Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.
7.89 points
Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
8.93 points
Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
9.5 points
All format elements are correct.