NURS 8502 Blog: Defining and Refining the Problem

NURS 8502 Blog: Defining and Refining the Problem
You have now spent 3 full weeks working on an identified practice problem. You have spent time with your team and preceptor at your practicum site, and you have begun to evaluate the scope of the problem and need for change. Based on your experiences in these first 4 weeks, what is working? What is not working? What has or has not worked in the past?
Photo Credit: WavebreakmediaMicro – stock.adob
For this Discussion, you will consider your identified practice problem to help define and refine the work that you have done thus far. Consider what is working, what is not working, your stakeholders, and what has worked and has not worked in the past. Review the evidence gathered to determine how you might need to refine your identified practice problem.
To Prepare
Review the Learning Resources that address problem identification.
Analyze the work done thus far on your identified practice problem, specifically analyzing what management has done to date with the problem.
Review your practice focused question, meetings with your team and preceptor, and your identification of stakeholders.
By Day 3 of Week 4
Post a response discussing your selected practice problem. After meeting with your team, describe the following:
NURS 8502 Blog: Defining and Refining the Problem
What is currently working?
What has not worked?
What changes might you implement?
What changes might you consider in addressing the problem?
Are these changes supported by evidence?
In your response, share what you have been working on throughout the first 4 weeks of the course, focusing specifically on defining your practice focused question, meeting with your team, and identifying stakeholders. Be specific. What leadership strategies might you use to support the problem you have identified? Explain whether you have refined your practice focused question and why.
By Day 6 of Week 4
Read a selection of your colleagues’ blog posts and respond to at least two of your colleagues on two different days by supporting or expanding on their work thus far with their practice focused question. Work to share additional perspectives on the issue described by your colleague.
Submission and Grading Information
Grading Criteria
To access your rubric:
Week 4 Blog Rubric
Post by Day 3 of Week 4 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 4
To Participate in this Blog:
Week 4 Blog
NURS_8502_Week4_Blog_Rubric
Grid View
List View
Excellent
90–100
Good
80–89
Fair
70–79
Poor
0–69
Main Posting:
Response to the Blog prompt is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
Points Range: 54 (54%) – 60 (60%)
Thoroughly responds to the Blog prompt(s).
Is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and/or current practice experiences.
No less than 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.
Points Range: 48 (48%) – 53 (53%)
Responds to most of the Blog prompt(s).
Is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and/or current practice experiences.
50% of the post has exceptional depth and breadth.
Points Range: 42 (42%) – 46 (46%)
Responds to some of the Blog prompt(s).
One to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.
Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.
Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 41 (41%)
Does not respond to the Blog prompt(s).
Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.
Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.
Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
Main Posting:
Writing
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Written clearly and concisely.
Contains no grammatical or spelling errors.
Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Written concisely.
May contain one to two grammatical or spelling errors.
Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.
Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Written somewhat concisely.
May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.
Contains some APA formatting errors.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Not written clearly or concisely.
Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.
Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.
Main Posting:
Timely and full participation
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.
Posts main Blog post by due date.
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Posts main Discussion by due date.
Meets requirements for full participation.
Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Posts main Blog post by due date.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Does not meet requirements for full participation.
Does not post main Blog post by due date.
First Response:
Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective.
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Responds to questions posed by faculty.
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.
Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
First Response:
Writing
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Response fully answers faculty questions, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues.
Response mostly answers faculty questions, if posed.
Provides opinions and ideas.
Response is written in standard, edited English.
Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Response posed in the Blog may lack effective professional communication.
Response somewhat answers faculty questions, if posed.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Responses posted in the Blog lack effective communication.
Response to faculty questions is missing.
First Response:
Timely and full participation
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.
Posts by due date.
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Meets requirements for full participation.
Posts by due date.
Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Posts by due date.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Does not meet requirements for full participation.
Does not post by due date.
Second Response:
Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective.
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Responds to questions posed by faculty.
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.
Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
Second Response:
Writing
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Response fully answers faculty questions, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues.
Response mostly answers faculty questions, if posed.
Provides opinions and ideas.
Response is written in standard, edited English.
Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Response posed in the Blog may lack effective professional communication.
Response somewhat answers faculty questions, if posed.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Responses posted in the Blog lack effective communication.
Response to faculty questions is missing.
Second Response:
Timely and full participation
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.
Posts by due date.
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Meets requirements for full participation.
Posts by due date.
Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Posts by due date.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Does not meet requirements for full participation.
Does not post by due date.
Total Points: 100
Name: NURS_8502_Week4_Blog_Rubric

Struggling to find relevant content or pressed for time? – Don’t worry, we have a team of professionals to help you on
NURS 8502 Blog: Defining and Refining the Problem
Get a 15% Discount on this Paper
Order Now
Calculate the price
Make an order in advance and get the best price
Pages (550 words)
$0.00
*Price with a welcome 15% discount applied.
Pro tip: If you want to save more money and pay the lowest price, you need to set a more extended deadline.
We know how difficult it is to be a student these days. That's why our prices are one of the most affordable on the market, and there are no hidden fees.

Instead, we offer bonuses, discounts, and free services to make your experience outstanding.
Sign up, place your order, and leave the rest to our professional paper writers in less than 2 minutes.
step 1
Upload assignment instructions
Fill out the order form and provide paper details. You can even attach screenshots or add additional instructions later. If something is not clear or missing, the writer will contact you for clarification.
s
Get personalized services with MyCoursebay
One writer for all your papers
You can select one writer for all your papers. This option enhances the consistency in the quality of your assignments. Select your preferred writer from the list of writers who have handledf your previous assignments
Same paper from different writers
Are you ordering the same assignment for a friend? You can get the same paper from different writers. The goal is to produce 100% unique and original papers
Copy of sources used
Our homework writers will provide you with copies of sources used on your request. Just add the option when plaing your order
What our partners say about us
We appreciate every review and are always looking for ways to grow. See what other students think about our do my paper service.
Statistics
Thank you so much. This looks amazing!!!
Customer 453011, May 27th, 2024
Philosophy
i got the paper a bit late but it is good quality will for sure come back and use this website.
Customer 452611, September 9th, 2021
Nursing
Thanks
Customer 452521, May 13th, 2021
Nursing
Words can't describe how helpful this service has been for me. Thank you!
Customer 452707, January 9th, 2023
Business and administrative studies
GOOD
Customer 452813, June 30th, 2022
Other
Excellent work, delivered ahead of schedule
Customer 452467, January 19th, 2024
Human Resources Management (HRM)
Thank you so much.
Customer 452701, October 11th, 2023
Other
AWESOME
Customer 452813, June 30th, 2022
Human Resources Management (HRM)
Thank you very much.
Customer 452701, September 10th, 2023
Web programming
thank you so much. This was very helpful and I was able to understand the assignment better after seeing it completed.
Customer 452715, September 22nd, 2022
Social Work and Human Services
Excellent Work!
Customer 452587, November 30th, 2021
IT, Web
Paper was great and accomplished everything I needed.
Customer 452885, October 27th, 2022
OUR GIFT TO YOU
15% OFF your first order
Use a coupon FIRST15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Claim my 15% OFF Order in Chat

Good News ! We now help with PROCTORED EXAM. Chat with a support agent for more information

NEW

Thank you for choosing MyCoursebay. Your presence is a motivation to us. All papers are written from scratch. Plagiarism is not tolerated. Order now for a 15% discount

Order Now