Table of Contents
Psychoanalytical Theories and Attachment Theory
Psychoanalytical Theories and Attachment Theory
Psychodynamic and its derivatives can be traced to the father of psychoanalysis, Sigmund Freud. You likely are familiar with the image that often conjures Freud: A client lying on a couch with a therapist sitting nearby, notepad in hand. The psychoanalytic terms “id,” “ego,” “superego,” “repression,” and “unconscious” are deeply embedded in the layperson’s jargon.
Many have sprung from Freud’s psychoanalytical principles. Attachment is one example. Its originator, John Bowlby, was directly influenced by Freud, but because of Bowlby’s experiences in working with disturbed children, he believed that a child’s psychosocial development is linked to their attachment to the mother. Because all must be tested using empirical research methods, Mary Ainsworth tested John Bowlby’s theory using the Strange Situation experiment, which involved observing children react to caregivers and strangers. The results from her research led to what we now know as attachment styles.
This week, you switch your lenses to consider a case study through these .
Learning Objectives
Students will:
- Summarize the assumptions of psychoanalytical and attachment
- Evaluate the strengths and limitations of psychoanalytical and attachment
- Develop reflection questions to apply attachment in social work practice
- Apply attachment to a social work case study
Photo Credit: [Tom Merton]/[OJO Images]/Getty Images
Learning Resources
Note: To access this week’s required library resources, please click on the link to the Course Readings List, found in the Course Materials section of your Syllabus.
Required Readings
Turner, F. J. (Ed.). (2017). Social work treatment: Interlocking theoretical approaches (6th ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Chapter 1: Attachment and Social Work Treatment (pp. 1–22)
Chapter 25: The Psychoanalytic of Ideas (pp. 398–410)
Foley, M., Nash, M., & Munford, R. (2009). Bringing practice into theory: Reflective practice and attachment theory. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work Review, 21(1/2), p39–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol21iss1-2id318
