Im working on a Political Science question and need guidance to help me study.
Struggling to find relevant content or pressed for time? – Don’t worry, we have a team of professionals to help you on
[SOLVED] Examine a developing country’s political history and current barriers in developing their democracy. Create a concise argument on the type of democracy they should institute and why.
Get a 15% Discount on this Paper
Required Resources
Read/review the following resources for this activity:
- Textbook: Magstadt, T. M. (2017). Understanding politics: Ideas, institutions, and issues. Australia: Cengage Learning. Chapter 7, 8, 9
- type in book title, then google books, once you click the link, go the search bar and search the chapters as needed. make sure to use book in paper AND 2 scholarly sources.
- Lesson
- Minimum of 2 scholarly sources
Instructions
Many countries have gone through various ways of governing-by one, by a group, or by the people. Pick one developing country. Examine this country’s political history and current barriers in developing their democracy. Create a concise argument on the type of democracy they should institute and why.
Use the following list to select your developing country: https://www.usaid.gov/sites/default/files/documents/1876/310mab.pdf (Links to an external site.)
Writing Requirements (APA format)
- Length: 1.5-2 pages (not including title page or references page)
- 1-inch margins
- Double spaced
- 12-point Times New Roman font
- Title page
- References page (minimum of 2 scholarly sources)
Grading
This activity will be graded based on the essay rubric.
Course Outcomes (CO): 2, 5
Due Date: By 11:59 p.m. MT on Sunday
Week 3 Assignment: Essay – Developing a Democracy
| Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCountry and history examined
|
| 20.0 pts
In-depth analysis of the country and the countrys political history.
|
16.0 pts
Analysis of the country and the countrys political history lacked depth.
|
12.0 pts
Analysis of the country or a presentation of the country’s political history not present.
|
0.0 pts
Country and political history are not discussed.
|
|
20.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBarriers: nation-building, state building, participation, and distribution.
|
| 20.0 pts
Addresses each concept related to barriers. Examples are from the country chosen for examination.
|
16.0 pts
Addresses at least two out of the three concepts. Doesnt relate these concepts back country.
|
12.0 pts
Addresses only one of the concepts. Does not relate these concepts to the country.
|
0.0 pts
Does not address any concepts.
|
|
20.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis
|
| 20.0 pts
Constructed a concise argument using a key democratic ideology for their country.
|
16.0 pts
The democratic ideology is clear but it does not relate back to their country.
|
12.0 pts
It is unclear what democratic ideology is being used and it does not relate back to their country.
|
0.0 pts
Does not address democratic ideology.
|
|
20.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScholarly resources
|
| 10.0 pts
Uses both the book and, at least, one outside scholarly source.
|
8.0 pts
Uses only the book or a scholarly source.
|
6.0 pts
The outside source used is not scholarly.
|
0.0 pts
Does not use the book or scholarly source.
|
|
10.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA
|
| 5.0 pts
All sources are properly cited and referenced according to APA standards.
|
4.0 pts
Sources are either properly cited or referenced, missing one of those elements.
|
3.0 pts
The citation and/or reference are incorrect.
|
0.0 pts
No APA format was used.
|
|
5.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting
|
| 5.0 pts
Presents information using clear and concise language in an organized manner (minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).
|
4.0 pts
Presents information using understandable language but is somewhat disorganized (some errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).
|
3.0 pts
Presents information using understandable language but is very disorganized (many errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).
|
0.0 pts
Presents information that is not clear, logical, professional or organized to the point that the reader has difficulty understanding the message (numerous errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and/or punctuation).
|
|
5.0 pts
|
|
Total Points: 80.0
|
