Can you help me understand this Health & Medical question?
Struggling to find relevant content or pressed for time? – Don’t worry, we have a team of professionals to help you on
[SOLVED] Unit 2 week 2 402
Get a 15% Discount on this Paper
Unit 2 Assignment – SWOT Analysis
Submit Assignment
- Due Sunday by 11:59pm
- Points 90
- Submitting a text entry box or a file upload
Estimated time to complete: 2 hours
Instructions
The purpose of the Assignment for this unit is for you to analyze information that you have gathered from a SWOT Analysis and make recommendations on how this information could be used. You can use the SWOT Analysis that you completed for this week’s Discussion forum, choose a different case study, or use a current situation of your own.
Create a presentation of your recommendations from a SWOT Analysis. You have a number of options that you can use. Choose one of these:
- Create a PowerPoint presentation. This presentation would be 6-10 slides including a title slide and reference slide.
- Create a video or multi-media presentation (e.g. Youtube, Kaltura, or Adobe Connect). A media presentation would be 3-4 minutes in length.
- Create the script of a presentation. A script of a presentation would be 1-2 pages in length.
- Write a business letter to an organization. A business letter with recommendations from the SWOT Analysis would be 1-2 pages in length.
Rubric
HC402 Unit 2 Assignment – SWOT Analysis
HC402 Unit 2 Assignment – SWOT Analysis
Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
|
35.0 pts
Level 5
Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors.
|
31.5 pts
Level 4
Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed.
|
28.0 pts
Level 3
Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial.
|
24.5 pts
Level 2
Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors.
|
21.0 pts
Level 1
Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual factors but does not provide a defined statement.
|
0.0 pts
Level 0
There is no evidence of a defined statement.
|
|
35.0 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysisPRICE-P
|
45.0 pts
Level 5
Organizes and compares evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.
|
40.5 pts
Level 4
Organizes and interprets evidence to reveal patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.
|
36.0 pts
Level 3
Organizes and describes evidence according to patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.
|
31.5 pts
Level 2
Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing patterns, differences, or similarities.
|
27.0 pts
Level 1
Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.
|
0.0 pts
Level 0
Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.
|
|
45.0 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting
|
10.0 pts
Level 5
The paper exhibits an excellent command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.
|
9.0 pts
Level 4
The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.
|
8.0 pts
Level 3
The paper exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.
|
7.0 pts
Level 2
The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.
|
6.0 pts
Level 1
The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.
|
0.0 pts
Level 0
The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty in discerning the meaning.
|
|
10.0 pts
|
Total Points: 90.0
|
<a href="https://herzing.instructure.com/courses/7156/modules/items/413295" role="button" class="Button module-sequence-footer-button–previous" data-tooltip="right" data-html-tooltip-title=" Unit 2 Discussion – SWOT Analysis” aria-describedby=”msf0-previous-desc”>