NRS 451 Professionalism and Social Media GCU

NRS 451 Professionalism and Social Media GCU
Social media plays a significant role in the lives of nurses in both their professional and lives. Additionally, social media is now considered a mainstream part of the process for recruiting and hiring candidates. Inappropriate or unethical conduct on social media can create legal problems for nurses as well as the field of nursing.
Login to all sites in which you engage. Review your profile, pictures and posts. Based on the professional standards of nursing, identify items that would be considered unprofessional and potentially detrimental to your career and that negatively impact the reputation of the nursing field.
In 500-750 words, summarize the findings of your . Include the following:
Describe the posts or conversations in which you have engaged that might be considered inappropriate based on the professional standards of .
Discuss why nurses have a responsibility to uphold a standard of conduct consistent with the standards governing the profession of nursing at work and in their personal lives. Include discussion of how personal conduct can violate HIPAA or be considered unethical or unprofessional. Provide an example of each to support your answer.
Based on the analysis of your social media, discuss what areas of your social media activity reflect Christian values as they relate to respecting human value and dignity for all individuals. Describe areas of your social media activity that could be improved.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
NRS 451 Professionalism and Social Media GCU
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
Professionalism and Social Media
Nursing is among the professions where ethics must be observed at all times. It is a sensitive field where professionals must be cautious about treating others, connecting as professionals, and sharing information. Like other people, nurses are social media users. They usually use social media platforms to get informed about what is happening worldwide, socialize with colleagues and other people, and educate the masses on various health-related matters.
On a personal level, using social media is part of everyday life. However, as Edge (2017) mentioned, professionals, including nurses, may be unaware of their vulnerability online. In this case, they should be somewhat private about their political, social, and professional viewpoints, mainly if the information is sensitive. Nurses should be aware of privacy breaches and behave in a way that matches the generally expected nursing standards. When I reflect on what I post and the conversations I engage in, I think being open about American politics is inappropriate. When a nurse shows open bias regarding global or national political matters, a scenario where people close to him/her may feel apprehensive when seeking medical assistance from such nurses is inevitable. In the same case, I believe that posting about what we do and our locations contravene with the general expectations regarding how a nurse should behave. However, I believe that we learn and improve practice gradually, and I am not an exception.
Nurses are a reflection of what the nursing practice entails. They should behave in a way that makes patients and society at large confident in them. As a result, they should uphold a standard of conduct consistent with the nursing profession’s standards, at work and in their personal lives. The best way of upholding a standard of conduct is behaving as the general ethical guidelines of nursing recommend and ensure that their conduct does not violate HIPAA.
Typical personal conduct that can violate HIPAA is failing to observe the HIPAA Privacy Rule. This rule protects patients from privacy issues by obliging nurses not to disclose protected health information [PHI]. This category of information [HPI] includes texts about specific patients, images, or videos that could reveal a patient’s identity (HIPAA Journal, 2018). This implies that the only time when social media posts can contain patient data is when a patient has given consent. The consent should be in writing, and details to be revealed mentioned in the consent form.
Based on my social media, several areas of my activity reflect Christian values as they relate to respecting human values and dignity for all individuals. The first area is being empathetic with the populace’s suffering through illnesses and providing the masses with tips about healthy living. As lifestyles change, the ratio of people exposed to lifestyle diseases increases gradually. Due to its risk on public health, I share data that can help people change their way of living to reduce their vulnerability to illnesses.
Besides health tips, I share details of events and facilities dealing with specialty care to ensure that people have adequate information about where they can get help when facing various health challenges. When new medical research emerges, I am ready to share and discuss such information too. However, some areas need massive improvement. I think it is important to avoid gossip and unverified information. Also, details on accidents are somewhat sensitive and private. Since the goal is improving as we learn, I firmly believe that I will be better over time and use social media in the most professionally way possible. I am determined to do so.
References
Edge, W. (2017). Nursing professionalism: Impact of social media use among nursing students. Journal of Healthcare Communications, 2(3), 2472-1654. DOI:
HIPAA Journal. (2018, Mar 12). HIPAA Social Media Rules. https://www.hipaajournal.com/hipaa-social-media/
Review your state’s mandated reporter statute. Provide details about this in your post. If faced with a mandated reporter issue, what are the steps in reporting the issue? Create a mandated reporter scenario and post it. Respond to one of your peer’s scenarios using the guidelines for submission/reporting in your state. Be sure to include a reference to your state’s website related to mandated reporting.
Anyone who suspects that a kid is being abused or neglected in Texas is required by law to notify the proper authorities. Mandatory reporting is not restricted to teachers or personnel; it applies to everyone. Despite their confidential conversations, even lawyers, church members, and health care professionals are covered by the legislation. Consequently, all SMU personnel should be aware of Texas law regarding child abuse or neglect reporting. ”
Anyone who has regular contact with children, such as teachers, nurses, physicians, or daycare workers, is obligated to report suspected abuse or neglect within 48 hours, as does anyone else who is compelled to do so by law or who works for an organization or institution that is so designated. A child’s physical or mental health or welfare can be negatively affected by any activity that is defined broadly enough under Texas law to be potentially encompassed by the term “abuse” or “neglect.” An accident or reasonable discipline by a parent or guardian is explicitly excluded to avoid violating the law. If you’re not sure if anything is “abuse” or “neglect,” always err on the side of caution and file a police report. Call the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services (DFPS) if you suspect abuse or neglect of a child by someone accountable for the child’s well-being or who resides in the house where the kid is being cared for. Child Protective Services (CPS), a part of DFPS, is responsible for conducting civil investigations of suspected abuse or neglect by caregivers or household members. Reporting abuse or neglect to a local or state agency is another option. Government agencies are accountable for criminal cases, focusing on discovering who committed a crime. As a civil court case, the CPS inquiry is concerned with the well-being of the child and the family.
Reference
.
Resume and Cover Letter
Assessment Description
An applicant’s professional history and qualifications are outlined in a resume. A cover letter is a way for the applicant to make a professional introduction to the hiring manager and demonstrate an interest in the company.
Develop a current resume and create a formal cover letter for a position for which you would like to apply. Create both the cover letter and resume using a professionally accepted format provided on the Resume-Resources website, located in the topic Resources.
Include the following:
Resume: Detail your overall education, credentials, and professional experience, such as licenses, earned degrees, certifications, professional experiences, previous positions held, membership in professional organizations, publications, and skills.
Write a one-page double spaced introductory cover letter in which you explain your professional objectives, professional interests, and strengths as an applicant.
Prior to submission, share your resume with a colleague and obtain feedback. Revise your resume as needed
While APA style format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
Resources
Collapse All ResourcesCollapse All
Nursing Leadership and Management: Leading and Serving
Read Chapter 1 in Nursing Leadership and Management: Leading and Serving.
Resume Resource: Medical and Health Care
Review the Medical and Health Care page of the Resume-Resources website for examples of approved formats for use in the Topic 1 assignmen
… Read More
A Nurse’s Guide to the Use of Social Media
Read “A Nurse’s Guide to the Use of Social Media,” by the National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN) (2018), located on
… Read More
Nursing Professionalism: Impact of Social Media Use Among Nursing Students
Read “Nursing Professionalism: Impact of Social Media Use Among Nursing Students,” by Edge, from Journal of Healthcare Commun
… Read More
Code of Ethics for Nurse With Interpretive Statements
Read “Code of Ethics for Nurse With Interpretive Statements,” by the American Nurses Association (ANA) (2015), located on the ANA
… Read More
Jesus the CEO
Read “Jesus the CEO,” located on the Jesus Central website.
How Nurses Should be Using Social Media
Read “How Nurses Should be Using Social Media,” by #EveryNurse (2018), located on the #EveryNurse blogsite.
The Wisdom of Jesus and Societal Crisis
Read “The Wisdom of Jesus and Societal Crisis,” by Gary (2004), located on the Christian Futures Network website.
Social Media
Read “Social Media,” located on the American Nurses Association website.
Professionalism and Social Media – Rubric
Collapse All Professionalism And Social Media – RubricCollapse All
Assessment of Social Media Identifying Unprofessional Items
14.8 points
Criteria Description
Assessment of Social Media Identifying Unprofessional Items
5. Excellent
14.8 points
A detailed and transparent analysis of the appropriateness of social media activity based on standards of nursing practice is presented.
4. Good
13.17 points
An analysis of the appropriateness of social media activity based on standards of nursing practice is presented.
3. Satisfactory
11.69 points
A general analysis of the appropriateness of social media activity based on standards of nursing practice is presented but is unclear in some areas.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
11.1 points
A partial analysis of the appropriateness of social media activity, based on standards of nursing practice, is not clear; or the analysis fails to incorporate the standards of nursing practice appropriately.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Analysis of the appropriateness of social media activity, based on professional standards of nursing, is omitted.
Nurse Responsibility to Uphold a Standard of Conduct
29.6 points
Criteria Description
Nurse Responsibility to Uphold a Standard of Conduct Consistent With Nursing Profession in Personal Life
5. Excellent
29.6 points
The discussion demonstrates an overall understanding of the importance of professional conduct in personal behavior and its implications for patients and the field of nursing. The discussion explains how personal conduct can violate HIPAA or be considered unethical or unprofessional. Clear examples are given.
4. Good
26.34 points
The analysis and discussion demonstrate an overall understanding of the importance of professional conduct in personal behavior and its implications for patients and the field of nursing. The discussion summarizes how personal conduct can violate HIPAA or be considered unethical or unprofessional. General examples are given.
3. Satisfactory
23.38 points
A more in-depth discussion on the appropriateness of social media activity based on nursing standards is needed. The discussion demonstrates a broad understanding of the importance of professional conduct in personal behavior and the consequence for inappropriate behavior causing harm.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
22.2 points
The discussion fails to demonstrate an understanding of the importance of professional conduct in personal behavior and its consequence for causing harm to patients, nursing practice, or personal employment.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Discussion of how personal conduct can violate HIPAA, or be considered unethical or unprofessional as a nurse, is omitted.
Human Value and Dignity for Others Consistent with a Christian Worldview (MC3
14.8 points
Criteria Description
Human Value and Dignity for Others Consistent with a Christian Worldview (MC3
5. Excellent
14.8 points
A discussion of areas of social media activity that reflect Christian values as they relate to respecting human value and dignity is presented. The discussion demonstrates inclusiveness by respecting human value and dignity for all individuals regardless of differences. Specific areas for improvement have been suggested. The discussion is honest and demonstrates accountability for personal actions.
4. Good
13.17 points
A discussion on areas of social media activity that reflect Christian values as they relate to respecting human value and dignity is presented. In general, the discussion demonstrates inclusiveness by respecting human value and dignity for different groups. General areas for improvement have been suggested.
3. Satisfactory
11.69 points
A general discussion on areas of social media activity that reflect Christian values as they relate to respecting human value and dignity is presented. Some areas for improvement have been suggested.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
11.1 points
An incomplete discussion on areas of social media activity that reflect Christian values as they relate to respecting human value and dignity is presented. No areas for improvement have been clearly suggested.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Discussion on areas of social media activity that reflect Christian values as they relate to respecting human value and dignity for all individuals is omitted.
Thesis Development and Purpose
3.7 points
Criteria Description
Thesis Development and Purpose
5. Excellent
3.7 points
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
4. Good
3.29 points
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
3. Satisfactory
2.92 points
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
2.78 points
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Argument Logic and Construction
3.7 points
Criteria Description
Argument Logic and Construction
5. Excellent
3.7 points
Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
4. Good
3.29 points
Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
3. Satisfactory
2.92 points
Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
2.78 points
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
3.7 points
Criteria Description
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
5. Excellent
3.7 points
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
4. Good
3.29 points
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
3. Satisfactory
2.92 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
2.78 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
1.48 points
Criteria Description
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
5. Excellent
1.48 points
All format elements are correct.
4. Good
1.32 points
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
3. Satisfactory
1.17 points
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
1.11 points
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
Documentation of Sources
2.22 points
Criteria Description
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
5. Excellent
2.22 points
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
4. Good
1.98 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
3. Satisfactory
1.75 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
1.67 points
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Sources are not documented.
Total 74 points
Professionalism and Social Media – Rubric
Rubric Criteria
Total 74 points
Criterion
1. Unsatisfactory
2. Less Than Satisfactory
3. Satisfactory
4. Good
5. Excellent
Assessment of Social Media Identifying Unprofessional Items
Assessment of Social Media Identifying Unprofessional Items
0 points
Analysis of the appropriateness of social media activity, based on professional standards of nursing, is omitted.
11.1 points
A partial analysis of the appropriateness of social media activity, based on standards of nursing practice, is not clear; or the analysis fails to incorporate the standards of nursing practice appropriately.
11.69 points
A general analysis of the appropriateness of social media activity based on standards of nursing practice is presented but is unclear in some areas.
13.17 points
An analysis of the appropriateness of social media activity based on standards of nursing practice is presented.
14.8 points
A detailed and transparent analysis of the appropriateness of social media activity based on standards of nursing practice is presented.
Documentation of Sources
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
0 points
Sources are not documented.
1.67 points
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
1.75 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
1.98 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
2.22 points
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
0 points
Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
1.11 points
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.
1.17 points
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
1.32 points
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
1.48 points
All format elements are correct.
Nurse Responsibility to Uphold a Standard of Conduct
Nurse Responsibility to Uphold a Standard of Conduct Consistent With Nursing Profession in Personal Life
0 points
Discussion of how personal conduct can violate HIPAA, or be considered unethical or unprofessional as a nurse, is omitted.
22.2 points
The discussion fails to demonstrate an understanding of the importance of professional conduct in personal behavior and its consequence for causing harm to patients, nursing practice, or personal employment.
23.38 points
A more in-depth discussion on the appropriateness of social media activity based on nursing standards is needed. The discussion demonstrates a broad understanding of the importance of professional conduct in personal behavior and the consequence for inappropriate behavior causing harm.
26.34 points
The analysis and discussion demonstrate an overall understanding of the importance of professional conduct in personal behavior and its implications for patients and the field of nursing. The discussion summarizes how personal conduct can violate HIPAA or be considered unethical or unprofessional. General examples are given.
29.6 points
The discussion demonstrates an overall understanding of the importance of professional conduct in personal behavior and its implications for patients and the field of nursing. The discussion explains how personal conduct can violate HIPAA or be considered unethical or unprofessional. Clear examples are given.
Thesis Development and Purpose
Thesis Development and Purpose
0 points
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
2.78 points
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.
2.92 points
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
3.29 points
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
3.7 points
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
0 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.
2.78 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
2.92 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
3.29 points
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
3.7 points
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Human Value and Dignity for Others Consistent with a Christian Worldview (MC3
Human Value and Dignity for Others Consistent with a Christian Worldview (MC3
0 points
Discussion on areas of social media activity that reflect Christian values as they relate to respecting human value and dignity for all individuals is omitted.
11.1 points
An incomplete discussion on areas of social media activity that reflect Christian values as they relate to respecting human value and dignity is presented. No areas for improvement have been clearly suggested.
11.69 points
A general discussion on areas of social media activity that reflect Christian values as they relate to respecting human value and dignity is presented. Some areas for improvement have been suggested.
13.17 points
A discussion on areas of social media activity that reflect Christian values as they relate to respecting human value and dignity is presented. In general, the discussion demonstrates inclusiveness by respecting human value and dignity for different groups. General areas for improvement have been suggested.
14.8 points
A discussion of areas of social media activity that reflect Christian values as they relate to respecting human value and dignity is presented. The discussion demonstrates inclusiveness by respecting human value and dignity for all individuals regardless of differences. Specific areas for improvement have been suggested. The discussion is honest and demonstrates accountability for personal actions.
Argument Logic and Construction
Argument Logic and Construction
0 points
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
2.78 points
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
2.92 points
Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
3.29 points
Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
3.7 points
Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.