NRS 440 Discuss your Options in the Job Market Based on your Educational Level

NRS 440 Discuss your Options in the Job Market Based on your Educational Level
The IOM published report, “Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health,” makes recommendations for lifelong learning and achieving higher levels of education.
In 1,000-1,250 words, examine the importance of nursing education and discuss your overall educational goals.
Include the following:
Discuss your options in the job market based on your educational level.
Review the IOM Future of Nursing Recommendations for achieving higher levels of education. Describe what professional certification and advanced degrees (MSN, DNP, etc.) you want to pursue and explain your reasons for wanting to attain the education. Discuss your timeline for accomplishing these goals.
Discuss how increasing your level of education would affect how your competitiveness in the current job market and your role in the future of nursing.
Discuss the relationship of continuing nursing education to competency, attitudes, knowledge, and the ANA Scope and Standards for Practice and Code of Ethics.
Discuss whether continuing nursing education should be mandatory. Provide support for your response.
You are required to cite a minimum of three sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years, appropriate for the assignment criteria, and relevant to nursing practice.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
NRS 440 Discuss your Options in the Job Market Based on your Educational Level
Reflection Paper – Rubric
Criteria Description
Job Options Based on Educational Level
5. Excellent
12.5 points
Options in the job market based on educational level are thoroughly discussed. All options listed are realistic for educational level. The response demonstrates an awareness of job options based on educational level.
4. Good
11.13 points
Options in the job market based on educational level are discussed. Generally, options listed are realistic for educational level. The response demonstrates an awareness of job options based on educational level.
3. Satisfactory
9.88 points
Options in the job market based on educational level are summarized. Most options listed are realistic for educational level. The response demonstrates a general awareness of job options based on educational level.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
9.38 points
Options in the job market based on educational level are incomplete. Options listed are not realistic for educational level.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Options in the job market based on educational level are omitted.
Criteria Description
Goals for Professional Education
5. Excellent
18.75 points
Goals and timeline for professional certification and advanced degrees are thoroughly described. Clear and compelling reasons for wanting to attain the education are discussed.
4. Good
16.69 points
Goals and timeline for professional certification and advanced degrees are described overall.
3. Satisfactory
14.81 points
Goals and timeline for professional certification and advanced degrees are summarized. Reasons for wanting to attain the education are unclear.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
14.06 points
Goals and timeline for professional certification and advanced degrees are incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Goals and timeline for professional certification and advanced degrees are omitted.
Criteria Description
Increase in Level of Education and Effect on Competitiveness in Job Market and in Role in the Future of Nursing
5. Excellent
18.75 points
A well-developed discussion of how increasing level of education would affect competitiveness in current job market and personal role in the future of nursing is presented. The claims are substantiated and realistic for the current job market.
4. Good
16.69 points
Discussion of how increasing level of education would affect competitiveness in current job market and personal role in the future of nursing is presented. There are inaccuracies. Some support or rationale is needed.
3. Satisfactory
14.81 points
Goals and timeline for professional certification and advanced degrees are summarized. Reasons for wanting to attain the education are unclear.Overall, a general discussion of how increasing level of education would affect competitiveness in current job market and personal role in the future of nursing is presented. Some claims are not accurate or require further support or rationale.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
14.06 points
Summary of how increasing level of education would affect competitiveness in current job market and personal role in the future of nursing is presented but is incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Discussion of how increasing level of education would affect competitiveness in current job market and personal role in the future of nursing is omitted.
Criteria Description
Relationship of Continuing Nursing Education to Competency, Attitudes, Knowledge, and ANA Scope and Standards for Practice and Code of Ethics
5. Excellent
25 points
A well-supported discussion clearly establishing the relationship of continuing education in nursing to competency, attitudes, knowledge, and the ANA Scope and Standards for Practice and Code of Ethics is presented. The discussion demonstrates insight into the importance of education to the nursing profession.
4. Good
22.25 points
A discussion generally establishing the relationship of continuing education in nursing to competency, attitudes, knowledge, and the ANA Scope and Standards for Practice and Code of Ethics is presented. Some minor evidence or rationale is needed.
3. Satisfactory
19.75 points
A summary partially establishing the relationship of continuing education in nursing to competency, attitudes, knowledge, and the ANA Scope and Standards for Practice and Code of Ethics is presented. More evidence or rationale is needed.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
18.75 points
An incomplete discussion establishing the relationship of continuing education in nursing to competency, attitudes, knowledge, and the ANA Scope and Standards for Practice and Code of Ethics is presented. A relationship has not been established.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
A discussion establishing the relationship of continuing education in nursing to competency, attitudes, knowledge, and the ANA Scope and Standards for Practice and Code of Ethics is omitted.
Criteria Description
Criteria 5Mandatory Continuing Education Nursing
5. Excellent
25 points
A well-developed discussion of whether continuing nursing education should be mandatory is presented. Compelling rationale and evidence-based support for the argument is provided.
4. Good
22.25 points
A discussion of whether continuing nursing education should be mandatory is presented. Overall, rationale and evidence-based support for the argument is provided.
3. Satisfactory
19.75 points
A summary of whether continuing nursing education should be mandatory is presented. The summary lacks some rationale or evidence-based support for the argument.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
18.75 points
An incomplete summary of whether continuing nursing education should be mandatory is presented. The rationale and support for argument fail to support its claims.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
A discussion of whether continuing nursing education should be mandatory is omitted.
Criteria Description
Thesis Development and Purpose
5. Excellent
6.25 points
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
4. Good
5.56 points
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
3. Satisfactory
4.94 points
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
4.69 points
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Criteria Description
Argument Logic and Construction
5. Excellent
6.25 points
Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
4. Good
5.56 points
Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
3. Satisfactory
4.94 points
Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
4.69 points
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Criteria Description
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
5. Excellent
6.25 points
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
4. Good
5.56 points
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.
3. Satisfactory
4.94 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
4.69 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.
Criteria Description
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
5. Excellent
2.5 points
All format elements are correct.
4. Good
2.23 points
Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
3. Satisfactory
1.98 points
Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
1.88 points
Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
Criteria Description
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
5. Excellent
3.75 points
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
4. Good
3.34 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
3. Satisfactory
2.96 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
2.81 points
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Sources are not documented.
Total 125 points