PSYC 300 AMU Wk 3 Public Attitudes Towards the Severely Mentally Ill Discussion Essay

PSYC 300 AMU Wk 3 Public Attitudes Towards the Severely Mentally Ill Discussion PSYC 300 AMU Wk 3 Public Attitudes Towards the Severely Mentally Ill Discussion Essay ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL NURSING PAPERS Home > Humanities > PSYC 300 AMU Wk 3 Public Attitudes Towards the Severely Mentally Ill Discussion Question Description I don’t know how to handle this Psychology question and need guidance. https://saylordotorg.github.io/text_research-methods-in-psychology/s05-the-science-of-psychology.html In this class you will complete a Research Study Proposal to investigate a social-psychological issue to allow you to put into practice what you have learned throughout this course by designing a hypothetical research study proposal. The Research Study Proposal will be divided into two assignments: Research Study Proposal Part I and l Research Study Proposal Part II. The topic of your research study should be on a social-psychological issue. Social Psychology focuses on the impact of social environments on individuals or groups. Two examples of social psychology focused studies are: A study that researches the impact of public awareness ad campaigns on public attitudes toward the severely mentally ill. A study comparing types of school administrator responses to reports of bullying and victims’ willingness to report instances of bullying to their parents. The Research Study Proposal Part I must include the four components below. You will use these components as subheadings for four sections in your paper 1. Proposed Topic: Describe the study’s topic and focus (1 page minimum) 2. Hypothesis (can be in a form of question or stating the Ho and Ha) 3. Participants. Describe participant demographics (race, gender, age, religion, SES, area of the country in which they live, etc.), the process for selecting/recruiting them, and the rationale for selecting them (1/2 page minimum) 4. Sampling Method: Discuss the proposed sampling method and the rational for selecting it (1 page minimum) Your paper must also: Be a minimum of 3 and a maximum of 4 full pages, size 12 font, Times New Roman, double spaced with 1 inch margins, NOT including the Title and References pages. Be in APA format, including a title page and reference page. Be proofread and contain few to no grammar errors, misspellings, incorrect APA formatting, or typographical errors. Incorporate a minimum of three supportive scholarly citations and references to support content and conclusions. PSYC 300 AMU Wk 3 Public Attitudes Towards the Severely Mentally Ill Discussion Essay Sources https://saylordotorg.github.io/text_research-methods-in-psychology/s10-experimental-research.html https://saylordotorg.github.io/text_research-methods-in-psychology/s11-nonexperimental-research.html https://saylordotorg.github.io/text_research-methods-in-psychology/s05-the-science-of-psychology.html https://saylordotorg.github.io/text_research-methods-in-psychology/s06-getting-started-in-research.html Outside resources can be used. The attached document is a study proposal example. Unformatted Attachment Preview Running head: RANK AND CITATION BIAS 1 Perceived Social Status of Military Rank and Influence on Citation Bias in the Airman and NCO Tiers of Security Forces Student Name 26 August, 2017 Professor RANK AND CITATION BIAS 2 Perceived Social Status of Military Rank and Influence on Citation Bias in the Airman and NCO Tiers of Security Forces Proposed Topic How does the perceived social status of military rank influence citation bias in the Airman and NCO tiers of Security Forces members at Cheyenne Mountain Air Force Station, Peterson Air Force Base, Schriever Air Force Base and the Air Force Academy? Social status among military members is arguably one of the most important aspects of military heritage. Instilled from day one at basic training, recruits are taught to be respectful, listen to orders and act in a dignified manner. In technical training, Security Forces members are taught about law enforcement, base security and combat tactics. Maintaining objectivity during traffic stops and security enforcement is paramount to operations. What happens when social status and law enforcement meet? How does a person’s rank affect persuasive measures, instructions or citations used by Security Forces? In the military there is a great sense of rank structure. Humans rely heavily on social hierarchies to determine their behavior, as well social status may affect motivation and wellbeing in humans (Zink et al., 2008, p. 273). When two ideas of social responsibility are challenged it can create cognitive dissonance. Those that are higher ranking are expected to be respected and treated differently than those that are lower ranking. In Security Forces low ranking individuals often enforce rules and laws on military instillations. Within the career field itself members are expected to have higher standards and hold themselves above reproach. What happens when a low ranking Security Forces member comes in contact with a high ranking member and must provide enforcement? Will the Security Forces member be affected by the perception of authority as to the severity of the citation? Will the Security Forces member operate objectively and enforce equally? Would the Security Forces RANK AND CITATION BIAS 3 member issue the same citation for the same infraction that was caused by two members of different rank? In examining these questions the fairness of citation issuing will be determined. Social status in humans can effect physiological changes and hormone levels as well as behaviors of fairness and differences in social interactions, in the military social status is easily seen in the rank structure (Siart, Pflüger, & Wallner, 2016, p. 1). This study will look into the effects of perceived social status (rank) on citation bias among Security Forces members in the local Colorado Springs area. Hypotheses H0: Individuals in the Airman tier will display more bias in their citations than those individuals in the NCO tier. Ha: There will be no observable difference in bias between the Airman and NCO tiers. During this study there should be several observations made. First there should be direct correlation between lower ranking Security Forces members and the lesser severity of traffic citation given to higher ranking individuals. This result should be caused by the lack of experience and perceived authority of the higher ranking individuals. Additionally as the rank of a Security Forces member increases the bias should decrease. This should be the result of increased experience as well as decreased effects of perceived status on their decision making process. PSYC 300 AMU Wk 3 Public Attitudes Towards the Severely Mentally Ill Discussion Essay Rank is an independent variable in this study, while citation severity is the dependent variable. The controlled variable or constant will be the infraction (e.g. speed infraction of five miles per hour over the speed limit). The severity of the citation should depend on the violators rank. Participants RANK AND CITATION BIAS 4 Participants will be selected from Colorado Springs area military bases. Due to the variety of military personnel in terms of race, gender and age no specific demographic in this area would be selected. Rather two groups of Security Forces would be chosen. The first group in the Airman tier (Airman Basic through Senior Airman) and the Non Commissioned Officer (NCO) tier (Staff Sargent through Technical Sergeant). Due to the Senior Non Commissioned Officer (SNCO) tier being at the upper portion of the enlisted rank structure this tier will not be selected. Race, gender and age will vary among the participants. General racial statistics can offer some insight into what potential races will participate based on overall Air Force statistics. Approximately 70% of the participants can be expected to be white, 14% Black or African American, 3.8% Asian and the remainder American Indian, Hawaiian, or mixed race (Air Force Personnel Center, 2017). Average age of participants according the Air Force wide demographics will be averaging 28 years old with the majority being blow 26 years old due to lower tiers having younger individuals present. Finally, based on gender statistics approximately 19.7% of the participants will be women with the remaining 80.3% being men (Air Force Personnel Center, 2017). These statistics reflect overall Air Force Enlisted numbers and should be taken as approximate representations of Security Forces specific demographic numbers at the target locations of Peterson Air Force Base, Schriever Air Force Base, Cheyenne Mountain Air Force Station and the Air Force Academy. The process for selection will be volunteer based opportunity for involvement disseminated from leadership elements to ensure maximum amount of personnel have the opportunity for involvement. The target participants will be at least twenty five personnel in the Airman tier and twenty five in the NCO tier. The reason behind selecting these specific tiers is that these are the personnel making most contact with the public and RANK AND CITATION BIAS 5 performing law enforcement duties. PSYC 300 AMU Wk 3 Public Attitudes Towards the Severely Mentally Ill Discussion Essay. Those in the SNCO tier are not the primary law enforcers on military installations. Sampling Method A Stratified Random Sampling method will be used to identify the two groups of the Airman and NCO tiers. The purpose of this project is to gain perception on a specific sample and later apply it to the overall Security Forces population. The sample chosen will only be from the bases in the Colorado Springs area. Because there are four bases this will provide an adequate number of individuals to participate. Determining how the sample population responds to the stimulus throughout the project will provide insight into how the overall population will react, also this will explain several aspects of the overall population (Leedy & Ormrod, 2016, p. 159). Though the information may be useful in determining trends within the overall population, the study will be limited to one geographical region. Provided every member in the local area is notified of the opportunity this will give the sample population equal opportunity for participation. An easy method to ensure this would be email notification followed up by personal contact with potential participants. The target number of total participants is fifty, with twenty five in the Airman tier and twenty five in the NCO tier. These two groups will identify the strata within the research study. Depending on the number of respondents these numbers can be adjusted, however equal numbers in each tier will be important in determining differences between the two groups when it comes to bias. From the respondents an equal number of each will be taken for the research study. Additionally, an equal number of the separate ranks can be taken to further study the possible change of bias as ones rank increases. One benefits for this type of study would be a decreased estimation error as may be present in a simple random sampling (The Pennsylvania State University, 2017). Though these samples are not a RANK AND CITATION BIAS 6 representation of the overall Air Force population in terms of rank proportion, the purpose of the study is to collect information that is not dependent on relation to overall population. Other methods of sampling may not be as useful. It is important in this study to have an equal number of each rank tier, the tiers are the stratified populations within the study. RANK AND CITATION BIAS 7 References Air Force Personnel Center. (2017, June 30). Air Force demographics. Retrieved from http://www.afpc.af.mil/Air-Force-Demographics/ Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2016). Practical research: Planning and design [Vitalsource Bookshelf edition]. Retrieved from https://www.vitalsource.com Pennsylvania State University. (2017). STAT506: 6.1 How to use stratified sampling. Retrieved from https://onlinecourses.science.psu.edu/stat506/node/27 Siart, B., Pflüger, L. S., & Wallner, B. (2016). Corrigendum: Pulling rank: Military rank affects hormone levels and fairness in an allocation experiment. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(1750). http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00955 Zink, C. F., Tong, Y., Chen, Q., Bassett, D. S., Stein, J. L., & Meyer-Lindenberg, A. (2008). Know your place: Neural processing of social hierarchy in humans. Neuron, 58(2), 273283. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2008.01.025 … Purchase answer to see full attachment. PSYC 300 AMU Wk 3 Public Attitudes Towards the Severely Mentally Ill Discussion Essay Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10

Struggling to find relevant content or pressed for time? – Don’t worry, we have a team of professionals to help you on
PSYC 300 AMU Wk 3 Public Attitudes Towards the Severely Mentally Ill Discussion Essay
Get a 15% Discount on this Paper
Order Now
Calculate the price
Make an order in advance and get the best price
Pages (550 words)
$0.00
*Price with a welcome 15% discount applied.
Pro tip: If you want to save more money and pay the lowest price, you need to set a more extended deadline.
We know how difficult it is to be a student these days. That's why our prices are one of the most affordable on the market, and there are no hidden fees.

Instead, we offer bonuses, discounts, and free services to make your experience outstanding.
Sign up, place your order, and leave the rest to our professional paper writers in less than 2 minutes.
step 1
Upload assignment instructions
Fill out the order form and provide paper details. You can even attach screenshots or add additional instructions later. If something is not clear or missing, the writer will contact you for clarification.
s
Get personalized services with MyCoursebay
One writer for all your papers
You can select one writer for all your papers. This option enhances the consistency in the quality of your assignments. Select your preferred writer from the list of writers who have handledf your previous assignments
Same paper from different writers
Are you ordering the same assignment for a friend? You can get the same paper from different writers. The goal is to produce 100% unique and original papers
Copy of sources used
Our homework writers will provide you with copies of sources used on your request. Just add the option when plaing your order
What our partners say about us
We appreciate every review and are always looking for ways to grow. See what other students think about our do my paper service.
Nursing
Excellent PowerPoint! Thank you!
Customer 452707, June 29th, 2022
Nursing
Thank you!
Customer 452707, April 3rd, 2022
IT, Web
Did an excellent job with the body of the paper and staying on the topic.
Customer 452885, October 27th, 2022
Business and administrative studies
GOOD
Customer 452813, June 30th, 2022
Other
good
Customer 452813, June 30th, 2022
Classic English Literature
Nicely done. Ty. Worth every penny.
Customer 452455, June 6th, 2021
Other
Awesome Work!
Customer 452587, February 24th, 2022
Other
great
Customer 452813, June 30th, 2022
Criminal Justice
Great work! Followed directions to the latter.
Customer 452485, September 1st, 2021
Psychology
Thanks so very much. The paper is well-researched and adequately referenced. You have been of great help during the pandemic!
Customer 452467, January 31st, 2021
Social Work and Human Services
Excellent Work!
Customer 452587, September 16th, 2021
Other
AWESOME
Customer 452813, June 25th, 2022
OUR GIFT TO YOU
15% OFF your first order
Use a coupon FIRST15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Claim my 15% OFF Order in Chat

Get top-notch homework help now. 20% off first 10 orders!

NEW

Thank you for choosing MyCoursebay. Your presence is a motivation to us. All papers are written from scratch. Plagiarism is not tolerated. Order now for a 15% discount

Order Now